Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 446

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Piezoelectric Transducer-Based Structural Health Monitoring for Aircraft Applications

Open access
Qing, Xinlin, Li, Wenzhuo, Wang, Yishou, Sun, Hu·2019·Sensors
DOI 10.3390/s19030545
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is being widely evaluated by the aerospace industry as a method to improve the safety and reliability of aircraft structures and also reduce operational cost. Built-in sensor networks on an aircraft structure can provide crucial information regarding the condition, damage state and/or service environment of the structure. Among the various types of transducers used for SHM, piezoelectric materials are widely used because they can be employed as either actuators or sensors due to their piezoelectric effect and vice versa. This paper provides a brief overview of piezoelectric transducer-based SHM system technology developed for aircraft applications in the past two decades. The requirements for practical implementation and use of structural health monitoring systems in aircraft application are then introduced. State-of-the-art techniques for solving some practical issues, such as sensor network integration, scalability to large structures, reliability and effect of environmental conditions, robust damage detection and quantification are discussed. Development trend of SHM technology is also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s19030545

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 186

  1. Aliabadi, M.H.F., and Khodaei, Z.S. (2017). Structural Health Monitoring for Advanced Composite Structures, World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd. · DOI
  2. Chang, F. (2002, January 10–12). Ultra reliable and super safe structures for the new century. Proceedings of the 1st European workshop on structural health monitoring, Paris, France.
  3. Staszewski, W., Boller, C., and Tomlinson, G.R. (2003). Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures: Smart Sensor Technologies and Signal Processing, John Wiley & Sons. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Giurgiutiu, 2002, Piezoelectric wafer embedded active sensors for aging aircraft structural health monitoring, Struct. Health Monit., 1, 41, 10.1177/147592170200100104 · DOI
  5. Ihn, 2004, Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Diagnostics, Smart Mater. Struct., 13, 609, 10.1088/0964-1726/13/3/020 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Staszewski, 2009, Health monitoring of aerospace composite structures–Active and passive approach, Compos. Sci. Technol., 69, 1678, 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.034 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Tracy, 1998, Identifying impacts in composite plates with piezoelectric strain sensors, part I: Theory, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 9, 920, 10.1177/1045389X9800901108 · doi:10.1177/1045389x9800901108
  8. Qing, 2006, An active diagnostic system for structural health monitoring of rocket engines, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 17, 619, 10.1177/1045389X06059956 · DOI
  9. Qiu, 2017, An adaptive guided wave-Gaussian mixture model for damage monitoring under time-varying conditions: Validation in a full-scale aircraft fatigue test, Struct. Health Monit., 16, 501, 10.1177/1475921717692571 · doi:10.1177/1475921717692571
  10. Grave, 2015, Measuring changing strain fields in composites with Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing using the optical backscatter reflectometer, Compos. Part. B-Eng., 74, 138, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.003 · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.003
  11. Roach, 2009, Real time crack detection using mountable comparative vacuum monitoring sensors, Smart Struct. Syst., 5, 317, 10.12989/sss.2009.5.4.317 · DOI
  12. Tserpes, 2014, Strain and damage monitoring in CFRP fuselage panels using fiber Bragg grating sensors. Part I: Design, manufacturing and impact testing, Compos. Struct., 107, 726, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.053 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.053
  13. Sun, 2018, A novel eddy current array sensing film for quantitatively monitoring hole-edge crack growth in bolted joints, Struct. Mater. Struct., 28, 015018, 10.1088/1361-665X/aae54e · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/aae54e
  14. Beard, S., Liu, B., Qing, P., and Zhang, D. (2007, January 11–13). Challenges in implementation of SHM. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  15. Lin, M., Qing, X., Kumar, A., and Beard, S.J. (2001, January 14). Smart layer and smart suitcase for structural health monitoring applications. Proceedings of the SPIE’s 8th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, USA. · DOI
  16. Christian, B., Chang, F.K., and Fujino, Y. (2009). Stanford Multiactuator–Receiver Transduction (SMART) Layer Technology and Its Applications. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, John Wiley & Sons.
  17. Qing, 2007, Built-in sensor network for structural health monitoring of composite structure, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 18, 39, 10.1177/1045389X06064353 · DOI
  18. Qing, 2006, Advances in the development of built-in diagnostic system for filament wound composite structures, Compos. Sci. Technol., 66, 1694, 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.007 · DOI
  19. Bekas, D.G., Sharif-Khodaei, Z., and Aliabadi, M.H.F. (2018). An innovative diagnostic film for structural health monitoring of metallic and composite structures. Sensors, 18. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Qing, 2008, The performance of a piezoelectric-sensor-based SHM system under a combined cryogenic temperature and vibration environment, Smart Mater. Struct., 17, 055010, 10.1088/0964-1726/17/5/055010 · DOI
  21. Liang, 1994, An impedance method for dynamic analysis of active material systems, J. Vib. Acoust., 116, 120, 10.1115/1.2930387 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Farrar, 2003, Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward, Shock Vib. Digest, 35, 451, 10.1177/05831024030356001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Budoya, 2018, A comparative study of impedance measurement techniques for structural health monitoring applications, IEEE. Trans. Instrum. Meas., 67, 912, 10.1109/TIM.2018.2792854 · doi:10.1109/tim.2018.2792854
  24. Annamdas, 2007, Three-dimensional electromechanical impedance model. II: Damage analysis and PZT characterization, J. Aerosp. Eng., 20, 63, 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:1(63) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2007)20:1(63
  25. Annamdas, 2007, Three-dimensional electromechanical impedance model. I: Formulation of directional sum impedance, J. Aerosp. Eng., 20, 53, 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:1(53) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2007)20:1(53
  26. Bhalla, 2009, Simplified impedance model for adhesively bonded piezo-impedance transducers, J. Aerosp. Eng., 22, 373, 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:4(373) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2009)22:4(373
  27. Sepehry, 2017, Discrete singular convolution and spectral finite element method for predicting electromechanical impedance applied on rectangular plates, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 28, 2473, 10.1177/1045389X17689931 · doi:10.1177/1045389x17689931
  28. Zou, 2015, A Dual Boundary Element Model for Electromechanical Impedance Based Damage Detection Applications, Key Eng. Mater., 665, 265, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.665.265 · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.665.265
  29. Zhu, 2019, A real-time electromechanical impedance-based active monitoring for composite patch bonded repair structure, Compos. Struct., 212, 513, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.035 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.035
  30. Na, W.S., and Baek, J. (2016). Impedance-based non-destructive testing method combined with unmanned aerial vehicle for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Appl. Sci., 7. · doi:10.3390/app7010015
  31. Xu, 2002, A modified electro-mechanical impedance model of piezoelectric actuator-sensors for debonding detection of composite patches, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 13, 389, 10.1177/104538902761696733 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Nasrollahi, 2018, Multimodal structural health monitoring based on active and passive sensing, Struct. Health Monit., 17, 395, 10.1177/1475921717699375 · DOI
  33. Su, 2006, Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review, J. Sound Vib., 295, 753, 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Willberg, 2015, Simulation methods for guided wave- based structural health monitoring: A review, Appl. Mech. Rev., 67, 10803, 10.1115/1.4029539 · DOI
  35. Sohn, 2001, Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals, Smart Mater. Struct., 10, 446, 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/304 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Koh, 2002, Effects of local stiffness changes and delamination on Lamb wave transmission using surface-mounted piezoelectric transducers, Compos. Struct., 57, 437, 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00111-3 · doi:10.1016/s0263-8223(02)00111-3
  37. Kim, 2001, Effectiveness of the continuous wavelet transform in the analysis of some dispersive elastic waves, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110, 86, 10.1121/1.1378348 · DOI
  38. Kessler, 2002, Damage detection in composite materials using Lamb wave methods, Smart Mater. Struct., 11, 269, 10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/310 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Chang, 1995, Identifying delamination in composite beams using built-in piezoelectrics: Part I—experiments and analysis, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 6, 649, 10.1177/1045389X9500600506 · doi:10.1177/1045389x9500600506
  40. Leonard, 2002, Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography, Inverse Probl., 18, 1795, 10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/322 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/322
  41. Giurgiutiu, 2004, Embedded-ultrasonics structural radar for in situ structural health monitoring of thin-wall structures, Struct. Health Monit., 3, 121, 10.1177/1475921704042697 · DOI
  42. Peng, 2009, Modeling of wave propagation in plate structures using three-dimensional spectral element method for damage detection, J. Sound Vib., 320, 942, 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.09.005 · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2008.09.005
  43. Kudela, 2007, Modelling of wave propagation in composite plates using the time domain spectral element method, J. Sound Vib., 302, 728, 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.12.016 · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2006.12.016
  44. Sun, 2014, Modeling and parameter study of PWAS-induced Lamb wave based on spectral finite element, Chin. J. Solid Mech., 35, 21
  45. Velichko, 2009, Post-processing of guided wave array data for high resolution pipe inspection, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 126, 2973, 10.1121/1.3257604 · doi:10.1121/1.3257604
  46. Shen, 2016, Combined analytical FEM approach for efficient simulation of Lamb wave damage detection, Ultrasonics, 69, 116, 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.03.019 · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2016.03.019
  47. Stepinski, 2015, Efficient tool for designing 2D phased arrays in lamb waves imaging of isotropic structures, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 26, 2283, 10.1177/1045389X14545389 · doi:10.1177/1045389x14545389
  48. Engholm, 2011, Direction of arrival estimation of Lamb waves using circular arrays, Struct. Health Monit., 10, 467, 10.1177/1475921710379512 · DOI
  49. Giridhara, 2010, Rapid localization of damage using a circular sensor array and Lamb wave based triangulation, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 24, 2929, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.06.002 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.06.002
  50. Li, 2014, Quantitative damage image construction in plate structures using a circular PZT array and lamb waves, Sens. Actuat. A-Phys., 214, 66, 10.1016/j.sna.2014.04.016 · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2014.04.016
  51. Qiu, 2016, A scanning spatial-wavenumber filter and PZT 2-D cruciform array based on-line damage imaging method of composite structure, Sens. Actuat. A-Phys., 248, 62, 10.1016/j.sna.2016.04.062 · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2016.04.062
  52. Yu, 2008, In situ 2-D piezoelectric wafer active sensors arrays for guided wave damage detection, Ultrasonics, 48, 117, 10.1016/j.ultras.2007.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Lei, 2015, A spatial filter and two linear PZT arrays based composite structure imaging method, Vibroeng. Procedia, 17, 1218
  54. Malinowski, 2009, A phased array-based method for damage detection and localization in thin plates, Struct. Health Monit., 8, 5, 10.1177/1475921708090569 · doi:10.1177/1475921708090569
  55. He, 2016, Lamb wave-based subwavelength damage imaging using the DORT-MUSIC technique in metallic plates, Struct. Health Monit., 15, 65, 10.1177/1475921715623359 · doi:10.1177/1475921715623359
  56. Leleux, 2013, Long range detection of defects in composite plates using Lamb waves generated and detected by ultrasonic phased array probes, J. Nondestruct. Eval., 32, 200, 10.1007/s10921-013-0173-0 · doi:10.1007/s10921-013-0173-0
  57. Purekar, 2010, Damage detection in thin composite laminates using piezoelectric phased sensor arrays and guided Lamb wave interrogation, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 21, 995, 10.1177/1045389X10372003 · DOI
  58. Rajagopalan, 2006, A phase reconstruction algorithm for Lamb wave based structural health monitoring of anisotropic multilayered composite plates, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 119, 872, 10.1121/1.2149775 · doi:10.1121/1.2149775
  59. Yan, F., and Rose, J.L. (2007, January 25). Guided wave phased array beam steering in composite plates. Proceedings of the Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, Portland, OR, USA. · doi:10.1117/12.716109
  60. Yu, 2016, Guided wave phased array beamforming and imaging in composite plates, Ultrasonics, 68, 43, 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.02.001 · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2016.02.001
  61. Wang, 2004, A synthetic time-reversal imaging method for structural health monitoring, Smart Mater. Struct., 13, 415, 10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/020 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Michaels, 2008, Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors, Smart Mater. Struct., 17, 035035, 10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035035 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Michaels, 2007, Guided wave signal processing and image fusion for in situ damage localization in plates, Wave Motion, 44, 482, 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2007.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Hall, 2010, Minimum variance ultrasonic imaging applied to an in situ sparse guided wave array, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr., 57, 2311, 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1692 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2010.1692
  65. Qiu, 2013, A quantitative multidamage monitoring method for large-scale complex composite, Struct. Health Monit., 12, 183, 10.1177/1475921713479643 · DOI
  66. Ng, 2009, A Lamb-wave-based technique for damage detection in composite laminates, Smart Mater. Struct., 18, 074006, 10.1088/0964-1726/18/7/074006 · DOI
  67. Cai, 2011, High spatial resolution imaging for structural health monitoring based on virtual time reversal, Smart Mater. Struct., 20, 055018, 10.1088/0964-1726/20/5/055018 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/20/5/055018
  68. Zhao, 2011, Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography in structural health monitoring, Smart Mater. Struct., 20, 105002, 10.1088/0964-1726/20/10/105002 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Hou, 2004, Automatic multi-mode Lamb wave arrival time extraction for improved tomographic reconstruction, Inverse Prob., 20, 1873, 10.1088/0266-5611/20/6/012 · DOI
  70. Khare, 2007, Defect detection in carbon-fiber composites using lamb-wave tomographic methods, Res. Nondestruct. Eval., 18, 101, 10.1080/09349840601128812 · doi:10.1080/09349840601128812
  71. Chan, 2015, An extended diffraction tomography method for quantifying structural damage using numerical Green’s functions, Ultrasonics, 59, 1, 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.01.001 · DOI
  72. Koduru, 2013, Mode controlled guided wave tomography using annular array transducers for SHM of water loaded plate like structures, Smart Mater. Struct., 22, 125021, 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125021 · DOI
  73. Hay, 2006, A comparison of embedded sensor Lamb wave ultrasonic tomography approaches for material loss detection, Smart Mater. Struct., 15, 946, 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/007 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Wang, 2010, Probabilistic damage identification based on correlation analysis using guided wave signals in aluminum plates, Struct. Health Monit., 9, 133, 10.1177/1475921709352145 · DOI
  75. Wang, 2009, Probability of the presence of damage estimated from an active sensor network in a composite panel of multiple stiffeners, Compos. Sci. Technol., 69, 2054, 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.005 · DOI
  76. Hua, 2015, High-resolution damage detection based on local signal difference coefficient model, Struct. Health Monit., 14, 20, 10.1177/1475921714546060 · doi:10.1177/1475921714546060
  77. Liu, 2016, A novel probability-based diagnostic imaging with weight compensation for damage localization using guided waves, Struct. Health Monit., 15, 162, 10.1177/1475921715627491 · doi:10.1177/1475921715627491
  78. Gao, 2016, Guide waves-based multi-damage identification using a local probability-based diagnostic imaging method, Smart Mater. Struct., 25, 045009, 10.1088/0964-1726/25/4/045009 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/25/4/045009
  79. Lu, 2005, A methodology for structural health monitoring with diffuse ultrasonic waves in the presence of temperature variations, Ultrasonics, 43, 717, 10.1016/j.ultras.2005.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Konstantinidis, 2006, The temperature stability of guided wave structural health monitoring systems, Smart Mater. Struct., 15, 967, 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/010 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Croxford, 2010, Efficient temperature compensation strategies for guided wave structural health monitoring, Ultrasonics, 50, 517, 10.1016/j.ultras.2009.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Clarke, 2009, Evaluation of the damage detection capability of a sparse-array guided-wave SHM system applied to a complex structure under varying thermal conditions, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr., 56, 2666, 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1357 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Wang, 2014, An adaptive filter–based temperature compensation technique for structural health monitoring, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 25, 2187, 10.1177/1045389X13519001 · DOI
  84. Michaels, J.E., Lee, S.J., and Michaels, T.E. (2010, January 18–23). Impact of applied loads on guided wave structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the AIP Conference, San Diego, CA, USA. · doi:10.1063/1.3592110
  85. Gandhi, N., Michaels, J.E., and Lee, S.J. (2010, January 18–23). Acoustoelastic Lamb wave propagation in a homogeneous, isotropic aluminum plate. Proceedings of the AIP Conference, San Diego, CA, USA. · doi:10.1063/1.3591852
  86. Roy, 2015, Load monitoring and compensation strategies for guided-waves based structural health monitoring using piezoelectric transducers, J. Sound Vib., 351, 206, 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.04.019 · DOI
  87. Salmanpou, M., Khodaei, Z.S., and Aliabadi, M.H.F. (2017). Impact damage localisation with piezoelectric sensors under operational and environmental conditions. Sensors, 17. · DOI
  88. Wang, 2009, Baseline-free Imaging Method based on New PZT Sensor Arrangements, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 20, 1663, 10.1177/1045389X09105232 · DOI
  89. Sohn, 2007, Damage detection in composite plates by using an enhanced time reversal method, J. Aerosp. Eng., 20, 141, 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:3(141) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2007)20:3(141
  90. Poddar, 2011, Time reversibility of a Lamb wave for damage detection in a metallic plate, Smart Mater. Struct., 20, 25001, 10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/025001 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/025001
  91. Bijudas, 2013, Time reversed Lamb wave for damage detection in a stiffened aluminum plate, Smart Mater. Struct., 22, 105026, 10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105026 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105026
  92. Lim, 2013, Reference-free damage detection, localization, and quantification in composites, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, 3838, 10.1121/1.4802744 · doi:10.1121/1.4802744
  93. Thiene, 2016, Optimal sensor placement for maximum area coverage (MAC) for damage localization in composite structures, Smart Mater. Struct., 25, 095037, 10.1088/0964-1726/25/9/095037 · DOI
  94. Annamdas, 2010, Application of electromechanical impedance technique for engineering structures: Review and future issues, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 21, 41, 10.1177/1045389X09352816 · DOI · Paper page
  95. Annamdas, 2013, Electromechanical impedance of piezoelectric transducers for monitoring metallic and non-metallic structures: A review of wired, wireless and energy-harvesting methods, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 24, 1021, 10.1177/1045389X13481254 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Na, W., and Baek, J. (2018). A review of the piezoelectric electromechanical impedance based structural health monitoring technique for engineering structures. Sensors, 18. · DOI · Paper page
  97. Soh, C.-K., and Lim, Y. (2016). Fatigue damage diagnosis and prognosis using electromechanical impedance technique. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) in Aerospace Structures, Elsevier. · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100148-6.00015-9
  98. Boukabache, 2012, System-on-Chip integration of a new electromechanical impedance calculation method for aircraft structure health monitoring, Sensors, 12, 13617, 10.3390/s121013617 · doi:10.3390/s121013617
  99. Na, 2018, Low cost technique for detecting adhesive debonding damage of glass epoxy composite plate using an impedance based non-destructive testing method, Compos. Struct., 189, 99, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.053 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.053
  100. Zhuang, 2018, Integrity monitoring of adhesively bonded joints via an electromechanical impedance-based approach, Struct. Health Monit., 17, 1031, 10.1177/1475921717732331 · DOI
  101. Simmers, 2006, Detection of corrosion using piezoelectric impedance-based structural health monitoring, AIAA. J., 44, 2800, 10.2514/1.24273 · doi:10.2514/1.24273
  102. Martowicz, 2016, Application of electromechanical impedance-based SHM for damage detection in bolted pipeline connection, Nondestruct. Test. Eval., 31, 17, 10.1080/10589759.2015.1058376 · doi:10.1080/10589759.2015.1058376
  103. Tseng, 2002, Non-parametric damage detection and characterization using smart piezoceramic material, Smart Mater. Struct., 11, 317, 10.1088/0964-1726/11/3/301 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/11/3/301
  104. Tinoco, H.A., and Marulanda, D. (2014, January 13–15). A new index for damage identification in active beams with electromechanical impedance technique (EMI) approach to SHM. Proceedings of the II International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Design, and Manufacturing Technology, Bogota, Colombia.
  105. Giurgiutiu, V. (2007). Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors: With Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors, Academic Press. · DOI · Paper page
  106. Tawie, 2010, Monitoring the strength development in concrete by EMI sensing technique, Constr. Build. Mater., 24, 1746, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.014 · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.014
  107. Hu, 2014, A study of concrete slab damage detection based on the electromechanical impedance method, Sensors, 14, 19897, 10.3390/s141019897 · DOI
  108. Wandowski, T., Opoka, S., Malinowski, P., and Ostachowicz, W. (2015, January 16–18). The performance of three Electromechanical Impedance damage indicators on structural element with bolted joints. Proceedings of the International Symposiumon NDT in Aerospace, Bremen, Germany.
  109. Raju, V. (1997). Implementing Impedance-Based Health Monitoring. [Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech].
  110. Ai, 2014, An effective electromechanical impedance technique for steel structural health monitoring, Constr. Build. Mater., 73, 97, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.029 · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.029
  111. Tinoco, 2016, Damage detection in plates using the electromechanical impedance technique based on decoupled measurements of piezoelectric transducers, J. Sound Vib., 384, 146, 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.08.011 · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2016.08.011
  112. Inman, 2014, Damage detection based on electromechanical impedance principle and principal components, Topics in Modal Analysis, Volume 7, 307
  113. Baptista, 2011, Time-domain analysis of piezoelectric impedance-based structural health monitoring using multilevel wavelet decomposition, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 25, 1550, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.12.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.12.003
  114. Zahedi, 2017, Time–frequency analysis of electro-mechanical impedance (EMI) signature for physics-based damage detections using piezoelectric wafer active sensor (PWAS), Smart Mater. Struct., 26, 055010, 10.1088/1361-665X/aa64c0 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/aa64c0
  115. Giurgiutiu, 2016, Radiation, temperature, and vacuum effects on piezoelectric wafer active sensors, Smart Mater. Struct., 25, 035024, 10.1088/0964-1726/25/3/035024 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/25/3/035024
  116. Campeiro, 2018, Impedance-based damage detection under noise and vibration effects, Struct. Health Monit., 17, 654, 10.1177/1475921717715240 · doi:10.1177/1475921717715240
  117. Islam, 2014, Understanding the effects of adhesive layer on the electromechanical impedance (EMI) of bonded piezoelectric wafer transducer, Smart Mater. Struct., 23, 125037, 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125037 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125037
  118. Wandowski, 2017, Temperature and damage influence on electromechanical impedance method used for carbon fibre–reinforced polymer panels, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 28, 782, 10.1177/1045389X16657423 · DOI
  119. Sepehry, 2011, Temperature variation effect compensation in impedance-based structural health monitoring using neural networks, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 22, 1975, 10.1177/1045389X11421814 · DOI
  120. Gao, 2018, Integrated impedance and Lamb wave–based structural health monitoring strategy for long-term cycle-loaded composite structure, Struct. Health Monit., 17, 763, 10.1177/1475921717717312 · doi:10.1177/1475921717717312
  121. Hoshyarmanesh, 2018, Structural health monitoring of rotary aerospace structures based on electromechanical impedance of integrated piezoelectric transducers, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 29, 1799, 10.1177/1045389X17754266 · DOI
  122. Na, 2016, Experimental investigation for an isolation technique on conducting the electromechanical impedance method in high-temperature pipeline facilities, J. Sound Vib., 383, 210, 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.07.036 · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2016.07.036
  123. Gaul, 1998, Identification of the impact location on a plate using wavelets, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 12, 783, 10.1006/mssp.1998.0163 · doi:10.1006/mssp.1998.0163
  124. Meo, 2005, Impact identification on a sandwich plate from wave propagation responses, Compos. Struct., 71, 302, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.028 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.028
  125. Zhang, 2014, Impact identification using a passive imaging method, Int. J. Appl. Electrom., 46, 835
  126. Choi, 1996, Identification of impact force and location using distributed sensors, AIAA. J., 34, 136, 10.2514/3.13033 · DOI
  127. Tracy, M.J., and Chang, F.-K. (1996, January 1). Identifying impact load in composite plates based on distributed piezoelectric sensor measurements. Proceedings of the 1996 Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, CA, USA. · doi:10.1117/12.239025
  128. Seydel, 2001, Impact identification of stiffened composite panels: I. System development, Smart Mater. Struct., 10, 354, 10.1088/0964-1726/10/2/323 · DOI · Paper page
  129. Seydel, 2001, Impact identification of stiffened composite panels: II. Implementation studies, Smart Mater. Struct., 10, 370, 10.1088/0964-1726/10/2/324 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/10/2/324
  130. Park, J., and Chang, F.-K. (2005, January 16). System identification method for monitoring impact events. Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA. · doi:10.1117/12.599139
  131. Mueller, I., Das, S., Roy, S., Janapati, V., Vonnieda, K., Zhang, D., and Chang, F.-K. (2010, January 8). An integrated health management system for real-time impact monitoring and prediction of impact-induced damage on composite structures. Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems. Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA. · doi:10.1117/12.849667
  132. Ahmari, 2013, Impact location and load identification through inverse analysis with bounded uncertain measurements, Smart Mater. Struct., 22, 085024, 10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/085024 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/085024
  133. Yang, M., and Ahmari, S. (2014, January 8). Impact event identification through real-time strain measurements. Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA. · doi:10.1117/12.2044697
  134. Worden, 2000, Impact location and quantification on a composite panel using neural networks and a genetic algorithm, Strain, 36, 61, 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2000.tb01175.x · DOI
  135. Staszewski, 2000, Fail-safe sensor distributions for impact detection in composite materials, Smart Mater. Struct., 9, 298, 10.1088/0964-1726/9/3/308 · DOI
  136. Worden, 2004, An overview of intelligent fault detection in systems and structures, Struct. Health Monit., 3, 85, 10.1177/1475921704041866 · DOI · Paper page
  137. LeClerc, 2007, Impact detection in an aircraft composite panel—A neural-network approach, J. Sound Vib., 299, 672, 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.07.019 · DOI
  138. Chen, 2012, Impact source identification in finite isotropic plates using a time-reversal method: Experimental study, Smart Mater. Struct., 21, 105025, 10.1088/0964-1726/21/10/105025 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/21/10/105025
  139. Markmiller, 2010, Sensor network optimization for a passive sensing impact detection technique, Struct. Health Monit., 9, 25, 10.1177/1475921709349673 · DOI
  140. Marzani, 2011, A passive monitoring technique based on dispersion compensation to locate impacts in plate-like structures, Smart Mater. Struct., 20, 035021, 10.1088/0964-1726/20/3/035021 · DOI
  141. Kundu, 2012, Acoustic source localization in anisotropic plates, Ultrasonics, 52, 740, 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.01.017 · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2012.01.017
  142. Sanchez, 2016, A novel impact identification algorithm based on a linear approximation with maximum entropy, Smart Mater. Struct., 25, 095050, 10.1088/0964-1726/25/9/095050 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/25/9/095050
  143. Fu, 2016, Fast detection of impact location using kernel extreme learning machine, Neural Comput. Appl., 27, 121, 10.1007/s00521-014-1568-2 · DOI
  144. Merlo, E.M., Bulletti, A., Giannelli, P., Calzolai, M., and Capineri, L. (2017). A novel differential time-of-arrival estimation technique for impact localization on carbon fiber laminate sheets. Sensors, 17. · doi:10.3390/s17102270
  145. Zhu, 2018, A two-step impact localization method for composite structures with a parameterized laminate model, Compos. Struct., 192, 500, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.052 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.052
  146. Khodaei, 2012, Determination of impact location on composite stiffened panels, Smart Mater. Struct., 21, 105026, 10.1088/0964-1726/21/10/105026 · DOI
  147. Hodge, 2015, Wireless sensor networks for condition monitoring in the railway industry: A survey, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 16, 1088, 10.1109/TITS.2014.2366512 · DOI · Paper page
  148. Cheong, 2011, A ZigBee-based wireless sensor network node for ultraviolet detection of flame, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 58, 5271, 10.1109/TIE.2011.2119455 · doi:10.1109/tie.2011.2119455
  149. Bouzid, 2015, Structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades: Acoustic source localization using wireless sensor networks, J. Sens., 2015, 139695, 10.1155/2015/139695 · DOI
  150. 152 Liu, P., Yuan, S., and Qiu, L. (2012). Development of a PZT-based wireless digital monitor for composite impact monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct., 21, 035018. · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/21/3/035018
  151. Yuan, 2013, A multi-radio sink node designed for wireless SHM applications, Smart. Struct. Syst., 11, 261, 10.12989/sss.2013.11.3.261 · doi:10.12989/sss.2013.11.3.261
  152. Yuan, 2016, A multi-response-based wireless impact monitoring network for aircraft composite structures, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 63, 7712, 10.1109/TIE.2016.2598529 · DOI
  153. Fu, H., Khodaei, Z.S., and Aliabadi, M.H.F. (2018). An event-triggered energy-efficient wirelessstructural health monitoring system for impact detection in composite airframes. IEEE Internet Things J. · DOI
  154. Fan, 2018, Design and manufacture technology of expandable multifunctional composite structure state sensing network, J. Exp. Mech., 33, 85
  155. Salowitz, 2014, Microfabricated expandable sensor networks for intelligent sensing materials, IEEE. Sens. J., 14, 2138, 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2297699 · DOI
  156. Kusaka, T., and Qing, P. (2003, January 15–17). Characterization of loading effects on the performance of SMART layer embedded or surface-mounted on structures. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  157. Sun, H., Wang, Y., Qing, X., and Wu, Z. (2018). High Strain Survivability of Piezoceramics by Optimal Bonding Adhesive Design. Sensors, 18. · doi:10.3390/s18082554
  158. Qing, X.P., Kumar, A., Beard, S., Yu, P., Zhang, D., Liu, C., and Hannum, R. (2006, January 5–7). Advanced Self-sufficient Structural Health Monitoring System. Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Granada, Spain.
  159. Lin, 2002, The manufacture of composite structures with a built-in network of piezoceramics, Compos. Sci. Technol., 62, 919, 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00007-6 · DOI · Paper page
  160. Beard, S., Liu, C.-C., and Chang, F.-K. (2007, January 11). Design of a robust SHM system for composite structures. Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA. · doi:10.1117/12.717319
  161. Qing, 2009, Development of a real-time active pipeline integrity detection system, Smart Mater. Struct., 18, 115010, 10.1088/0964-1726/18/11/115010 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/18/11/115010
  162. Su, 2004, Lamb wave-based quantitative identification of delamination in CF/EP composite structures using artificial neural algorithm, Compos. Struct., 66, 627, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.011 · DOI · Paper page
  163. Dworakowski, 2015, Application of artificial neural networks for compounding multiple damage indices in Lamb-wave-based damage detection, Struct. Control Health Monit., 22, 50, 10.1002/stc.1659 · doi:10.1002/stc.1659
  164. Sbarufatti, 2014, A numerically-enhanced machine learning approach to damage diagnosis using a Lamb wave sensing network, J. Sound Vib., 333, 4499, 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.04.059 · DOI
  165. Sushant, 2014, Lamb wave based automatic damage detection using matching pursuit and machine learning, Smart Mater. Struct., 23, 085012, 10.1088/0964-1726/23/8/085012 · DOI
  166. Liu, 2013, Low-velocity impact damage monitoring of a sandwich composite wing, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 24, 2074, 10.1177/1045389X12453964 · doi:10.1177/1045389x12453964
  167. Flynn, 2011, Maximum-likelihood estimation of damage location in guided-wave structural health monitoring, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 467, 2575
  168. Ng, 2014, On the selection of advanced signal processing techniques for guided wave damage identification using a statistical approach, Eng. Struct., 67, 50, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.019 · DOI
  169. Gang, 2013, A Bayesian approach for damage localization in plate-like structures using Lamb waves, Smart Mater. Struct., 22, 035012, 10.1088/0964-1726/22/3/035012 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/22/3/035012
  170. Chronopoulos, 2019, A robust Bayesian methodology for damage localization in plate-like structures using ultrasonic guided-waves, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 122, 192, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.021 · DOI
  171. Chakraborty, 2015, An adaptive learning damage estimation method for structural health monitoring, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 26, 125, 10.1177/1045389X14522531 · doi:10.1177/1045389x14522531
  172. Lei, 2014, On-line updating Gaussian mixture model for aircraft wing spar damage evaluation under time-varying boundary condition, Smart Mater. Struct., 23, 125001, 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125001 · DOI
  173. Lei, 2016, Crack propagation monitoring in a full-scale aircraft fatigue test based on guided wave-Gaussian mixture model, Smart Mater. Struct., 25, 055048, 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/055048 · DOI
  174. Ren, Y., Qiu, L., Yuan, S., and Fang, F. (2018). Gaussian mixture model–based path-synthesis accumulation imaging of guided wave for damage monitoring of aircraft composite structures under temperature variation. Struct. Health Monit. · DOI
  175. Yan, 2014, A particle filter method for damage location in plate-like structures by using Lamb waves, Struct. Control Health Monit., 21, 847, 10.1002/stc.1605 · doi:10.1002/stc.1605
  176. Chen, 2018, On-line prognosis of fatigue crack propagation based on Gaussian weight-mixture proposal particle filter, Ultrasonics, 82, 134, 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.07.016 · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2017.07.016
  177. Spencer, 2004, Smart sensing technology: Opportunities and challenges, Struct. Control Health Monit., 11, 349, 10.1002/stc.48 · DOI · Paper page
  178. Wang, 2016, Progress on Study of Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Joints, Acta Mater. Compos. Sin., 33, 1
  179. 2015, Fibre optic sensors for structural health monitoring of aircraft composite structures: Recent advances and applications, Sensors, 15, 18666, 10.3390/s150818666 · DOI · Paper page
  180. McEvoy, 2015, Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication, Science, 347, 1261689, 10.1126/science.1261689 · DOI · Paper page
  181. Baughman, 1999, Carbon nanotube actuators, Science, 284, 1340, 10.1126/science.284.5418.1340 · DOI · Paper page
  182. Zagrai, 2010, Piezoelectric wafer active sensor structural health monitoring of space structures, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 21, 921, 10.1177/1045389X10369850 · DOI
  183. Zhou, 2012, Evaluation of fatigue cracks using nonlinearities of acousto-ultrasonic waves acquired by an active sensor network, Smart Mater. Struct., 22, 015018, 10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/015018 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/015018
  184. Hong, 2015, Locating fatigue damage using temporal signal features of nonlinear Lamb waves, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 60, 182, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.01.020 · DOI
  185. Ni, 2012, Highly nonlinear solitary waves for the inspection of adhesive joints, Exp. Mech., 52, 1493, 10.1007/s11340-012-9595-3 · doi:10.1007/s11340-012-9595-3
  186. Khodaei, Z.S., and Aliabadi, M.H. (2016). A mult-level decision fusion strategy for condition based maintenance of composite structures. Materials, 9. · DOI

Cited by

See all 446

Metadata

Authors
Qing, X., Li, W., Wang, Y., & Sun, H.
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-01-28
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
545
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/s19030545
OpenAlex
W2914316664
Cited by
446
References
0
FWCI
31.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Piezoelectric Transducer-Based Structural Health Monitoring for Aircraft Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s19030545
The paper
Qing, X., Li, W., Wang, Y., & Sun, H. (2019). Piezoelectric Transducer-Based Structural Health Monitoring for Aircraft Applications. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030545

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.