Cited by 6Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsAlgebraic and Geometric AnalysisQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics

Spin Helicity and the Disproof of Bell’s Theorem

Open access
Sanctuary, Bryan·2024·Quantum Reports

Abstract

Under the quaternion group, Q8, spin helicity emerges as a crucial element of the reality of spin and is complementary to its polarization. We show that the correlation in EPR coincidence experiments is conserved upon separation from a singlet state and distributed between its polarization and coherence. Including helicity accounts for the violation of Bell’s Inequalities without non-locality, and disproves Bell’s Theorem by a counterexample.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/quantum6030028

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EPR correlations arise naturally when both the vector and bivector dynamics are taken into account.

    “EPR correlations [42,43] arise naturally when both the vector and bivector dynamics are taken into account.”

    From The Zitterbewegung in the Bivector Standard Model (2026) · cites this paper as [42]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Griffiths, D. Introduction to Elementary Particles; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 59-60, ISBN 978-3-527-40601-2.
  2. Cabello, A. Proposed experiment to test the foundations of physics. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 72, 052112.
  3. Valentini, A. Signal-locality, uncertainty, and the sub-quantum H-theorem. Phys. Lett. A 2002, 297, 273-278.
  4. Von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1955.

Authors
Sanctuary, B.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Sanctuary, Bryan
Venue
Quantum Reports
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-08-21
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
436-441
ISSN
2624-960X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401887339
Cited by
5
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Keywords
spin helicity, Bell's theorem, Bell inequalities, EPR correlations, singlet state, quaternion group Q8, spin polarization, coherence, nonlocality, counterexample

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review