Cited by 207Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GWireless Sensor Networks and IoT

Software Defined Networking for Improved Wireless Sensor Network Management: A Survey

Open access
Ndiaye, Musa, Hancke, Gerhard, Abu-Mahfouz, Adnan·2017·Sensors

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are becoming increasingly popular with the advent of the Internet of things (IoT). Various real-world applications of WSNs such as in smart grids, smart farming and smart health would require a potential deployment of thousands or maybe hundreds of thousands of sensor nodes/actuators. To ensure proper working order and network efficiency of such a network of sensor nodes, an effective WSN management system has to be integrated. However, the inherent challenges of WSNs such as sensor/actuator heterogeneity, application dependency and resource constraints have led to challenges in implementing effective traditional WSN management. This difficulty in management increases as the WSN becomes larger. Software Defined Networking (SDN) provides a promising solution in flexible management WSNs by allowing the separation of the control logic from the sensor nodes/actuators. The advantage with this SDN-based management in WSNs is that it enables centralized control of the entire WSN making it simpler to deploy network-wide management protocols and applications on demand. This paper highlights some of the recent work on traditional WSN management in brief and reviews SDN-based management techniques for WSNs in greater detail while drawing attention to the advantages that SDN brings to traditional WSN management. This paper also investigates open research challenges in coming up with mechanisms for flexible and easier SDN-based WSN configuration and management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s17051031

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scalability is a key challenge in large scale 5G-IoT due to diversity of devices and their states management.

    “Scalability and network management, in large scale 5G-IoT, the scalability is a key challenge due to the diversity of devices and their states management (Ndiaye et al., 2017;Modieginyane et al., 2018).”

    From Future Industry Internet of Things with Zero-trust Security (2024) · cites this paper as Ndiaye et al., 2017

    The Introduction and §2 (WSN Management; page unavailable) describe managing large-scale wireless sensor networks as challenging and identify scalability as a design criterion. They do not establish the more specific claim about 5G-IoT or attribute the scalability challenge to device diversity and management of device states. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]Dludla A.G. Abu-Mahfouz A.M. Kruger C.P. Isaac J.S. Wireless sensor networks testbed: ASNTbed Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE IST-Africa Conference and Exhibition (IST-Africa) Nairobi, Kenya 29–31 May 2013 1 10
  2. [2]Abu-Mahfouz A.M. Steyn L.P. Isaac S.J. Hancke G.P. Multi-Level Infrastructure of Interconnected Testbeds of Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks (MI2T-WSN) Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Networks (ICWN) Athens, Greece 1–7 January 2012 1
  3. [5]Karl H. Willig A. Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks John Wiley & Sons Chichester, UK 2007
  4. [6]Kruger C.P. Abu-Mahfouz A.M. Isaac S.J. Modulo: A modular sensor network node optimised for research and product development Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE IST-Africa Conference and Exhibition (IST-Africa) Nairobi, Kenya 29–31 May 2013 1 9
  5. [32]Song H. Kim D. Lee K. Sung J. UPnP-based sensor network management architecture Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking Osaka, Japan 13–15 April 2005
  6. [55]Levis P. Lee N. Welsh M. Culler D. TOSSIM: Accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications Proceedings of the ACM 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems Los Angeles, CA, USA 5–7 November 2003 126 137
  7. [64]Huang H. Zhu J. Zhang L. An SDN based management framework for IoT devices Proceedings of the 25th IET Irish Signals Systems Conference 2014 and 2014 China-Ireland International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies (ISSC 2014/CIICT 2014) Limerick, Ireland 26–27 June 2014 175 179
  8. [102]IEEE IEEE Standard for Information technology–Telecommunications and information Exchange between Systems—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 1: Prioritization of Management Frames IEEE Std 802.11ae-2012 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11-2012) IEEE Computer Society Los Alamitos, CA, USA 2012 1 52
  9. [113]Yu M. Jose L. Miao R. Software Defined Traffic Measurement with OpenSketch Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 13) Lombard, IL, USA 2–5 April 2013 USENIX Lombard, IL, USA 2013 29 42

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ndiaye, M., Hancke, G., & Abu-Mahfouz, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
Corresponding author
Ndiaye, Musa
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1031
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610375170
Cited by
207
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 15
FWCI
29.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT
Keywords
software-defined networking, wireless sensor networks, Internet of Things, centralized control, resource constraints, network configuration, smart grid, smart agriculture, smart healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review