Cited by 11Cancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSexual function and dysfunction studies

A Systematic Review Exploring the Effectiveness of Mindfulness for Sexual Functioning in Women with Cancer

Open access
Banbury, Samantha, Chandler, Chris, Lusher, Joanne·2023·Psych

Abstract

Sexual intimacy is a basic human need that is associated with quality of life whereby its absence can significantly impact both interpersonal and personal wellbeing. This systematic review aimed to provide an up-to-date evaluation of the available literature on mindfulness treatments for sexual functioning in women diagnosed with cancer. Electronic searches including PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and registered clinical trials yielded 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that treatment intervention designs varied and included mixed methods, randomised clinical trials, single arm non-randomised trials and those with the absence of any control. Furthermore, both brief and longer-term mindfulness interventions were trialled across different sexual domains. Whilst inconclusive, mindfulness-based interventions appear to support sexual function and quality of life in both early- and post-cancer survivors. However, in some instances, there were outcome inconsistencies in sexual desire, arousal and orgasm. This review has identified a current shortage in research on the effectiveness of mindfulness-based treatments for supporting sexual functioning in women with cancer; and so far, no research has been conducted in palliative care. This unmet need in supporting sexual functioning in women with cancer, including palliative care, carries important implications for both psychosexual and oncological healthcare services as sexual intimacy does not end with cancer diagnosis or prognosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/psych5010015

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oncology trials combining self-care and self-hypnosis report sustained improvements in fatigue, sleep, and distress.

    “while oncology trials combining self-care and self-hypnosis report sustained improvements in fatigue, sleep, and distress (37).”

    From Mindfulness and clinical hypnotherapy in sexual desire disorders: mechanisms, psychophysiological pathways, and integrative therapeutic sequencing (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports reduced fatigue in cancer patients receiving mindfulness therapy and reduced distress in a mindfulness pilot study, with benefits continuing at three-month follow-up. It does not describe trials combining self-care and self-hypnosis or report improved sleep, so those parts of the claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence from adjacent medical domains supports mechanistic plausibility regarding stress regulation and attentional modulation.

    “Evidence from adjacent medical domains supports mechanistic plausibility regarding stress regulation and attentional modulation (15, 19, 27, 34, 36, 37).”
  • Most of the evidence supporting hypnosis derives from adjacent domains involving procedural distress, expectancy modulation, and stress regulation.

    “Most of the evidence supporting hypnosis derives from adjacent domains involving procedural distress, expectancy modulation, and stress regulation (15, 27, 36, 37).”

    From Mindfulness and clinical hypnotherapy in sexual desire disorders: mechanisms, psychophysiological pathways, and integrative therapeutic sequencing (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction and Results discuss mindfulness interventions for sexual functioning in women with cancer, not evidence supporting hypnosis. Searches for hypnosis, procedural distress, expectancy modulation, and stress regulation found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banbury, S., Chandler, C., & Lusher, J.
Affiliations
  • London Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Regent's University London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lusher, Joanne
Venue
Psych
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-02-20
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
194-208
ISSN
2624-8611 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321456791
Cited by
11
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psych (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, sexual function, women with cancer, sexual desire, sexual arousal, orgasm, quality of life, cancer survivors, palliative care, sexual intimacy, psychosexual health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review