Cited by 21Face recognition and analysisSocial Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and Audio Processing

Multimodal Age and Gender Estimation for Adaptive Human-Robot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review

Open access
Younis, Hussain A., Ruhaiyem, Nur Intan Raihana, Badr, Ameer A., Abdul-Hassan, Alia K., Alfadli, Ibrahim M., Binjumah, Weam M., Altuwaijri, Eman A., Nasser, Maged·2023·Processes

Abstract

Identifying the gender of a person and his age by way of speaking is considered a crucial task in computer vision. It is a very important and active research topic with many areas of application, such as identifying a person, trustworthiness, demographic analysis, safety and health knowledge, visual monitoring, and aging progress. Data matching is to identify the gender of the person and his age. Thus, the study touches on a review of many research papers from 2016 to 2022. At the heart of the topic, many systematic reviews of multimodal pedagogies in Age and Gender Estimation for Adaptive were undertaken. However, no current study of the theme concerns connected to multimodal pedagogies in Age and Gender Estimation for Adaptive Learning has been published. The multimodal pedagogies in four different databases within the keywords indicate the heart of the topic. A qualitative thematic analysis based on 48 articles found during the search revealed four common themes, such as multimodal engagement and speech with the Human-Robot Interaction life world. The study touches on the presentation of many major concepts, namely Age Estimation, Gender Estimation, Speaker Recognition, Speech recognition, Speaker Localization, and Speaker Gender Identification. According to specific criteria, they were presented to all studies. The essay compares these themes to the thematic findings of other review studies on the same topic such as multimodal age, gender estimation, and dataset used. The main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis based on the surveyed region. The study provides a platform for professors, researchers, and students alike, and proposes directions for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/pr11051488

Cites

125 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Badr, 2022, Speaker gender identification in matched and mismatched conditions based on stacking ensemble method, J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 17, 1119
  2. 2014, How to do a structured literature review in computer science, Researchgate, 1, 1
  3. Keele, S. (2023, February 12). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Tech. Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Tech. Report. EBSE. Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf.
  4. Mcmahan, H.B., Ramage, D., and Com, B.G. (2012). Federated Learning of Deep Networks using Model Averaging. arXiv.
  5. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
  6. Liu, Y., Fung, P., Yang, Y., Cieri, C., Huang, S., and Graff, D. (2006). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.
  7. Zhao, M., Ma, Y., Liu, M., and Xu, M. (2021). The speakin system for voxceleb speaker recognition challange 2021. arXiv.
  8. Sadjadi, S.O. (2021). NIST SRE CTS Superset: A large-scale dataset for telephony speaker recognition. arXiv.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Younis, H. A., Ruhaiyem, N. I. R., Badr, A. A., Abdul-Hassan, A. K., Alfadli, I. M., Binjumah, W. M., Altuwaijri, E. A., & Nasser, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Basrah (IQ)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • Middle Technical University (IQ)
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Technology, Baghdad 10011, Iraq
  • Taibah University (SA)
  • King Saud University (SA)
Corresponding author
Ruhaiyem, Nur Intan Raihana
Venue
Processes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-05-15
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
1488
ISSN
2227-9717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381792814
Cited by
21
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundamental Research (FRGS/1/2021/ICT04/USM/02/1/)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
age estimation, gender prediction, human-robot interaction, adaptive learning, speaker recognition, speech recognition, speaker localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review