The Use of the Autotrophic Culture of Arthrospira platensis for CO2 Fixation from Biogas Combustion
Open accessAbstract
The increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has a strong impact on global warming. Therefore, efficient technologies must be used to reduce CO2 emissions. One of the methods is the biofixation of CO2 by microalgae and cyanobacteria. This is now a widely described technology that can improve the economics of biomass production and reduce CO2 emissions. There are no reports on the possibility of using it to clean exhaust gases from biogas combustion. The aim of the research was to determine the possibility of using Arthrospira platensis cultures to remove CO2 from biogas combustion. The efficiency of biomass production and the effectiveness of biological CO2 fixation were evaluated. The use of exhaust gases led to a more efficient increase in cyanobacterial biomass. The growth rate in the exponential phase was 209 ± 17 mgVS/L·day, allowing a biomass concentration of 2040 ± 49 mgVS/L. However, the use of exhaust gases led to a decrease in the pH of the culture medium and a rapid decline in the Arthrospira platensis population. The cyanobacteria effectively fixed CO2, and its concentration was limited from 13 ± 1% to 1.3 ± 0.7%. There was no influence of the exhaust gases on changes in the qualitative composition of the cyanobacterial biomass. In the culture fed with exhaust gas, the A. platensis population quickly entered the death phase, which requires close monitoring. This is an important indication for potential operators of large-scale photobioreactors.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The study tested *Arthrospira platensis* in vertical photobioreactors to fix CO₂ from biogas combustion exhaust gases versus atmospheric air. Exhaust gas increased exponential-phase growth and CO₂ removal but caused a rapid pH decline and early death phase, without changing the main biomass composition.
Key findings
- CO₂ in biogas combustion exhaust was reduced from 15.7 ± 1.9% at inflow to 1.3 ± 0.7% at outflow; biosequestration efficiency ranged from 87.3 ± 1.1% to 96.2 ± 0.6% depending on growth phase.
- In the exhaust-gas variant, exponential-phase growth rate was 209 ± 17 mgVS/L·day versus 148 ± 12 mgVS/L·day with air, allowing biomass concentrations of 2040 ± 49 mgVS/L versus a control maximum of 1800 mgVS/L.
- The exhaust-gas culture had a shorter stationary phase (3 days) than the air control (7 days) and then entered death phase; pH rose to 9.33 ± 0.09 after 12 days and later fell to 8.70 ± 0.12.
- Biomass composition was similar between variants: volatile solids about 93%, proteins close to 37%, lipids 11%, and carbohydrates around 26%, with no significant effect of CO₂ source.
Methods
- Two variants were run in vertical column photobioreactors with 10.0 L culture medium: V1 used atmospheric air, and V2 used cooled exhaust gases from biogas combustion; *A. platensis* UTEX 3086 was inoculated to about 250 mg VS/L, and CO₂ mass flow was set to 8.0 mgCO₂/min.
- Exhaust gas averaged 15.7 ± 1.9% CO₂; the first two culture cycles were excluded from data analysis to limit effects of CO₂ absorption in the medium.
- Samples were taken daily in five repetitions; analysis used one-way ANOVA at p < 0.05 with Tukey HSD, and measured VS, chlorophyll a, gas composition, pH, TC, TOC, TN, Ptot, proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids.
Limitations
- Stated: further research should determine the maximum exhaust gas amount that can be introduced without limiting CO₂ fixation or inhibiting biomass production, automate the process and possibly link exhaust gas addition to pH changes, and increase technical readiness level and scale for mass, energy, economic balance, and life cycle assessment.
- Stated: a complete and reliable assessment of CO₂ fixation efficiency requires accounting for energy consumption during cultivation, which is only possible with pilot- or technical-scale data.
- Evident: the experiment was on a fractional technical scale with 10 L photobioreactors and ended when the population reached death/lysis; no energy balance or life cycle assessment is reported, and the exhaust-gas culture required close monitoring because it entered death phase after only three days of stable growth.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 13 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In V2, the biosequestration efficiency of CO2 from exhaust gases ranged from 87.3 ± 1.1% to 96.2 ± 0.6% depending on growth phase and culture progress.
“It was found that the efficiency of biosequestration of CO2 from exhaust gases (V2) was very high, ranging from 87.3 ± 1.1% to 96.2 ± 0.6% depending on the growth phase and progress of the A. platensis culture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In V2, after the death phase was observed, pH decreased to 8.70 ± 0.12.
“In the following days, the death phase of the culture was observed in V2, leading to a decrease in the production of exometabolites by the cyanobacteria and a decrease in pH to 8.70 ± 0.12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In V2, the CO2 concentration in the gas flowing out of the V-PBR ranged from 0.5 ± 0.2% to 2.0 ± 0.1%.
“The CO2 concentration in the gas flowing out of the V-PBR ranged from 0.5 ± 0.2% to 2.0 ± 0.1% (Figure 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The culture medium had a hardness of 474 ± 14 mg CaCO3/L.
“Considering that the culture medium had a hardness of 474 ± 14 mg CaCO3/L, the chemical absorption of CO2 by calcium or magnesium ions could have a significant influence on the observed binding effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Feeding the V-PBR with exhaust gases in V2 enabled complete removal of CO, NOx and SOx.
“Feeding the V-PBR with exhaust gases in V2 also enabled the complete removal of CO, NOx and SOx.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
In V2, the cyanobacteria effectively fixed CO2, limiting its concentration from 13 ± 1% to 1.3 ± 0.7%.
“The cyanobacteria effectively fixed CO2, and its concentration was limited from 13 ± 1% to 1.3 ± 0.7%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In V2, pH increased from 7.17 ± 0.04 at the beginning of the experiment to 9.33 ± 0.09 after 12 days of culture.
“The pH increased from 7.17 ± 0.04 at the beginning of the experiment to 9.33 ± 0.09 after 12 days of culture (Figure 3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The duration of the lag phase and exponential growth phase was the same for both variants, averaging 5 and 8 days, respectively.
“Experience has shown that the duration of the lag phase and the exponential growth phase was the same for both variants, averaging 5 and 8 days, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A. platensis biomass effectively fixed CO2 from biogas combustion.
“It was shown that the biomass of A. platensis effectively fixed CO2 from the combustion of biogas.”
- Also stated in: § 4. Conclusions · plain
“The cyanobacteria effectively captured the CO2 from the biogas combustion, and its concentration was reduced from 13 ± 1% to 1.3 ± 0.7%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4. Conclusions · plain
- Findingown data
The average CO2 content in the exhaust gases was 15.7% ± 1.9%.
“The average CO2 content in the exhaust gases was 15.7% ± 1.9%.”
- Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
“In V2, the CO2 concentration in the exhaust gases from the biogas combustion was significantly higher and averaged 15.7 ± 1.9%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
- Findingnone given
Feeding the V-PBR with exhaust gases had no significant effect on the biomass properties in terms of organic matter content, including lipids, proteins and carbohydrates.
“Feeding the V-PBR with exhaust gases had no significant effect on the biomass properties in terms of organic matter content, including lipids, proteins and carbohydrates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The growth rate in the exponential growth phase was 209 ± 17 mgVS/L•day.
“The growth rate in the exponential growth phase was 209 ± 17 mgVS/L•day, which allowed a biomass concentration of 2040 ± 49 mgVS/L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using CO2 from biogas combustion, higher concentrations of cyanobacteria in the photobioreactors were observed.
“Using this CO2 source, a higher growth rate of the biomass in the logarithmic growth phase and higher concentrations of cyanobacteria in the photobioreactors were also observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The purified biogas fed to the CHP contained 64.3 ± 1.6% CH4, 31.7 ± 1.1% CO2, 80 ± 10 ppm H2S, 1.0 ± 0.2% O2 and 3.1 ± 0.7% N2.
“The composition of the purified biogas fed into the CHP module (No.TCG3016V12C, CES Ltd., Sugar Land, TX, USA, 600 kWe) contained 64.3 ± 1.6% CH4; 31.7 ± 1.1% CO2; 80 ± 10ppm H2S; 1.0 ± 0.2% O2 and 3.1 ± 0.7% N2.”
- Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
“The raw biogas produced in the fermentation reactor and fed to combustion was characterised by the following average qualitative composition: 64.3 ± 1.6% CH4; 31.7 ± 1.1% CO2; 80 ± 10 ppm H2S; 1.0 ± 0.2% O2; 3.1 ± 0.7% N2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
- Findingown data
In the control V-PBR, the maximum biomass concentration was 1800 mgVS/L.
“In the control V-PBR, it was a maximum of 1800 mgVS/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Cultivation with air had a long phase of stationary growth.
“Cultivation with air was characterised by much greater stability and a long phase of stationary growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CO2 concentration in the gases was reduced from 13 ± 1% to 1.3 ± 0.7%.
“The cyanobacteria effectively captured the CO2 from the biogas combustion, and its concentration was reduced from 13 ± 1% to 1.3 ± 0.7%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The exhaust gas-fed culture transitioned to the A. platensis population die-off phase after only three days of stable growth.
“The exhaust gas-fed culture quickly transitioned to the A. platensis population die-off phase after only three days of stable growth, requiring close monitoring of cyanobacteria concentrations to enable rapid response and biomass removal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The biomass concentration reached 2040 ± 49 mgVS/L.
“The growth rate in the exponential growth phase was 209 ± 17 mgVS/L•day, which allowed a biomass concentration of 2040 ± 49 mgVS/L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cyanobacteria, including A. platensis, have very high potential for fixation of CO2 from exhaust gases due to high environmental tolerance and resistance to changing growth conditions and pollution.
“Due to their very high environmental tolerance and resistance to changing growth conditions and pollution, cyanobacteria, including A. platensis, also have a very high potential in the fixation of CO2 from exhaust gases [63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Zhu, 2020, Mutation of Arthrospira platensis by Gamma Irradiation to Promote Phenol Tolerance and CO2 Fixation for Coal-Chemical Flue Gas Reduction, J. CO2 Util. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The final technological effect of CO2 biosequestration is generally influenced by two factors: CO2 utilisation by photosynthesising biomass and CO2 dissolution and absorption in the culture medium.
“The literature shows that the final technological effect associated with CO2 biosequestration is generally influenced by two factors.During biosynthesis, CO2 is utilised by the photosynthesising biomass and by its dissolution and absorption in the culture medium [66].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Vargas, 2023, Advances in the Synthesis and Applications of Nanomaterials to Increase CO2 Biofixation in Microalgal Cultivation, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Because the culture medium had a hardness of 474 ± 14 mg CaCO3/L, chemical absorption of CO2 by calcium or magnesium ions could have significantly influenced the observed CO2 binding effects.
“Considering that the culture medium had a hardness of 474 ± 14 mg CaCO3/L, the chemical absorption of CO2 by calcium or magnesium ions could have a significant influence on the observed binding effects.This is confirmed by the studies of Liu et al. (2022), who analysed the efficiency of CO2 fixation in the autotrophic culture of Prymnesium parvum [67].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Liu et al. (2022)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [67] Liu, S.Y., Zhao, R.Z., Qiu, X.C., and Guo, Q. (2022). Optimization Analysis to Evaluate the Relationships between Different Ion Concentrations and Prymnesium parvum Growth Rate. Water, 14. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
To date, there are few experimental data analysing the possibility of using exhaust gases from biogas combustion in the production processes of microalgae and cyanobacteria.
“To date, there are few experimental data analysing the possibility of using exhaust gases from biogas combustion in the production processes of microalgae and cyanobacteria [45].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Venkiteshwaran, K., Xie, T., Seib, M., Tale, V.P., and Zitomer, D. (2022). Integrated Wastewater Management and Valorization Using Algal Cultures, Elsevier.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
In V1, the increase in pH correlated strongly with the dynamics of A. platensis population development and the increase in biomass concentration in the V-PBR.
“This correlated strongly with the dynamics of A. platensis population development and the increase in microalgae biomass concentration in V-PBR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The phenomenon of pH increase is characteristic of periodic cultures in which increasing exometabolite concentration from photosynthesis leads to an increase in environmental pH.
“This phenomenon is characteristic of periodic cultures in which the increasing concentration of exometabolites produced in the photosynthetic process leads to an increase in the pH of the environment [64].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Zieliński, M., Kazimierowicz, J., and Dębowski, M. (2023). The Possibility of Deploying CO2 from Biogas Combustion to Improve the Productivity of a Periodical Chlorella vulgaris Culture. Front. Biosci. Elit., 15. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reaching threshold concentrations and a significant increase in pH eventually inhibit the growth of the cyanobacterial population.
“Reaching threshold concentrations and a significant increase in pH limits eventually inhibit the growth of the cyanobacterial population [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Fang, 2018, Effects of Different Initial PH and Irradiance Levels on Cyanobacterial Colonies from Lake Taihu, China, J. Appl. Phycol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 16
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was no significant effect of the CO2 source on the composition and characteristics of A. platensis biomass; volatile solids were about 93%, protein close to 37%, lipids 11%, and carbohydrates around 26%.
“There was no significant effect of the CO2 source on the composition and characteristics of the biomass of A. platensis.Regardless of the experimental variant, the content of the basic parameters characterising the biomass was similar.The content of volatile solids was about 93%, the amount of protein was close to 37%, lipids 11% and carbohydrates around 26%.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“There was no influence of the exhaust gases on changes in the qualitative composition of the cyanobacterial biomass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn V2, a strong correlation (R2 = 0.9421) was found between CO2 concentration at the outflow from the V-PBR and recorded pH; no relationship (R2 = 0.2302) was found between these factors in the other variant.
“In V2, when exhaust gases were used, a strong correlation (R 2 = 0.9421) was found between the CO2 concentration at the outflow from the V-PBR and the recorded pH, while in V2, no relationship was found between these two monitored factors (R 2 = 0.2302) (Figure 4A,B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom day 6 to 10, chlorophyll a concentrations were significantly higher in V1; from day 11 to 15, no statistically significant differences were observed; on day 15, chlorophyll a was 6.47 ± 0.32 mg/L in V1 and 6.37 ± 0.18 mg/L in V2.
“From the 6th to the 10th day of culture, significantly higher chlorophyll a concentrations were observed in V1.However, no statistically significant differences were observed from the 11th to the 15th day of culture.Analogue chlorophyll a concentrations were observed in both experimental variants.On day 15, it was 6.47 ± 0.32 mg/L in V1, while it was 6.37 ± 0.18 mg/L in V2 (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe use of exhaust gases (V2) led to a more efficient increase in Arthrospira platensis biomass than air (V1), with an exponential-phase growth rate of 209 ± 17 mgVS/L/day versus 148 ± 12 mgVS/L/day, a statistically significant difference.
“The use of exhaust gases led to a more efficient increase in cyanobacterial biomass.The growth rate in the exponential phase was 209 ± 17 mgVS/L•day, allowing a biomass concentration of 2040 ± 49 mgVS/L.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2. Production and Properties of the Biomass · plain
“In the logarithmic growth phase, the biomass growth rate was 148 ± 12 mgVS/L-d in V1 and 209 ± 17 mgVS/L-d in V2.The observed differences were statistically significant (Figure 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.2. Production and Properties of the Biomass · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn V2, chlorophyll a decreased rapidly after day 15 to 4.99 ± 0.16 mg/L at the end of culture; in V1, it remained steady from 6.67 ± 0.34 mg/L on day 16 to 6.16 ± 0.33 mg/L on day 20.
“In the following days of the culture, a significant and rapid decrease in chlorophyll a concentration was observed in V2, which was 4.99 ± 0.16 mg/L at the end of the culture (Figure 6B).In V1, the concentration of chlorophyll a remained at a steady level until the end of the culture, ranging from 6.67 ± 0.34 mg/L on day 16 to 6.16 ± 0.33 mg/L on day 20 of the culture (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter 13 days, at the end of the exponential growth phase, V1 reached 1660 ± 74 mgVS/L and V2 reached 2030 ± 51 mgVS/L, with V2 significantly higher.
“After 13 days of culture, a value of 1660 ± 74 mgVS/L was reached at the end of the exponential growth phase in V1.In V2, the concentration of A. platensis was significantly higher at 2030 ± 51 mgVS/L (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn V1, pH increased significantly from the beginning to the 9th day of culture, and on day 20 it was 9.09 ± 0.1.
“The pH increased significantly from the beginning to the 9th day of culture (Figure 3B).”
- Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
“On day 20, at the end of the process, the pH in V1 was 9.09 ± 0.1 (Figure 3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter 20 days at the end of culture, biomass concentration was 1630 ± 81 mgVS/L in V1 and 1510 ± 48 mgVS/L in V2.
“After 20 days at the end of the culture, a concentration of 1630 ± 81 mgVS/L was reached in V1 compared to 1510 ± 48 mgVS/L in V2 (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn V1, CO2 concentration was reduced to an average of 310 ± 20 ppm, oxygen increased to 21.4 ± 0.2%, and NOx and SOx present in the air were removed.
“In V1, the CO2 concentration was reduced to an average level of 310 ± 20 ppm (Table 1 and Figure 3A), the amount of oxygen was increased to 21.4 ± 0.2% and the NOx and SOx present in the air were removed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn V2, the stationary phase lasted 3 days on average, after which the A. platensis culture entered the death phase.
“In V2, this phase was significantly shorter, lasting 3 days on average, and the biomass concentration was 2010 ± 56 mgVS/L.After this time, the A. platensis culture entered the death phase.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“In the culture fed with exhaust gas, the A. platensis population quickly entered the death phase, which requires close monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn V1, the stationary phase lasted 7 days on average and ended at 1760 ± 72 mgVS/L; in V2, it lasted 3 days on average and ended at 2010 ± 56 mgVS/L.
“In V1, this phase lasted an average of 7 days, and at its end, a cyanobacterial biomass concentration of 1760 ± 72 mgVS/L was observed.In V2, this phase was significantly shorter, lasting 3 days on average, and the biomass concentration was 2010 ± 56 mgVS/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataCultivation with air was characterised by much greater stability than the exhaust gas-fed culture.
“Cultivation with air was characterised by much greater stability and a long phase of stationary growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataUsing CO2 from biogas combustion, A. platensis had a higher growth rate in the logarithmic growth phase than in the control.
“Using this CO2 source, a higher growth rate of the biomass in the logarithmic growth phase and higher concentrations of cyanobacteria in the photobioreactors were also observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnly a few microalgae species tolerate high levels of SOx and NOx, so strain selection is important for the efficiency of CO2 fixation from exhaust gases.
“It has been proven that only a few microalgae species tolerate high levels of SOx and NOx.Therefore, the selection of strains is important for the efficiency of CO2 fixation from exhaust gases [61,62].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA. platensis is highly tolerant to changing environmental conditions, is relatively simple to cultivate, separate and harvest, has a fast growth rate, and is highly adaptable to difficult development conditions.
“A. platensis is a species with a high tolerance to changing environmental conditions.It is characterised by a relatively simple cultivation, separation and harvesting technique as well as a fast growth rate [48].”
- Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
“The choice of Arthrospira platensis for research was based on the fact that this species is highly adaptable to difficult development conditions [50].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [48] Plaza, 2020, Effect of the Foliar Application of Cyanobacterial Hydrolysate (Arthrospira platensis) on the Growth of Petunia x Hybrida under Salinity Conditions, J. Appl. Phycol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Markou, G., Kougia, E., Arapoglou, D., Chentir, I., Andreou, V., and Tzovenis, I. (2023). Production of Arthrospira Platensis: Effects on Growth and Biochemical Composition of Long-Term Acclimatization at Different Salinities. Bioengineering, 10. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExhaust gas from biogas combustion as a CO2 source has been considered promising, but the assumptions described were not based on research.
“So far, this source of CO2 has been considered promising, but the assumptions described were not based on research [46,47].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] Morales, 2020, Biomitigation of CO2 from Flue Gas by Scenedesmus Obtusiusculus AT-UAM Using a Hybrid Photobioreactor Coupled to a Biomass Recovery Stage by Electro-Coagulation-Flotation, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Park, S., Ahn, Y., Pandi, K., Ji, M.K., Yun, H.S., and Choi, J.Y. (2019). Microalgae Cultivation in Pilot Scale for Biomass Production Using Exhaust Gas from Thermal Power Plants. Energies, 12. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe use of exhaust gases is beneficial in the short term but in the long term leads to negative changes in the A. platensis population, mainly rapid transition to the death phase and dynamic biomass decline after 15 days of cultivation.
“Analysing the chlorophyll a content in V-PBR proved that the use of exhaust gases is beneficial in the short term.In the long term, however, it leads to negative changes in the population of A. platensis.This is mainly determined by the rapid transition to the death phase and the dynamic decline in biomass after 15 days of cultivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe tests were carried out in five repetitions for both research variants.
“The tests were carried out in five repetitions for both research variants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe volume flow of gases in both reactors was the same.
“As a result, the volume flow of the gases in both reactors was the same.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn both series, the CO2 mass flow rate fed to the V-PBR was set to 8.0 mgCO2/min.
“In both series, the CO2 mass flow rate fed to the V-PBR was set to 8.0 mgCO2/min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe results of the first two culture cycles were not included in the data analysis in order to limit the effects of water absorption of CO2 in the culture medium on the biosequestration results.
“In order to limit the effects of the process of water absorption of CO2 in the culture medium on the biosequestration results obtained, the results of the first two culture cycles were not included in the data analysis.”
- Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
“The results of the first two cultivation cycles were not considered when analysing the experimental data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.1. CO2 Biofixation and pH Changes · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataStatistical analysis used one-way analysis of variance with significance level p < 0.05 and the Tukey HSD test for differences between means.
“The statistical analysis was performed using a oneway analysis of variance with the assumed significance level (p < 0.05).The differences between the mean values of the variables were tested using the Tukey HSD test (Statistica 13.3 PL).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no reports on the possibility of using microalgae or cyanobacteria to clean exhaust gases from biogas combustion.
“There are no reports on the possibility of using it to clean exhaust gases from biogas combustion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Too low CO2 concentrations in photobioreactors are one of the main factors limiting the efficiency of biomass production of microalgae and cyanobacteria.
“It has been proven that too low CO2 concentrations in PBR are one of the main factors limiting the efficiency of biomass production of microalgae and cyanobacteria.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microalgae-based systems can be effectively used in wastewater and leachate treatment, waste and sewage sludge neutralisation, carbon dioxide biostorage, biogas upgrading, and flue gas cleaning.
“Previous studies have shown that microalgae-based systems can be effectively used in wastewater and leachate treatment, waste and sewage sludge neutralisation, carbon dioxide biostorage, biogas upgrading, and flue gas cleaning [22-27].”
From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
The Introduction (page not provided) describes microalgae and cyanobacteria capturing CO2 and using wastewater and post-digestion leachate in cultivation; the paper also studies CO2 fixation from biogas-combustion exhaust. It does not establish the full list of effective applications: in particular, it does not show waste or sewage-sludge neutralisation or biogas upgrading, and using leachate as a growth medium is not the same as demonstrating its treatment. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The reported inlet CO2 concentration differs from the measured exhaust-gas value
MajorThe conclusion says CO2 was reduced from 13 ± 1%, but Table 1 reports 15.7 ± 1.9% for the V2 inflow. These are different starting concentrations for the reported capture result.
“The cyanobacteria effectively captured the CO2 from the biogas combustion, and its concentration was reduced from 13 ± 1% to 1.3 ± 0.7%.”
“| CO2 | % | 0.040 ± 0.002 | 0.031 ± 0.002 | 15.7 ± 1.9 | 1.3 ± 0.7 |”
V2 is reported to have both a strong correlation and no relationship
MinorThe same sentence assigns V2 a strong relationship between outlet CO2 concentration and pH (R2 = 0.9421) and then says there is no relationship between those factors in V2 (R2 = 0.2302).
“In V2, when exhaust gases were used, a strong correlation (R 2 = 0.9421) was found between the CO2 concentration at the outflow from the V-PBR and the recorded pH”
“while in V2, no relationship was found between these two monitored factors (R 2 = 0.2302)”
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: Potential carbon dioxide fixation by industrially important microalgae
Sydney, E. B., Sturm, W., de Carvalho, J. C., Thomaz-Soccol, V., Larroche, C., Pandey, A., & Soccol, C. R. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.088 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
RetractedCO2 bio-mitigation using microalgae
Wang, B., Li, Y., Wu, N., & Lan, C. Q. (2008) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-008-1518-y · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Carbon dioxide storage through mineral carbonation
Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó., Sigfússon, B., Marieni, C., Goldberg, D., Gislason, S. R., & Oelkers, E. H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-019-0011-8 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Gür, T. M. (2021) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100965 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Biosequestration of atmospheric CO2 and flue gas-containing CO2 by microalgae
Cheah, W. Y., Show, P. L., Chang, J.-S., Ling, T. C., & Juan, J. C. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.026 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Perspectives on Microalgal CO2-Emission Mitigation Systems—A Review
Ho, S.-H., Chen, C.-Y., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2011) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.001 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Madejski, P., Chmiel, K., Subramanian, N., & Kuś, T. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15030887 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Sovacool, B. K., Griffiths, S., Kim, J., & Bazilian, M. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110759 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Microalgae as feed ingredients for livestock production and meat quality: A review
Madeira, M. S., Cardoso, C., Lopes, P. A., Coelho, D., Afonso, C., Bandarra, N. M., & Prates, J. A. M. (2017) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2017.09.020 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Siddiki, S. Y. A., Mofijur, M., Kumar, P. S., Ahmed, S. F., Inayat, A., Kusumo, F., Badruddin, I. A., Khan, T. M. Y., Nghiem, L. D., Ong, H. C., et al. (2021) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121782 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
The potential of microalgae and their biopolymers as structuring ingredients in food: A review
Bernaerts, T. M. M., Gheysen, L., Foubert, I., Hendrickx, M. E., & Van Loey, A. M. (2019) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107419 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Ramanan, R., Kannan, K., Deshkar, A., Yadav, R., & Chakrabarti, T. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.061 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Prasad, R., Gupta, S. K., Shabnam, N., Oliveira, C. Y. B., Nema, A. K., Ansari, F. A., & Bux, F. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132313061 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Utilization of Simulated Flue Gas for Cultivation of Scenedesmus Dimorphus
Jiang, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Shen, S., & Liu, T. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.119 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
How to Store CO2 Underground: Insights from early-mover CCS Projects
Ringrose, P. (2020) · SpringerBriefs in earth sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33113-9 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Sukenik, A., & Kaplan, A. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9071472 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Current and future perspectives on catalytic-based integrated carbon capture and utilization
Sabri, M. A., Jitan, S. A., Bahamón, D., Vega, L. F., & Palmisano, G. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148081 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Nutrient Dynamics for Sustainable Crop Production
(2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8660-2 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Riboflavin, niacin, folate and vitamin B12 in commercial microalgae powders
Edelmann, M., Aalto, S., Chamlagain, B., Kariluoto, S., & Piironen, V. (2019) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2019.05.009 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
State-of-the-art review on capture of CO2 using adsorbents prepared from waste materials
Ochedi, F. O., Liu, Y., & Adewuyi, Y. G. (2020) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.03.036 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Microalgae as Biofertilizers: A Sustainable Way to Improve Soil Fertility and Plant Growth
Gonçalves, J., Freitas, J., Fernandes, I. A., & Silva, P. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151612413 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
A review on microalgal culture to treat anaerobic digestate food waste effluent
Chuka-ogwude, D., Ogbonna, J. C., & Moheimani, N. R. (2020) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2020.101841 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Nguyen, L. N., Vu, M. T. T., Vu, H. P., Johir, M. A. H., Labeeuw, L., Ralph, P. J., Mahlia, T. M. I., Pandey, A., Sirohi, R., & Nghiem, L. D. (2022) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2022.2047141 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Poria, V., Dębiec-Andrzejewska, K., Fiodor, A., Lyzohub, M., Ajijah, N., Singh, S., & Pranaw, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.999866 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
CO2 Sequestration Overview in Geological Formations: Trapping Mechanisms Matrix Assessment
Hameli, F. A., Belhaj, H. A., & Aldhuhoori, M. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15207805 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Spirulina platensis Protein as Sustainable Ingredient for Nutritional Food Products Development
Ramírez-Rodrigues, M. M., Estrada-Beristain, C., Metri-Ojeda, J., Pérez-Alva, A., & Baigts-Allende, D. K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126849 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
CO2 capture and storage monitoring based on remote sensing techniques: A review
Zhang, T., Zhang, W., Yang, R., Liu, Y., & Jafari, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124409 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Rempel, A., Sossella, F. D. S., Margarites, A. C., Astolfi, A. L., Steinmetz, R. L. R., Kunz, A., Treichel, H., & Colla, L. M. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121588 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Stress Tolerance in Cyanobacteria under Extreme Conditions
Yadav, P., Singh, R. P., Rana, S., Joshi, D., Kumar, D., Bhardwaj, N., Gupta, R. K., & Kumar, A. (2022) · Stresses · doi:10.3390/stresses2040036 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Biodegradation of Hemicellulose-Cellulose-Starch-Based Bioplastics and Microbial Polyesters
Abe, M. M., Branciforti, M. C., & Brienzo, M. (2021) · Recycling · doi:10.3390/recycling6010022 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Algal Biomass from Wastewater and Flue Gases as a Source of Bioenergy
Lage, S., Gojkovic, Ž., Funk, C., & Gentili, F. G. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11030664 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Sun, X., Alcalde, J., Bakhtbidar, M., Elío, J., Vilarrasa, V., Canal‐Vila, J., Ballesteros, J., Heinemann, N., Haszeldine, S., Cavanagh, A., et al. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117418 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Ai, X., Yu, P., Li, X., Lai, X., Yang, M., Liu, F., Luan, F., & Meng, X. (2023) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123211 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(Testo Ltd., Alton, UK, certi fi cate of Volatile solids (VS)—gravimetric method, chlorophyll a—fluorescence method (Algae Online Analyser bbe Moldanke, Schwentinental, Germany) and gas composition—Agilent with TCD detector, Testo 340 Analyser (Testo Ltd., Alton, UK, certificate of conformity”
MethodSoil Carbon Sequestration in Crop Production
Meena, R. S., Kumar, S., & Yadav, G. S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8660-2_1 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Chen, J., Dai, L., Mataya, D., Cobb, K., Chen, P., & Ruan, R. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128188 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Improving the economic viability of these systems is achieved by using waste, including waste water and waste gases, as basic components of the growing medium [35].”
BackgroundNew trends in bioprocesses for lignocellulosic biomass and CO2 utilization
Mussatto, S. I., Yamakawa, C. K., van der Maas, L. N. L., & Dragone, G. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111620 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Harvesting Microalgae for Food and Energy Products
Liber, J. A., Bryson, A. E., Bonito, G. M., & Du, Z. (2020) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.202000349 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Abdel-Latif, H. M. R., El-Ashram, S., Yilmaz, S., Naiel, M. A. E., Abdul Kari, Z., Hamid, N. K. A., Dawood, M. A. O., Nowosad, J., & Kucharczyk, D. (2022) · Aquaculture Reports · doi:10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101135 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Borowski, P. F. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15051928 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Characterizing emulsion properties of microalgal and cyanobacterial protein isolates
Teuling, E., Schrama, J. W., Gruppen, H., & Wierenga, P. A. (2019) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101471 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Chen, H., Yang, T., Chen, M.-J., Chang, Y., Lin, C.-Y., Wang, E. I., Ho, C., Huang, K.-M., Yu, C.-C., Yang, F., et al. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.106 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Molahid, V. L. M., Kusin, F. M., Hasan, S. N. M. S., Ramli, N. A. A., & Abdullah, A. M. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10020432 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Alturki, A. A. (2022) · ChemEngineering · doi:10.3390/chemengineering6030044 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Markou, G., Kougia, E., Arapoglou, D., Chentir, I., Andreou, V., & Tzovenis, I. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10020233 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Zaki, M. A., Ashour, M., Heneash, A. M. M., Mabrouk, M. M., Alprol, A. E., Khairy, H. M., Nour, A., Mansour, A. T., Hassanien, H. A., Gaber, A., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041769 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Effects of bisulfite and sulfite on the microalga Botryococcus braunii
Yang, S., Wang, J., Cong, W., Cai, Z., & Ouyang, F. (2004) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.03.014 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Jiajia, Y., Hu, H., Wu, X., Wang, C., Zhou, T., Liu, Y., Ruan, R. R., & Zheng, H. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121420 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Farooq, W., Naqvi, S. R., Sajid, M., Shrivastav, A., & Kumar, K. (2022) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.12.014 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production
Griffiths, G., Hossain, A. K., Sharma, V., & Duraisamy, G. (2021) · Clean Technologies · doi:10.3390/cleantechnol3040043 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Microalgae are at the top of the list of potential raw materials for the production of biofuels [37].”
BackgroundLoofah-based microalgae and cyanobacteria biocomposites for intensifying carbon dioxide capture
In-na, P., Umar, A., Wallace, A. D., Flickinger, M. C., Caldwell, G. S., & Lee, J. G. M. (2020) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101348 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Bayona-Morcillo, P. J., Plaza, B. M., Gómez-Serrano, C., Rojas, E., & Jiménez-Becker, S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-020-02192-3 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Dimitriou, K. I., Bougiatioti, A., Ramonet, M., Pierros, F., Michalopoulos, P., Liakakou, E., Solomos, S., Quéhé, P.-Y., Delmotte, M., Gerasopoulos, E., et al. (2021) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118372 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Dębowski, M., Krzemieniewski, M., Zieliński, M., & Kazimierowicz, J. (2021) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos12081031 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationField study on attached cultivation of Arthrospira (Spirulina) with carbon dioxide as carbon source
Wang, J., Cheng, W., Liu, W., Wang, H., Zhang, D., Qiao, Z., Jin, G., & Liu, T. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.099 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Compost versus biogas treatment of sewage sludge dilemma assessment using life cycle analysis
Georgali, P., Kylili, A., Fokaides, P. A., & Papadopoulos, A. M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131490 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Analysis of Technologies for Carbon Dioxide Capture from the Air
Leonzio, G., Fennell, P. S., & Shah, N. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12168321 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Zieliński, D., Frączyk, J., Dębowski, M., Zieliński, M., Kaminski, Z. J., Kręgiel, D., Jacob, C., & Kolesińska, B. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25081790 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationFang, F., Gao, Y., Gan, L., He, X., & Yang, L. (2018) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-018-1394-5 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Park, S., Ahn, Y., Pandi, K., Ji, M.-K., Yun, H.-S., & Choi, J.-Y. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12183497 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Biogas Production from Microalgae (Spirulina platensis) in a Two Stage Anaerobic System
Varol, A., & Uğurlu, A. (2015) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-015-9442-8 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Circular biomanufacturing through harvesting solar energy and CO2
Sørensen, M., Andersen‐Ranberg, J., Hankamer, B. D., & Møller, B. L. (2022) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.03.001 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Chunzhuk, E. A., Grigorenko, A. V., Chernova, N. I., Киселева, С. В., Ryndin, K. G., Попель, О. С., Malaniy, S. Y., Slavkina, O. V., Neves, F. D. F., Leng, L., et al. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16020822 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Magro, F. G., Margarites, A. C., Reinehr, C. O., Gonçalves, G. C., Rodigheri, G., Costa, J. A. V., & Colla, L. M. (2017) · Environmental Technology · doi:10.1080/09593330.2017.1340352 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Estrada-Graf, A., Hernández, S., & Morales, M. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08240-2 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Dębowski, M., Michalski, R. S., Zieliński, M., & Kazimierowicz, J. (2021) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos12091099 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationKrzemińska, I., Oleszek, M., & Wiącek, D. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24193582 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Arthrospira platensis as a Feasible Feedstock for Bioethanol Production
Gonzalez Bautista, E., & Laroche, C. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11156756 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Cabrerizo, M. J., Medina‐Sánchez, J. M., González‐Olalla, J. M., Sánchez-Gómez, D., & Carrillo, P. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151491 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Management of Dark Fermentation Broth via Bio Refining and Photo Fermentation
Kucharska, K., Makoś‐Chełstowska, P., Słupek, E., & Gębicki, J. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14196268 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Mendoza, Á., Morales, V., Sánchez-Bayo, A., Rodrı́guez, R., González‐Fernández, C., Bautista, L. F., & Vicente, G. (2019) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2019.107428 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Cheng, J., Zhang, Z., & Liu, J. (2020) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2020.02.003 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Zieliński, M., Dębowski, M., & Kazimierowicz, J. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15082912 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationA Review on Synchronous Microalgal Lipid Enhancement and Wastewater Treatment
Barua, V. B., & Munir, M. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14227687 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Vlaskin, M. S., Киселева, С. В., Chernova, N. I., Grigorenko, A. V., Ryndin, K. G., Попель, О. С., Malaniy, S. Y., Slavkina, O. V., Neves, F. D. F., & Kumar, V. (2023) · Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1134/s0040601523050075 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Waditee‐Sirisattha, R., & Kageyama, H. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-96106-6.00011-3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
de Morais, M. G., Vargas, B. P., Vaz, B. D. S., Cardias, B. B., & Costa, J. A. V. (2021) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-021-02220-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Zieliński, M., Kazimierowicz, J., & Dębowski, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite · doi:10.31083/j.fbe1501003 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationAir Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Emissions: Implications in Food Production and Food Security
Kaur, H. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4482-5_6 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Algae and Cyanobacteria Communities
Wehr, J. D., & van Vuuren, S. J. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822701-5.00017-3 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Cyanoprokaryotes and algae: classification and habitats
Saber, A. A., El-Refaey, A. A., Saber, H., Singh, P. K., van Vuuren, S. J., & Cantonati, M. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823764-9.00024-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Anaerobic digester biogas upgrading using microalgae
Venkiteshwaran, K., Xie, T., Seib, M. D., Tale, V. P., & Zitomer, D. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-85859-5.00004-x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Liu, S.-Y., Zhao, R.-Z., Qiu, X.-C., & Guo, Q. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w14060928 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Biological processes for CO2 capture
Guduru, R. K., Gupta, A. A., & Dixit, U. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-89782-2.00008-9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A Perspective on Sustainable Ecology in the Light of the Qur'an
ARICI, H. Y., & Hacer, A. K. (2022) · OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.26466/opusjsr.1093375 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Marine Bioprospecting to Improve Knowledge of the Biological Sciences and Industrial Processes
Morgado, F. M. R., & Vieira, L. R. (2021) · Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95864-4_117 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Timm, W. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-159381/v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Why We Need Engineered Geological Storage of CO2
Ringrose, P. (2020) · SpringerBriefs in earth sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33113-9_1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Kaur, H. (2022). Greenhouse Gases: Sources, Sinks and Mitigation, Springer.
- Guduru, R.K., Gupta, A.A., and Dixit, U. (2022). Emerging Carbon Capture Technologies towards a Sustainable Future, Elsevier.
- Morgado, F., and Vieira, L.R. (2021). Affordable and Clean Energy, Springer.
- Venkiteshwaran, K., Xie, T., Seib, M., Tale, V.P., and Zitomer, D. (2022). Integrated Wastewater Management and Valorization Using Algal Cultures, Elsevier.
- Wehr, J., and Janse van Vuuren, S. (2024). Wetzel’s Limnology, Academic Press.
- Saber, A.A., El-Refaey, A.A., Saber, H., Singh, P., van Vuuren, S.J., and Cantonati, M. (2022). Handbook of Algal Biofuels, Elsevier.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hosny, S., Elshobary, M. E., & El-Sheekh, M. M. (2025) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-025-35885-8 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Kasiński, S., & Dębowski, M. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17184704 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationDębowski, M., Kazimierowicz, J., & Zieliński, M. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15137324 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationZieliński, M., Rusanowska, P., Dudek, M., Starowicz, A., Barczak, Ł., & Dębowski, M. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17102296 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationZieliński, M., Kisielewska, M., Talpalaru, A., Rusanowska, P., Kazimierowicz, J., & Dębowski, M. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18164352 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCatalytic CO2 fixation in microalgae Arthrospira platensis using direct flue gas
Farhad, N., Karimi, J., & Hafizi, A. (2025) · Environmental Challenges · doi:10.1016/j.envc.2025.101213 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dębowski, M., Kazimierowicz, J., Świca, I., & Zieliński, M. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17198612 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationGrowth of Limnospira platensis Under Elevated CO2 with the Addition of Sodium Selenite
Grigorenko, A. V., Kovalenko, E. M., Vavilkina, M. E., Kravets, M. A., & Vlaskin, M. S. (2026) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants15162472 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Carbon dioxide capture and utilization using microalgae
Leal, V. L., Alves, G., Behling, M., & Schneider, R. D. C. D. S. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34082-6.00011-8
Amrulloh, M., Dewi, R., Rahman, D. Y., & Susanti, H. (2026) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-026-04909-y
Kovalenko, E. M., Vavilkina, M. E., Grigorenko, A. V., Kravets, M. A., & Vlaskin, M. S. (2026) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants15182804
Ghoreyshi, T. S., & Naeimpoor, F. (2026) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2026.104953
Vavilkina, M. E., Kovalenko, E. M., Kravets, M. A., Grigorenko, A. V., & Vlaskin, M. S. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su182110895
- Authors
- Dębowski, M., Zieliński, M., Vdovychenko, A., & Kazimierowicz, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
- National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” (UA)
- Bialystok University of Technology (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Dębowski, Marcin
- Venue
- Processes
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-02-16
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 396
- ISSN
- 2227-9717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391879318
- Semantic Scholar
- 626a1a85547135c9eec5d58b126e056e02f60e29
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Warmia and Mazury (29.610.023-110, WZ/WB-IIŚ/3/2022)
- Minister of Education and Science (29.610.023-110, WZ/WB-IIŚ/3/2022)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Keywords
- Spirulina platensis, cyanobacteria, CO2 fixation, carbon dioxide removal, microalgae cultivation, photobioreactors, CO2 emission reduction, pH reduction, growth phase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review