The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
Open accessAbstract
Magnetic and inertial measurement units are an emerging technology to obtain 3D orientation of body segments in human movement analysis. In this respect, sensor fusion is used to limit the drift errors resulting from the gyroscope data integration by exploiting accelerometer and magnetic aiding sensors. The present study aims at investigating the effectiveness of sensor fusion methods under different experimental conditions. Manual and locomotion tasks, differing in time duration, measurement volume, presence/absence of static phases, and out-of-plane movements, were performed by six subjects, and recorded by one unit located on the forearm or the lower trunk, respectively. Two sensor fusion methods, representative of the stochastic (Extended Kalman Filter) and complementary (Non-linear observer) filtering, were selected, and their accuracy was assessed in terms of attitude (pitch and roll angles) and heading (yaw angle) errors using stereophotogrammetric data as a reference. The sensor fusion approaches provided significantly more accurate results than gyroscope data integration. Accuracy improved mostly for heading and when the movement exhibited stationary phases, evenly distributed 3D rotations, it occurred in a small volume, and its duration was greater than approximately 20 s. These results were independent from the specific sensor fusion method used. Practice guidelines for improving the outcome accuracy are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Measuring orientation of human body segments using miniature gyroscopes and accelerometers
Luinge, H. J., & Veltink, P. H. (2005) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02345966 · Cited by 647
Estimating Three-Dimensional Orientation of Human Body Parts by Inertial/Magnetic Sensing
Sabatini, A. M. (2011) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s110201489 · Cited by 349
Self-citationBonnet, V., Mazzà, C., McCamley, J., & Cappozzo, A. (2013) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-29 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Cited by
Qiu, S., Zhao, H., Jiang, N., Wang, Z., Liu, L., An, Y., Zhao, H., Miao, X., Liu, R., & Fortino, G. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.006 · Cited by 671
Wearable Inertial Sensors for Human Motion Analysis: A Review
Lopez-Nava, I. H., & Munoz-Melendez, A. (2016) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2016.2609392 · Cited by 263
Teufl, W., Miezal, M., Taetz, B., Fröhlich, M., & Bleser, G. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213064 · Cited by 129
Schall, M. C., Fethke, N. B., Chen, H., Oyama, S., & Douphrate, D. I. (2016) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1079335 · Cited by 96
Lebel, K., Boissy, P., Nguyen, H., & Duval, C. (2017) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-017-0347-6 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergamini, E., Ligorio, G., Summa, A., Vannozzi, G., Cappozzo, A., & Sabatini, A.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-10-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 18625-18649
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010717132
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 33.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.