The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrospraying, a Reproducible Method for Production of Polymeric Microspheres for Biomedical Applications
Open accessAbstract
The ability to reproducibly load bioactive molecules into polymeric microspheres is a challenge. Traditional microsphere fabrication methods typically provide inhomogeneous release profiles and suffer from lack of batch to batch reproducibility, hindering their potential to up-scale and their translation to the clinic. This deficit in homogeneity is in part attributed to broad size distributions and variability in the morphology of particles. It is thus desirable to control morphology and size of non-loaded particles in the first instance, in preparation for obtaining desired release profiles of loaded particles in the later stage. This is achieved by identifying the key parameters involved in particle production and understanding how adapting these parameters affects the final characteristics of particles. In this study, electrospraying was presented as a promising technique for generating reproducible particles made of polycaprolactone, a biodegradable, FDA-approved polymer. Narrow size distributions were obtained by the control of electrospraying flow rate and polymer concentration, with average particle sizes ranging from 10 to 20 µm. Particles were shown to be spherical with a homogeneous embossed texture, determined by the polymer entanglement regime taking place during electrospraying. No toxic residue was detected by this process based on preliminary cell work using DNA quantification assays, validating this method as suitable for further loading of bioactive components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century
Woodruff, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2010) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 · Cited by 4,033
Self-citationFreitas, S., Merkle, H. P., & Gander, B. (2005) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.10.015 · Cited by 923
Cited by
Electrospraying of polymers with therapeutic molecules: State of the art
Bock, N., Dargaville, T. R., & Woodruff, M. A. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.03.002 · Cited by 440
Self-citationXie, J., Jiang, J., Davoodi, P., Srinivasan, M. P., & Wang, C.-H. (2015) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2014.08.061 · Cited by 317
Abiotic synthesis of purine and pyrimidine ribonucleosides in aqueous microdroplets
Nam, I., Nam, H. G., & Zare, R. N. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1718559115 · Cited by 157
Drug release from core-shell PVA/silk fibroin nanoparticles fabricated by one-step electrospraying
Cao, Y., Liu, F., Chen, Y., Yu, T., Lou, D., Guo, Y., Li, P., Wang, Z., & Ran, H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12351-1 · Cited by 104
Qayyum, A. S., Jain, E., Kolar, G., Kim, Y., Sell, S. A., & Zustiak, S. P. (2017) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aa703c · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Bock, N., Woodruff, M. A., Hutmacher, D. W., & Dargaville, T. R.
- Venue
- Polymers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2011-01-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-149
- ISSN
- 2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977464265
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrospraying, a Reproducible Method for Production of Polymeric Microspheres for Biomedical Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/polym3010131
- The paper
- Bock, N., Woodruff, M. A., Hutmacher, D. W., & Dargaville, T. R. (2011). Electrospraying, a Reproducible Method for Production of Polymeric Microspheres for Biomedical Applications. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym3010131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.