Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gated Convolutional Neural Network for Semantic Segmentation in High-Resolution Images

Open access
Wang, Hongzhen, Wang, Ying, Zhang, Qian, Xiang, Shiming, Pan, Chunhong·2017·Remote Sensing

Abstract

Semantic segmentation is a fundamental task in remote sensing image processing. The large appearance variations of ground objects make this task quite challenging. Recently, deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have shown outstanding performance in this task. A common strategy of these methods (e.g., SegNet) for performance improvement is to combine the feature maps learned at different DCNN layers. However, such a combination is usually implemented via feature map summation or concatenation, indicating that the features are considered indiscriminately. In fact, features at different positions contribute differently to the final performance. It is advantageous to automatically select adaptive features when merging different-layer feature maps. To achieve this goal, we propose a gated convolutional neural network to fulfill this task. Specifically, we explore the relationship between the information entropy of the feature maps and the label-error map, and then a gate mechanism is embedded to integrate the feature maps more effectively. The gate is implemented by the entropy maps, which are generated to assign adaptive weights to different feature maps as their relative importance. Generally, the entropy maps, i.e., the gates, guide the network to focus on the highly-uncertain pixels, where detailed information from lower layers is required to improve the separability of these pixels. The selected features are finally combined to feed into the classifier layer, which predicts the semantic label of each pixel. The proposed method achieves competitive segmentation accuracy on the public ISPRS 2D Semantic Labeling benchmark, which is challenging for segmentation by only using the RGB images.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs9050446

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Wang, 2016, Salient band selection for hyperspectral image classification via manifold ranking, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 27, 1279, 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2477537 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cheng, 2016, Accurate urban road centerline extraction from VHR imagery via multiscale segmentation and tensor voting, Neurocomputing, 205, 407, 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.04.026 · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.04.026
  3. Yuan, 2016, Dual-clustering-based hyperspectral band selection by contextual analysis, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 54, 1431, 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2480866 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2480866
  4. Matikainen, 2011, egment-based land cover mapping of a suburban area—Comparison of high-resolution remotely sensed datasets using classification trees and test field points, Remote Sens., 3, 1777, 10.3390/rs3081777 · DOI
  5. Tang, Y., and Zhang, L. (2017). Urban change analysis with multi-sensor multispectral imagery. Remote Sens., 9. · doi:10.3390/rs9030252
  6. Yuan, 2016, Hyperspectral image classification via multitask joint sparse representation and stepwise MRF optimization, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 46, 2966, 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2484324 · DOI
  7. Zhang, 2011, Mapping urbanization dynamics at regional and global scales using multi-temporal DMSP/OLS nighttime light data, Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 2320, 10.1016/j.rse.2011.04.032 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Sherrah, J. (2016). Fully convolutional networks for dense semantic labelling of highresolution aerial imagery. arXiv.
  9. Girshick, R. (2015, January 13–16). Fast r-cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014, January 8–13). Generative adversarial nets. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  11. Yang, S., Luo, P., Loy, C.C., and Tang, X. (2015, January 13–16). From facial parts responses to face detection: A deep learning approach. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Long, 2015, Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 79, 1337
  13. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
  14. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., and Sun, J. (2015, January 7–12). Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  16. Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., and Torralba, A. (2016, January 27–30). Learning deep features for discriminative localization. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ghamisi, 2015, A survey on spectral–spatial classification techniques based on attribute profiles, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 53, 2335, 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2358934 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Bruzzone, L., and Demir, B. (2014). A review of modern approaches to classification of remote sensing data. Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in Europe, Springer. · DOI
  19. Zhang, 2016, Deep learning for remote sensing data: A technical tutorial on the state of the art, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., 4, 22, 10.1109/MGRS.2016.2540798 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Paisitkriangkrai, S., Sherrah, J., Janney, P., and van-Den Hengel, A. (2015, January 7–12). Effective semantic pixel labelling with convolutional networks and Conditional Random Fields. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Boston, MA, USA. · DOI
  21. Audebert, N., Le Saux, B., and Lefevre, S. (2016, January 10–15). How useful is region-based classification of remote sensing images in a deep learning framework?. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Beijing, China. · DOI
  22. Marmanis, D., Schindler, K., Wegner, J.D., Galliani, S., Datcu, M., and Stilla, U. (2016). Classification with an edge: Improving semantic image segmentation with boundary detection. arXiv.
  23. Kampffmeyer, M., Salberg, A.B., and Jenssen, R. (2016, January 27–30). Semantic segmentation of small objects and modeling of uncertainty in urban remote sensing images using deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Seattle, WA, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Arnab, A., Jayasumana, S., Zheng, S., and Torr, P.H. (2016, January 8–16). Higher order conditional random fields in deep neural networks. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Dauphin, Y.N., Fan, A., Auli, M., and Grangier, D. (2016). Language modeling with gated convolutional networks. arXiv.
  26. Shannon, 1948, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 5, 3
  27. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv.
  28. Russakovsky, 2015, ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 115, 211, 10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · DOI · Paper page
  29. Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., and Darrell, T. (2014). Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. arXiv, 675–678. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Vedaldi, A., and Lenc, K. (2015, January 26–30). Matconvnet: Convolutional neural networks for matlab. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia, Brisbane, Australia. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Marcu, A., and Leordeanu, M. (2016). Dual local-global contextual pathways for recognition in aerial imagery. arXiv.
  32. Tschannen, M., Cavigelli, L., Mentzer, F., Wiatowski, T., and Benini, L. (2016). Deep structured features for semantic segmentation. arXiv. · doi:10.23919/eusipco.2017.8081169
  33. Piramanayagam, S., Schwartzkopf, W., Koehler, F., and Saber, E. (2016). Classification of remote sensed images using random forests and deep learning framework. Proceedings of the SPIE Remote Sensing, International Society for Optics and Photonics. · DOI
  34. Audebert, N., Saux, B.L., and Lefèvre, S. (2016). Semantic segmentation of earth observation data using multimodal and multi-scale deep networks. arXiv.

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., Xiang, S., & Pan, C.
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-05-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
446
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610528085
Cited by
201
References
12
FWCI
20.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91646207, 91338202, 91438105)
  • Beijing Natural Science Foundation (4162064)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gated Convolutional Neural Network for Semantic Segmentation in High-Resolution Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs9050446
The paper
Wang, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., Xiang, S., & Pan, C. (2017). Gated Convolutional Neural Network for Semantic Segmentation in High-Resolution Images. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050446

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.