The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fused Filament Fabrication of PEEK: A Review of Process-Structure-Property Relationships
Open accessAbstract
Poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK) is a high-performance engineering thermoplastic polymer with potential for use in a variety of metal replacement applications due to its high strength to weight ratio. This combination of properties makes it an ideal material for use in the production of bespoke replacement parts for out-of-earth manufacturing purposes, in particular on the International Space Station (ISS). Additive manufacturing (AM) may be employed for the production of these parts, as it has enabled new fabrication pathways for articles with complex design considerations. However, AM of PEEK via fused filament fabrication (FFF) encounters significant challenges, mostly stemming from the semi crystalline nature of PEEK and its associated high melting temperature. This makes PEEK highly susceptible to changes in processing conditions which leads to a large reported variation in the literature on the final performance of PEEK. This has limited the adaption of FFF printing of PEEK in space applications where quality assurance and reproducibility are paramount. In recent years, several research studies have examined the effect of printing parameters on the performance of the 3D-printed PEEK parts. The aim of the current review is to provide comprehensive information in relation to the process-structure-property relationships in FFF 3D-printing of PEEK to provide a clear baseline to the research community and assesses its potential for space applications, including out-of-earth manufacturing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“PEEK is particularly well-suited for use in extraterrestrial environments, especially Lunar conditions, due to its 3D printability, high glass transition temperature Tg (143 ◦ C), and operating temperature (250 ◦ C).”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [194]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It also offers high tensile strength (around 100 MPa) and low density ( 1320 kg/m 3 )”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [194]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“meets NASA and ESA's outgassing requirements, high radiation and chemical resistance, and a semi-crystalline structure.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [194]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, printing PEEK can be challenging due to its semicrystalline nature, high melting point, and high melt viscosity.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [194]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These characteristics make it a potential alternative to metals in some applications and a suitable choice for structural and mechanical applications [194-196].”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [194]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering
Melchels, F. P. W., Feijén, J., & Grijpma, D. W. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 · Cited by 2,473
PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants
Kurtz, S. M., & Devine, J. N. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 · Cited by 2,391
Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs
Guo, N., & Leu, M. C. (2013) · Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 · Cited by 2,188
3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities
Stansbury, J. W., & Idacavage, M. J. (2015) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018 · Cited by 1,758
Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials
Chia, H. N., & Wu, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 · Cited by 1,734
Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics
Najeeb, S., Zafar, M. S., Khurshid, Z., & Siddiqui, F. (2015) · Journal of Prosthodontic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 · Cited by 920
Wu, W., Geng, P., Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H., & Zhao, J. X. (2015) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma8095271 · Cited by 882
Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering
Kruth, J., Wang, X., Laoui, T., & Froyen, L. (2003) · Assembly Automation · doi:10.1108/01445150310698652 · Cited by 833
Turner, B. N., & Gold, S. A. (2015) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-02-2013-0017 · Cited by 771
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 123 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Shahmirzadi, S.R., Yousefi, A.A., and Naderpour, N. (2016, January 2–5). Morphology and rheological properties of copper–polypropylene composite as a candidate for fusion deposition modeling (FDM) filament. Proceedings of the 12th International Seminar on Polymer Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
- Rechtenwald, T., Eßer, G., Schmidt, M., and Pohle, D. (2005). Comparison between Laser Sintering of PEEK and PA using design of experiment methods. Virtual Modelling and Rapid Manufacturing: Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Leiria, Portugal, 28 September–1 Octorber 2005, CRC Press.
- Daurskikh, A., Sgambati, A., Graça, D., Berg, M., Baptista, A., Angelo, M., and Lafont, U. (2018, January 1–5). Influence of spatial orientation on properties of 3D printed PEEK parts and their design adaptation. Proceedings of the 69th International Astronautical Congress, Bremen, Germany.
- Lafont, U., Siarov, S., Egmond, D.A., and van Semprimoschnig, C. (2017, January 17–22). 3D printed PEEK processed by fused filament fabrication: Properties and process relation. Proceedings of the EUROMAT, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183101 · Cited by 587
Fused deposition modelling: Current status, methodology, applications and future prospects
Cano-Vicent, A., Tambuwala, M. M., Hassan, S. S., Barh, D., Aljabali, A. A. A., Birkett, M., Arjunan, A., & Serrano‐Aroca, Á. (2021) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102378 · Cited by 512
Fico, D., Rizzo, D., Casciaro, R., & Corcione, C. E. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14030465 · Cited by 272
Ceretti, D. V. A., Edeleva, M., Cardon, L., & D’hooge, D. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28052344 · Cited by 169
Rinaldi, M., Cecchini, F., Pigliaru, L., Ghidini, T., Lumaca, F., & Nanni, F. M. C. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13010011 · Cited by 155
Goh, G. D., Wong, K. K., Tan, N., Seet, H. L., & Nai, M. L. S. (2024) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2024.2336160 · Cited by 143
Zhang, H., Huang, T., Jiang, Q., He, L., Bismarck, A., & Hu, Q. (2021) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-021-06111-w · Cited by 111
Sola, A. (2022) · Macromolecular Materials and Engineering · doi:10.1002/mame.202200197 · Cited by 93
Elhattab, K., Bhaduri, S. B., & Sikder, P. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14061222 · Cited by 95
Kouka, M. A., Abbassi, F., Habibi, M., Chabert, F., Zghal, A., & Garnier, C. (2022) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.202200650 · Cited by 93
Rodzeń, K., Sharma, P. K., McIlhagger, A., Mokhtari, M., Dave, F., Tormey, D., Sherlock, R. J., Meenan, B. J., & Boyd, A. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13040545 · Cited by 82
Tran, T. Q., Ng, F. L., Kai, J. T. Y., Feih, S., & Nai, M. L. S. (2022) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102724 · Cited by 80
Additive manufacturing of high‐performance engineering polymers: present and future
Weyhrich, C. W., & Long, T. E. (2021) · Polymer International · doi:10.1002/pi.6343 · Cited by 78
Alkabbanie, R., Aktaş, B., Demircan, G., & Yalçın, Ş. P. (2024) · Iranian Polymer Journal · doi:10.1007/s13726-024-01315-8 · Cited by 75
Zhen, H., Zhao, B., Quan, L., & Fu, J. (2023) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym15092209 · Cited by 68
Simunec, D. P., Jacob, J., Kandjani, A. E., Trinchi, A., & Sola, A. (2023) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112553 · Cited by 70
Tribological performance of 3D printed neat and carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites
Dhakal, N., Espejo, C., Morina, A., & Emami, N. (2024) · Tribology International · doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2024.109356 · Cited by 71
Kearns, E. R., Gillespie, R., & D’Alessandro, D. M. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d1ta08777k · Cited by 70
Effect of temperature history during additive manufacturing on crystalline morphology of PEEK
Lee, A., Wynn, M., Quigley, L., Salviato, M., & Zobeiry, N. (2022) · Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.aime.2022.100085 · Cited by 70
Yavaş, D. (2023) · Composites Part B Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110987 · Cited by 62
Dallal, S., Eslami, B., & Tiari, S. (2025) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym17141968 · Cited by 63
A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction
Azami, M., Kazemi, Z., Moazen, S., Dubé, M., Potvin, M.-J., & Skonieczny, K. (2024) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101045 · Cited by 57
3D printing of dental restorations: Mechanical properties of thermoplastic polymer materials
Schönhoff, L. M., Mayinger, F., Eichberger, M., Reznikova, E., & Stawarczyk, B. (2021) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104544 · Cited by 57
Analysis, classification and remediation of defects in material extrusion 3D printing
Erokhin, K. S., Naumov, S., & Ananikov, V. P. (2023) · Russian Chemical Reviews · doi:10.59761/rcr5103 · Cited by 56
Guo, C., Liu, X., & Liu, G. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13132175 · Cited by 54
Fused Filament Fabrication for Metallic Materials: A Brief Review
Costa, J. M., Sequeiros, E. W., & Vieira, M. F. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16247505 · Cited by 50
Rinaldi, M., Ferrara, M., Pigliaru, L., Allegranza, C., & Nanni, F. M. C. (2021) · CEAS Space Journal · doi:10.1007/s12567-021-00401-4 · Cited by 49
Sun, C., Kang, J., Yang, C., Zheng, J., Su, Y., Dong, E., Liu, Y., Yao, S., Shi, C., Pang, H., et al. (2022) · PubMed Central · doi:10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.02.001 · Cited by 45
Challa, B. T., Gummadi, S. K., Elhattab, K., Ahlstrom, J., & Sikder, P. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-09360-4 · Cited by 48
Research on the Fused Deposition Modeling of Polyether Ether Ketone
Gao, R., Xie, J., Yang, J., Zhuo, C., Fu, J., & Zhao, P. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13142344 · Cited by 44
Silva, R. G., Torres, M. J., Viñuela, J. Z., & González-Zamora, A. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13040635 · Cited by 42
Moby, V., Dupagne, L., Fouquet, V., Attal, J., François, P., & Dursun, E. (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15196801 · Cited by 39
Liu, T., Zhang, M., Kang, Y., Tian, X., Ding, J., & Li, D. (2023) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2023.103390 · Cited by 41
Wang, L., Yang, C., Sun, C., Yan, X., He, J., Shi, C., Liu, C., Li, D., Jiang, T., & Huang, L. (2022) · International Journal of Bioprinting · doi:10.18063/ijb.v8i4.615 · Cited by 42
Rashed, K., Kafi, A., Simons, R., & Bateman, S. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-10134-1 · Cited by 39
Essential work of fracture studies of 3D Printed PEEK (Poly-ether-ether-ketone) polymer
Sharma, G., Vuppuluri, A., & Suresh, K. (2022) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108656 · Cited by 38
Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: A Review on Filament-Based Process
Spina, R., & Morfini, L. (2024) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma17112779 · Cited by 37
Vidakis, N., Petousis, M., Spyridaki, M., Mountakis, N., Dimitriou, E., & Michailidis, N. (2025) · Materials Science and Engineering R Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2025.101086 · Cited by 39
Study Of the compression behaviours of 3D-printed PEEK/CFR-PEEK sandwich composite structures
Jiang, H., Aihemaiti, P., Aiyiti, W., & Kasimu, A. (2021) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2021.2014636 · Cited by 37
de Seijas, M. O. V., Piskacev, M., Celotti, L., Nadalini, R., Daurskikh, A., Baptista, A., Berg, M., Caltavituro, F., Major, I., Devine, D. M., et al. (2024) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.03.015 · Cited by 33
Self-citation4D Printing of Magnetically Responsive Materials and Their Applications
Bai, Y., Zhu, S., Liang, J., Xing, R., & Kong, J. (2025) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0847 · Cited by 36
Sommacal, S., Matschinski, A., Holmes, J. W., Drechsler, K., & Compston, P. (2022) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116635 · Cited by 35
Lannunziata, E., Colucci, G., Minetola, P., & Giubilini, A. (2024) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-024-13347-8 · Cited by 33
Rodzeń, K., McIvor, M. J., Sharma, P. K., Acheson, J. G., McIlhagger, A., Mokhtari, M., McFerran, A., Ward, J., Meenan, B. J., & Boyd, A. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183117 · Cited by 33
Improvement in Mechanical Properties of 3D‐Printed PEEK Structure by Nonsolvent Vapor Annealing
Chen, W., Zhang, X., Tan, D., Xu, P., Yang, B., Shi, K., Zhu, B., Liu, Q., Lei, Y., Liu, S., et al. (2022) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.202100874 · Cited by 32
Temperature Influence on Additive Manufactured Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites
Muna, I. I., & Mieloszyk, M. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14216413 · Cited by 29
Petersmann, S., Smith, J. A. M., Schäfer, U., & Arbeiter, F. J. (2022) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.143 · Cited by 28
Polyaryletherketones: Properties and applications in modern medicine
Sacks, G. I., Shah, V., Yao, L. E., Yan, C., Shah, D., Limeta, L., & DeStefano, V. (2024) · Biomedical Technology · doi:10.1016/j.bmt.2023.11.002 · Cited by 29
PEEK-based 3D printing: a paradigm shift in implant revolution for healthcare
Kennedy, S. M., Raghav, G. R., Robert, R., Manikandaraja, G., & Selvakumar, M. (2024) · Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials · doi:10.1080/25740881.2024.2302537 · Cited by 29
Effect of geometry on the mechanical response of additively manufactured polymer
Zhang, Y. J., Choi, J. P., & Moon, S. K. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107245 · Cited by 28
Alo, O. A., Mauchline, D., & Otunniyi, I. O. (2021) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.202101219 · Cited by 28
High-strength light-weight aramid fibre/polyamide 12 composites printed by Multi Jet Fusion
Chen, J., Tan, P., Liu, X., Tey, W. S., Ong, A. C. Y., Zhao, L., & Zhou, K. (2022) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2022.2036931 · Cited by 28
Li, T., Song, Z., Yang, X., & Du, J. (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16010036 · Cited by 28
Zarean, P., Malgaroli, P., Zarean, P., Seiler, D., de Wild, M., Thieringer, F. M., & Sharma, N. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13031230 · Cited by 28
Bazan, A., Turek, P., & Zakręcki, A. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16062405 · Cited by 27
Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Its 3D-Printed Quantitate Assessment in Cranial Reconstruction
Moiduddin, K., Mian, S. H., Elseufy, S. M., Alkhalefah, H., Ramalingam, S., & Sayeed, A. (2023) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb14080429 · Cited by 27
Lv, X., Yang, S., Pei, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., & Wang, T. (2024) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.28380 · Cited by 27
Raza, W., Mehmood, A., Hussain, A., Ahmad, M., Mushtaq, M. A., Hussain, S. N., Raza, N., Cai, X., & Liu, D. (2024) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.111717 · Cited by 27
Evaluating poly(ether ether ketone) powder recyclability for selective laser sintering applications
Patel, A., Venoor, V., Yang, F., Chen, X., & Sobkowicz, M. J. (2021) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109502 · Cited by 27
Impact of surface roughness and bulk porosity on spinal interbody implants
Levy, H. A., Karamian, B. A., Yalla, G. R., Canseco, J. A., Vaccaro, A. R., & Kepler, C. K. (2022) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.35161 · Cited by 27
Vindokurov, I., Pirogova, Y., Анатольевич, Т. М., & Silberschmidt, V. V. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14245521 · Cited by 30
Lv, X., Yang, S., Pei, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., & Wang, T. (2023) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.27946 · Cited by 27
Sadeghzade, M., Dadashi, A., & Gharehbaghi, H. (2025) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114970 · Cited by 29
Estimating the Accuracy of Mandible Anatomical Models Manufactured Using Material Extrusion Methods
Turek, P., & Budzik, G. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13142271 · Cited by 25
Curmi, A., Rochman, A., & Buhagiar, J. (2024) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2024.104086 · Cited by 25
Gao, J., Li, W., Wang, J., Wang, X., Sha, C., & Zhao, K. (2024) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108432 · Cited by 23
Tsai, H.-H., Wu, S., Wu, Y.-D., & Hong, W.-Z. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14112276 · Cited by 23
Khan, W. A., Hassan, M., Ahmed, I., Xiao, M., Faraz, M. I., Li, K., Khan, I., Muhammad, R., Wu, H., & Hussain, G. (2024) · International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.05.011 · Cited by 23
Gobena, S. T., & Woldeyohannes, A. D. (2024) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103317 · Cited by 23
A review of electrically conductive poly(ether ether ketone) materials
Mokhtari, M., Archer, E., Bloomfield, N., Harkin‐Jones, E., & McIlhagger, A. (2021) · Polymer International · doi:10.1002/pi.6176 · Cited by 21
Multifunctional thermal rotating cloak with nonconformal geometry
Xing, X., Wu, L., Dai, X., Tian, X., & Li, D. (2023) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124437 · Cited by 21
Naghavi, S. A., Sun, C., Hejazi, M., Tamaddon, M., Zheng, J., Wang, L., Zhang, C., Varma, S. N., Li, D., Moazen, M., et al. (2022) · PubMed Central · doi:10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.02.006 · Cited by 20
de Seijas, M. O. V., Bardenhagen, A., Rohr, T., & Stoll, E. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16020885 · Cited by 20
Chen, Y., Mao, J., Qian, B., & Zhao, M. (2023) · Composite Interfaces · doi:10.1080/09276440.2023.2279398 · Cited by 20
Polyether Ketone Ketone (PEKK) matrix composites for material extrusion additive manufacturing
Rashed, K., Kafi, A. A., Simons, R., Dell’Olio, M., & Bateman, S. A. (2024) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-024-13026-8 · Cited by 20
Tian, J., Zhang, R., Yang, J., Chou, W., Xue, P., & Ding, Y. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13071107 · Cited by 19
Khatri, B., Roth, M. F., & Balle, F. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · doi:10.3390/jmmp7010002 · Cited by 19
Sharma, N., Oteiza, J. Z., Tourbier, C., & Thieringer, F. M. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12072495 · Cited by 19
Vatandaş, B. B., & Gümrük, R. (2024) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-024-14209-z · Cited by 19
Zhao, Y., An, Y., Wu, F. Y., Liu, L., Tay, F. R., Jiao, Y., & Wang, J. (2025) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03272-7 · Cited by 18
Review on Recycled Materials for Additive Manufacturing
Dong, Y., Li, H., Wang, L., Chen, J. X., Sucală, V. I., & Jiang, J. (2025) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology · doi:10.1007/s40684-025-00788-z · Cited by 18
Golbang, A., Mokhtari, M., Harkin‐Jones, E., Archer, E., & McIlhagger, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Materials · doi:10.3389/fmats.2021.745088 · Cited by 17
Kumar, N., Ukey, P. D., Francis, V., Singh, R. P., & Sahu, S. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818311-3.00019-7 · Cited by 18
Ali, M. A., Fidan, I., & Tantawi, K. H. (2023) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-023-11279-3 · Cited by 18
Duan, Y., Liang, Q., Yang, Z. C., Wang, X., Liu, P., & Li, D. (2023) · Science China Technological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11431-023-2438-1 · Cited by 18
Turek, P., Budzik, G., & Przeszłowski, Ł. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12112444 · Cited by 18
Tóth, C., Molnár, K., & Virág, Á. D. (2025) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.29850 · Cited by 17
Wang, P., Zhang, H., Cao, Y., Pan, A., & Wu, W. (2022) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.52438 · Cited by 17
Lingua, A., Sosa-Rey, F., Pautard, S., Therriault, D., & Lévesque, M. (2023) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109343 · Cited by 17
Rinaldi, M., Bragaglia, M., & Nanni, F. M. C. (2022) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116459 · Cited by 17
Microstructure and thermal properties of nano-SiO2 reinforced 3D printed multiscale PEEK composites
Dhakal, N., Espejo, C., Morina, A., & Emami, N. (2025) · Composites Part B Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112599 · Cited by 16
Warpage in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Amorphous and Semicrystalline Polymers
Zerriouh, A., Deghiche, A., Benayache, W., Hashemi, T., Bernardi, A., Liparoti, S., Lorenzo, M. D. D., & Cavallo, D. (2025) · Macromolecular materials and engineering (Print) · doi:10.1002/mame.202500172 · Cited by 22
Wu, W., Xin, J., Hu, B., Chen, R., Huang, D., Huang, Z., Feng, J., Du, C., & Shan, B. (2023) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2023.103735 · Cited by 16
Davies, R., Yi, N., McCutchion, P., & Ghita, O. R. (2021) · Polymer International · doi:10.1002/pi.6172 · Cited by 16
Zheng, J., Dong, E., Kang, J., Sun, C., Liu, C., Wang, L., & Li, D. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13152547 · Cited by 16
Extrusion and thermal control design of an on-orbit 3D printing platform
Tang, J., Kwan, T. H., & Wu, X. (2021) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2021.11.029 · Cited by 16
de Carvalho, W. S., Marzemin, F., Belei, C. A. F., Petersmann, S., Arbeiter, F. J., & Amancio‐Filho, S. T. (2023) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108207 · Cited by 15
Effects of 3D printing parameters on the flexural properties of semi-crystalline PEKK
Maloney, A., Major, I., Gately, N., & Devine, D. M. (2024) · Materials Today Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.111152 · Cited by 16
Self-citationLiu, T., Yang, T., Zhang, M., Kang, Y., Wang, X., Li, H., Tian, X., Ding, J., & Li, D. (2024) · Composites Part B Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.112083 · Cited by 15
Mechanical and wear behaviour of PEEK, PTFE and PU: review and experimental study
Natarajan, E., Sekar, S. M., Markandan, K., Sasikumar, R., Saravanakumar, N., & Dilip, A. A. (2022) · Journal of Polymer Engineering · doi:10.1515/polyeng-2021-0325 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanjanijam, A. R., Major, I., Lyons, J. G., Lafont, U., & Devine, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Athlone Institute of Technology (IE)
- European Space Agency (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Devine, Declan M.
- Venue
- Polymers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-07-27
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1665
- ISSN
- 2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7465918
- OpenAlex
- W3044352071
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Polymers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Research@THEA (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Space Agency (4000126158/18/NL/FE)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
- Keywords
- PEEK, fused deposition modeling, process-structure-property relationships, semicrystalline polymers, printing parameters, polymer 3D printing, space applications, International Space Station, metal substitution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
