Cited by 691Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Bubbles of Trust: A decentralized blockchain-based authentication system for IoT

Hammi, Mohamed Tahar, Hammi, Badis, Bellot, Patrick, Serhrouchni, Ahmed·2018·Computers & Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2018.06.004

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammi, M. T., Hammi, B., Bellot, P., & Serhrouchni, A.
Affiliations
ParisTech (FR)
Corresponding author
Hammi, Badis
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
78
Pages
126-142
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810652557
Cited by
691
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 9
FWCI
121.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
Internet of Things security, decentralized authentication, blockchain, device authentication, data integrity, Ethereum, IoT device identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review