Cited by 69Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo Effect

Brain and behavior changes associated with an abbreviated 4-week mindfulness-based stress reduction course in back pain patients

Open access
Braden, B. Blair, Pipe, Teri B., Smith, Ryan, Glaspy, Tyler K., Deatherage, Brandon R., Baxter, Leslie C.·2016·Brain and Behavior

Abstract

Introduction: Mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) reduces depression, anxiety, and pain for people suffering from a variety of illnesses, and there is a growing need to understand the neurobiological networks implicated in self‐reported psychological change as a result of training. Combining complementary and alternative treatments such as MBSR with other therapies is helpful; however, the time commitment of the traditional 8‐week course may impede accessibility. This pilot study aimed to (1) determine if an abbreviated MBSR course improves symptoms in chronic back pain patients and (2) examine the neural and behavioral correlates of MBSR treatment. Methods: Participants were assigned to 4 weeks of weekly MBSR training (n = 12) or a control group (stress reduction reading; n = 11). Self‐report ratings and task‐based functional MRI were obtained prior to, and after, MBSR training, or at a yoked time point in the control group. Results: While both groups showed significant improvement in total depression symptoms, only the MBSR group significantly improved in back pain and somatic‐affective depression symptoms. The MBSR group also uniquely showed significant increases in regional frontal lobe hemodynamic activity associated with gaining awareness to changes in one's emotional state. Conclusions: An abbreviated MBSR course may be an effective complementary intervention that specifically improves back pain symptoms and frontal lobe regulation of emotional awareness, while the traditional 8‐week course may be necessary to detect unique improvements in total anxiety and cognitive aspects of depression.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

An abbreviated 4-week MBSR course in chronic back pain patients was associated with unique improvements in back pain and somatic-affective depression symptoms, plus increased frontal-lobe BOLD activity during a sadness-awareness task. The pilot was small and pseudorandomized, and benefits were not maintained at 1-year follow-up.

Key findings

  • Only the MBSR group significantly improved in self-reported back pain (Oswestry: t(9)=2.30, P=0.04, d=0.28); half of MBSR participants reached a clinically significant 4+ point Oswestry improvement versus 18% of controls.
  • Both groups improved in total depression symptoms (MBSR: t(11)=2.30, P=0.04, d=0.58; RCon: t(10)=2.27, P=0.047, d=0.36), but only MBSR significantly improved BDI-II Somatic-Affective symptoms (t(11)=2.61, P=0.024, d=0.57); RCon significantly improved Cognitive symptoms (t(10)=2.75, P=0.02, d=0.53). Neither group significantly improved anxiety.
  • MBSR uniquely showed significant post-pre increases in left sgACC (t(11)=20.37, P=0.0009, d=1.68), right sgACC (t(11)=7.53, P=0.019, d=1.06), and left vlPFC (t(11)=4.95, P=0.032, d=1.04) during the sadness induction task; postintervention left sgACC BOLD correlated with sad valence ratings (r(10)=0.65, P=0.021).
  • At approximately 1-year follow-up, neither group maintained significant within-group improvement on Oswestry or BDI-II.

Methods

  • Pilot study with 26 right-handed chronic low back pain patients recruited; 12 MBSR and 11 reading control completed pre/post assessments. Participants were pseudorandomly assigned to 4 weeks of weekly 2-hour MBSR sessions or a stress-reduction reading control.
  • Self-report measures were BDI-II, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Oswestry Low Back Pain Scale before and after intervention. fMRI included a validated sadness induction task and a control vision task; analyses used ROI BOLD signal in sgACC, AI, dmPFC, and vlPFC.
  • Statistical analyses used ANOVA for group effects and paired t-tests for within-group pre-post changes, with Fisher’s protected t-test and planned contrasts; intention-to-treat was handled with last observation carried forward.

Limitations

  • The paper states limitations including small sample size, pseudorandom assignment with possible selection bias, groups appearing somewhat dissimilar at baseline, difficulty blinding/placebo control, possible expectation effects, no matching/control for medication or other behavior changes, and a non-significant correlation between neural activity changes and back pain improvement.
  • The paper also states that the 4-week intervention did not show maintained long-term benefits on pain or depression, and that a larger fully randomized trial is needed.
  • Evident from the text: there were no significant group-by-time interactive effects, so most reported improvements reflect within-group changes; baseline anxiety was significantly higher in the MBSR group, and the control group also improved on total depression and cognitive depression symptoms.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/brb3.443

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 59 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Only the MBSR group significantly improved in somatic-affective depression symptoms from pre- to post-intervention.

    “only the MBSR group significantly improved in back pain and somatic‐affective depression symptoms”
    • Also stated in: § Participants and survey measures · plain
      “the MBSR group showed significant improvement in the Somatic‐Affective Subscale [t(11) = 2.61; P = 0.024; d = 0.57; Fig. 1B]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Both the MBSR and the RCon groups showed significant improvement in total depression symptoms from pre- to post-intervention.

    “While both groups showed significant improvement in total depression symptoms”
    • Also stated in: § Participants and survey measures · plain
      “Both the MBSR and the RCon groups improved in total depression symptoms [BDI‐II; MBSR: t(11) = 2.30; P = 0.04; d = 0.58; RCon: t(10) = 2.27; P = 0.047); d = 0.36; Fig. 1A].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Only the MBSR group significantly improved in self-reported back pain from pre- to post-intervention.

    “only the MBSR group significantly improved in back pain”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Preintervention, there were no significant between-group differences in BOLD signal.

    “Preintervention, there were no significant between‐group differences in BOLD signal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the MBSR group, left sgACC activation significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention.

    “The mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) group showed significant increases in left sgACC (B), right sgACC (C), and left vlPFC (D) from pre‐ to post‐intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    For anxiety, both groups' mean scores were below the clinically significant cutoff mark of 40, although the MBSR group had a mean score of 39, representing borderline clinical significance.

    “For anxiety, both group's mean scores were below the clinically significant cutoff mark of 40 although the MBSR group had a mean score of 39, representing borderline clinical significance (Julian 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Julian 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were no interactive effects of group on BOLD signal; all subsequent analyses reflect within-group changes pre- to post-intervention.

    “There were also no interactive effects of group; therefore, all subsequent analyses reflect within‐group changes pre‐ to post‐intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Postintervention, the MBSR mean BDI-II score fell into the mild mood disturbance category, and the RCon mean was within the normal disturbances category.

    “Postintervention, the MBSR mean BDI‐II score fell into the “mild mood disturbance” category, and the RCon mean was within the “normal disturbances” category.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Time and ratings did not significantly change within groups from pre- to post-intervention nor differ between-groups at the preintervention scan.

    “Time and ratings did not significantly change within groups from pre‐ to post‐intervention nor differ between‐groups at the preintervention scan.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On the control task, strong BOLD signal in the visual cortex was observed with no interactive effects of group or within-group changes pre- to post-intervention.

    “On the “control” task, strong BOLD signal in the visual cortex was observed with no interactive effects of group or within‐group changes pre‐ to post‐intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Despite improvement after MBSR training, both treatment and control groups remained in the moderate disability category according to Oswestry scores.

    “Despite improvement after MBSR training, both treatment and control groups remained in the “moderate disability” category according to Oswestry scores (see Table S2 for number of participants within each symptom category pre‐ and post‐intervention).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Preintervention, both groups showed elevated depression symptoms; the MBSR group was in the borderline clinical depression category and the RCon group in the mild mood disturbance category.

    “Preintervention, both groups showed elevated depression symptoms based on a five‐category severity system; the mean BDI‐II score placed the MBSR group as “borderline clinical depression” while the RCon mean score was in the “mild mood disturbance” category (Kress et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kress et al. 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Mean scores on the Oswestry self-report of back pain placed both groups in the moderate disability category.

    “Mean scores on the Oswestry self‐report of back pain placed both groups in the “moderate disability” category.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were no interactive effects of group; all subsequent analyses reflect within-group changes pre- to post-intervention.

    “There were no interactive effects of group; therefore, all subsequent analyses reflect within‐group changes pre‐ to post‐intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    42% of MBSR participants attained a 50% reduction in depression symptoms, while only 18% of the control group reached this level.

    “The same pattern was observed for the BDI‐II, with more (42%) MBSR participants attaining a 50% reduction in depression symptoms while only 18% reached this level of improvement in the control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The MBSR intervention led to unique improvements in back pain symptoms, as evident in the significant improvement in the MBSR group only.

    “The MBSR intervention led to unique improvements in back pain symptoms, as evident in the significant improvement in the MBSR group only.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    MBSR intervention uniquely led to greater activity of the sgACC while gaining conscious access to changes in emotion.

    “We found that MBSR intervention uniquely led to greater activity of the sgACC and vlPFC while gaining conscious access to changes in emotion, as well as a greater relationship between activity in sgACC (associated with generating emotional reactions) and changes in self‐reported emotional states.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Half of the MBSR participants reached the 4+ point Oswestry improvement threshold, while only 18% of the control group reached this level.

    “Half of the MBSR participants reached this threshold of improvement, while only 18% reached this level of improvement in the control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    MBSR intervention uniquely led to greater activity of the vlPFC while gaining conscious access to changes in emotion.

    “We found that MBSR intervention uniquely led to greater activity of the sgACC and vlPFC while gaining conscious access to changes in emotion, as well as a greater relationship between activity in sgACC (associated with generating emotional reactions) and changes in self‐reported emotional states.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    An abbreviated MBSR course may be an effective complementary intervention that specifically improves back pain symptoms and frontal lobe regulation of emotional awareness.

    “An abbreviated MBSR course may be an effective complementary intervention that specifically improves back pain symptoms and frontal lobe regulation of emotional awareness”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is a clear positive relationship in severity between chronic back pain and depression.

    “Approximately 50% of chronic back pain patients experience concomitant depression, and there is a clear positive relationship in severity between the two conditions (Rush et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rush et al. 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Approximately 50% of chronic back pain patients experience concomitant depression.

    “Approximately 50% of chronic back pain patients experience concomitant depression, and there is a clear positive relationship in severity between the two conditions (Rush et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rush et al. 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mood disturbances, particularly depression and anxiety, are both risk factors for, and the result of, chronic back pain.

    “Mood disturbances, particularly depression and anxiety, are both risk factors for, and the result of, chronic back pain (Linton 2000; Rush et al. 2000; Gerhardt et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Linton 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rush et al. 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gerhardt et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies suggest that abbreviated MBSR courses improve symptoms of depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer patients, primary care clinicians, and an inner city population.

    “Although few in number, previous studies suggest that abbreviated MBSR courses improve symptoms of depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer patients (Stafford et al. 2015), primary care clinicians (Fortney et al. 2013), and an inner city population (Smith et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Stafford et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fortney et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smith et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Three participants (one MBSR, two RCon) withdrew from the study prior to undergoing the postintervention assessment.

    “Three participants (one MBSR, two RCon) withdrew from the study prior to undergoing the postintervention assessment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Most fMRI studies of pain regulation have focused on tasks that provoke exteroceptive pain in healthy individuals, rather than tasks involving emotional processing in patients with chronic pain.

    “However, to date, most fMRI studies of pain regulation have focused on tasks that provoke exteroceptive pain in healthy individuals, rather than tasks involving emotional processing in patients with chronic pain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Emotional and cognitive reactivity were identified as the strongest and most consistent psychological constructs to mediate mindfulness-related benefits.

    “In a recent meta‐analysis across diverse populations, emotional and cognitive reactivity were identified as the strongest and the most consistent psychological constructs to mediate mindfulness‐related benefits (Gu et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gu et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Complete randomization was not achieved; some participants were assigned to the MBSR group based on their ability to attend all four MBSR training sessions.

    “While complete randomization was intended, study size, timing of the class, and the abbreviated nature of the class made it necessary to assign some participants to the MBSR group based on their ability to attend all four MBSR training sessions, occurring once a week for 4 weeks”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Patients with depression show functional changes in brain regions associated with appraising the emotional significance of one's situation (sgACC) and with perception of the bodily emotional reactions that those appraisals provoke (AI).

    “patients with depression show functional changes in brain regions associated with both appraising the emotional significance of one's situation (subgenual ACC; sgACC) and with perception of the bodily emotional reactions that those appraisals provoke (AI; Price and Drevets 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Price and Drevets 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MBSR intervention studies in back pain patients show demonstrably favorable outcomes on pain severity, functional limitations due to pain, acceptance of chronic pain, physical functioning, and depression.

    “Mindfulness‐based stress reduction intervention studies in back pain patients show demonstrably favorable outcomes on pain severity, functional limitations due to pain, acceptance of chronic pain, physical functioning, and depression (Morone et al. 2008; Rosenzweig et al. 2010; Schutze et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Morone et al. 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rosenzweig et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schutze et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    These psychological processes may correspond to brain regions implicated in emotion regulation, including the ventrolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and subcortical regions.

    “These psychological processes may correspond to brain regions implicated in emotion regulation, including the ventrolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices (vlPFC and dmPFC), anterior insula (AI), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), as well as subcortical regions (Ochsner and Gross 2005; Ochsner et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ochsner and Gross 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ochsner et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Both the focused attention and open monitoring aspects of meditation lead to alterations in frontal and other regions during anticipation of pain.

    “Zeidan et al. (2010) reviewed brain mechanisms associated with mindfulness meditation in pain regulation, finding support that both the focused attention and open monitoring aspects of meditation lead to alterations in frontal and other regions during anticipation of pain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeidan et al. (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The risk-to-benefit ratio for many surgical interventions for chronic back pain is unfavorable.

    “the risk‐to‐benefit ratio for many surgical interventions is unfavorable (Chou et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chou et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    There is no evidence that the Control Vision Task would influence findings on the Sadness Induction Task.

    “All participants received this Control Vision Task first in the scanner, before the Sadness Induction Task, and there is no evidence that the Control Vision Task would influence findings on the Sadness Induction Task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Control Vision Task is stable over time and unaffected by the intervention.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    No between-group differences in age or years of education were observed.

    “No between‐group differences in age [t(21) = 0.62; P = 0.54] or years of education [t(21) = 0.08; P = 0.94] were observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Of the RCon group, seven participants reported reading the material.

    “Of the RCon group, seven participants reported reading the material.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The sadness induction task was previously validated.

    “We used a previously validated sadness induction task to focus on neural changes related to becoming aware of one's current emotional state (Smith et al. 2011, 2014b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smith et al. 2014b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Given the small sample size, Fisher's protected t-test with planned contrast was used to minimize Type I and II errors and control for family-wise error.

    “Given the small sample size, we used Fisher's protected t‐test with planned contrast, based on a priori predictions, in order to minimize both Type I and II errors and control for family‐wise error (Cohen et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen et al. 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Intention-to-treat analysis was used; participants remained in assigned groups regardless of adherence or withdrawal.

    “In fitting with intention‐to‐treat (ITT) concept, participants remained in the groups to which they were assigned, regardless of their adherence to the treatment or subsequent withdrawal from the study (Gupta 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gupta 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The MBSR group reported somewhat higher levels of depression, anxiety, and back pain, although only the between-group anxiety difference reached statistical significance.

    “The MBSR group reported somewhat higher levels of depression, anxiety, and back pain, although only the between‐group anxiety difference reached statistical significance [STAI: t(21) = 5.34; P = 0.031; Fig. 1E].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Groups were well balanced for gender and medication use to manage pain and psychiatric symptoms.

    “Groups were well balanced for gender and medication use to manage pain and psychiatric symptoms (see Table S1 for complete medication list by the participant).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The ROIs were selected because they showed a significant association with the sadness induction task in previous studies and because of their contributions to emotional/autonomic processing.

    “The ROIs were selected because these regions showed a significant association with this sadness induction task in our previous studies (Smith et al. 2011, 2014b) and because of the contributions of these regions to afferent and efferent emotional/autonomic processing, as discussed in detail elsewhere (Smith et al. 2014a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smith et al. 2014b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smith et al. 2014a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    More participants from the MBSR group did additional MBSR research and used the techniques they learned than the RCon group, and MBSR participants used the techniques at a higher frequency.

    “As expected, there were consistently more participants from the MBSR group who did additional MBSR research outside of what was provided in the study and used the techniques they learned than the RCon group. MBSR participants also used the techniques at a higher frequency than the RCon group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of unique effect on cognitive aspects of depression and anxiety suggests a cumulative dose-response aspect to MBSR intervention such that neural changes and coping with pain occur prior to changes in more enduring symptoms.

    “which suggests that there may be a cumulative dose–response aspect to MBSR intervention such that neural changes and coping with pain occur prior to changes in more enduring symptoms such as cognitive aspects of depression and anxiety, or that the intense focus on pain in these patients made changes to this symptom more evident.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The sgACC has been implicated in the representation of emotional valence, appraising the emotional significance of one's current situation, and automatically generating emotional somatic marker responses to guide decision-making.

    “The sgACC has been implicated in the representation of emotional valence (Grimm et al. 2006), appraising the emotional significance of one's current situation (Roy et al. 2012), and automatically generating emotional “somatic marker” responses to guide decision‐making (Gupta et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Grimm et al. 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Roy et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gupta et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies of the neural substrates associated with pain perception have utilized pain paradigms to determine whether MBSR alters pain tolerance as elicited by heat, cold, or electrical stimulation.

    “Previous studies of the neural substrates associated with pain perception have utilized pain paradigms to determine whether MBSR alters pain tolerance as elicited by either heat, cold, or electrical stimulation (Zeidan et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeidan et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MBSR has been effective in alleviating symptoms in anxiety disorders, but results regarding the reduction of anxiety in back pain patients have been mixed.

    “Although MBSR has been effective in alleviating symptoms in anxiety disorders, results regarding the reduction of anxiety in back pain patients have been mixed.; Schutze et al. (2014) reported no change, but Rosenzweig et al. (2010) reported reduced anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schutze et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rosenzweig et al. (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The mechanism by which MBSR changes perceived pain is quickly acquired, but also likely linked to a state effect of increased awareness, such that longer exposure to MBSR techniques provides a foundation necessary for long-term benefits of symptom improvements.

    “Our findings of improved symptoms and neural changes associated with current use suggest that the mechanism by which MBSR changes perceived pain is quickly acquired, but also likely linked to a state effect of increased awareness, such that longer exposure to MBSR techniques provides a foundation that is necessary for long‐term benefits of symptom improvements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The intense focus on pain in these patients made changes to cognitive aspects of depression and anxiety more evident.

    “which suggests that there may be a cumulative dose–response aspect to MBSR intervention such that neural changes and coping with pain occur prior to changes in more enduring symptoms such as cognitive aspects of depression and anxiety, or that the intense focus on pain in these patients made changes to this symptom more evident.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Zeidan et al. (2010) hypothesized that MBSR plays a role in altering expectancy of pain by increasing the training of reduced- or non-appraisal of nociceptive information.

    “These past studies therefore focus on the anticipatory aspects of pain regulation, and Zeidan et al. (2010) hypothesized that MBSR plays a role in altering expectancy of pain by increasing the training of “reduced‐ or non‐appraisal of nociceptive information.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeidan et al. (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The MBSR group likely had expectation to improve in symptoms.

    “The MBSR group likely had expectation to improve in symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Interpretations from this pilot study are limited by the sample size and the pseudorandom design.

    “Interpretations from this pilot study are limited by the sample size and the pseudorandom design that was necessary to ensure that all MBSR participants were able to attend sufficient sessions in this abbreviated program.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Findings from this study converge with conclusions from a recent meta-analysis and review that short-term mindfulness training is associated with increased top-down emotion regulation, while increased bottom-up emotion regulation is more likely to be observed in long-term practitioners.

    “Taken together, findings from this study converge with conclusions from a recent meta‐analysis and review, that short‐term mindfulness training is associated with increased “top‐down” emotion regulation, while increased “bottom‐up” emotion regulation is more likely to be observed in long‐term practitioners (Chiesa et al. 2013; Tang et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chiesa et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tang et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Kerr et al. (2013) postulated that over time, attentional control may become generalized to other cognitive processes subserved by regions of the prefrontal cortex.

    “Using magnetoencephalography, Kerr et al. (2013) found that the introductory technique of MBSR, the body scan, trains one to control the “attentional spotlight” within the somatosensory cortex, and postulated that over time, this attentional control may become generalized to other cognitive processes subserved by regions of the prefrontal cortex.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kerr et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    In this pilot study, we did not match participants on demographic variables, control for medication use, or control for other changes in behavior during the study.

    “In this pilot study, we did not match participants on demographic variables, control for medication use, or control for other changes in behavior that participants engaged in during the study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Farb et al. (2010) found MBSR training to be related to increased involvement of sgACC when depressed and anxious patients observed sad movie clips.

    “Consistent with this finding, Farb et al. (2010) also found MBSR training to be related to increased involvement of sgACC when depressed and anxious patients observed sad movie clips.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Farb et al. (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The groups do appear somewhat dissimilar, which is a possible problem with a small sample.

    “Although groups were not statistically significantly different in preintervention analyses for back pain, depression symptoms, or neuroimaging measures, the groups do appear somewhat dissimilar, which is a possible problem one can encounter with a small sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In healthy participants, increased blood flow in sgACC was coupled with self-reported transient sadness.

    “Others have reported this phenomenon, noting that in healthy participants increased blood flow in sgACC was coupled with self‐reported transient sadness (Mayberg et al. 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mayberg et al. 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The control group was aware they were being compared to an in-person MBSR training group, which may have created the expectation that they would experience worsening symptoms.

    “Further, the control group was aware of the fact that they were being compared to an in‐person MBSR training group, which may have created the expectation that, by comparison, they would experience worsening symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Demographic variables and medication use were strikingly equivalent between groups.

    “Demographic variables and medication use, however, were strikingly equivalent between groups (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The attentional control gained through the body scan may be particularly relevant to chronic pain patients by refocusing pain to a specific body region, rather than as an overwhelming feeling of generalized pain, which in turn may free up pain-focused attentional resources.

    “The attentional control gained through the body scan may be particularly relevant to chronic pain patients by refocusing pain to a specific body region, rather than as an overwhelming feeling of generalized pain, which in turn may “free up pain‐focused attentional resources” (Kerr et al. 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kerr et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Our findings support the hypothesis that back pain patients who received MBSR training showed reductions in perceived pain and a concomitant increase in regional prefrontal neural activity reflecting a gain in cognitive access to one's own emotional state.

    “Our findings support this hypothesis in that back pain patients who received MBSR training showed reductions in perceived pain and a concomitant increase in regional prefrontal neural activity reflecting a gain in cognitive access to one's own emotional state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Groups were not statistically significantly different in preintervention analyses for back pain, depression symptoms, or neuroimaging measures.

    “Although groups were not statistically significantly different in preintervention analyses for back pain, depression symptoms, or neuroimaging measures, the groups do appear somewhat dissimilar, which is a possible problem one can encounter with a small sample.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Holzel et al. (2013) found a similar increased coupling of vlPFC in generalized anxiety disorder patients whose anxiety was alleviated by MBSR.

    “Holzel et al. (2013) found a similar increased coupling of vlPFC in generalized anxiety disorder patients whose anxiety was alleviated by MBSR.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holzel et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    MBSR participants were very consistent in their back pain improvement, thus the restricted range and small sample size were not conducive to detecting a significant correlation.

    “MBSR participants were very consistent in their back pain improvement, thus the restricted range and small sample size were not conducive to detecting a significant correlation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Reassignment of groups based on exit survey factors did not better account for improvements in symptoms than participation in the MBSR group, making it unlikely that there were other mediating variables in symptom improvement over and above MBSR.

    “Reassignment of groups based on any of these factors did not better account for improvements in symptoms than participation in the MBSR group, making it unlikely that there were other mediating variables in symptom improvement over and above MBSR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    MBSR focuses on increasing awareness of present moment experiences.

    “From a therapeutic standpoint, MBSR focuses on increasing awareness of present moment experiences (Kabat‐Zinn 1990); therefore, increased coupling between sgACC activity and self‐reported emotional transitions may relate to core aspects of MBSR training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kabat‐Zinn 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

62 of 62
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Modeling assumed a monotonic increase from neutral to sad while viewing sad stimuli and a similar monotonic decrease from sad to neutral while subsequently viewing neutral stimuli.

    “Modeling assumed a monotonic increase from neutral to sad (while viewing sad stimuli) and a similar monotonic decrease from sad to neutral (while subsequently viewing neutral stimuli).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Control Vision Task is stable over time and unaffected by the intervention.

    “In our general study design, we included a short vision fMRI task that was hypothesized to be stable over time and unaffected by the intervention.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    This is the first study to compare an abbreviated MBSR intervention to a control group in a clinical population.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare an abbreviated MBSR intervention to a control group in a clinical population.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study in patients with back pain showed that, compared with a reading control group, an abbreviated MBSR course consisting of four weekly two-hour sessions significantly reduced back pain and increased regulation in brain areas associated with emotional awareness.

    “A study in patients with back pain showed that, compared with a reading control group, an abbreviated MBSR course consisting of four weekly two-hour sessions significantly reduced back pain and increased regulation in brain areas associated with emotional awareness [22].”

    From Feasibility and Acceptability of an Abbreviated, Four-Week Mindfulness Program for Chronic Pain Management. (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MBSR has shown efficacy in treating pain, depression, stress and anxiety.

    “Mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR), which combines meditation training and stress management practices, has shown efficacy in treating pain, depression, stress and anxiety.(25–29)”
  • A more realistic amount of practice (~20 min) is recommended for non-clinical populations.

    “Moreover, a more realistic amount of practice (~20 min) is recommended for non-clinical populations (Klatt et al., 2009; Braden et al., 2016; Schroeder et al., 2016).”
  • Most studies on short mindfulness programmes demonstrate that they are effective at improving some outcomes, particularly psychological distress, and this seems independent of the volume of the intervention and population type.

    “In fact, most of the studies on short mindfulness programmes demonstrate that they are effective at improving some outcomes (Klatt et al., 2009; Braden et al., 2016; Schroeder et al., 2016), particularly psychological distress, and this seems to be independent of the volume of the intervention (number of sessions × session length), and population type (Carmody and Baer, 2009).”

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentr(10) = 0.65reported p = .021 · recomputed p = .022

    “r(10) = 0.65, p = .021”

  • Consistentr(10) = 0.56reported p = .057 · recomputed p = .058

    “r(10) = 0.56, p = .057”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braden, B. B., Pipe, T. B., Smith, R., Glaspy, T. K., Deatherage, B. R., & Baxter, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Baxter, Leslie C.
Venue
Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-16
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
e00443-e00443
ISSN
  • 2157-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-3279
OpenAlex
W2284323509
Cited by
69
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Walton Foundation (via the Barrow Neurological Foundation)
  • Arizona Alzheimer's Disease Core Center (NIA P30 AG19610-03)
  • State of Arizona (Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, chronic back pain, depression, anxiety, emotional awareness, complementary and alternative medicine
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Awareness, Back Pain, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review