CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 108Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementPublic Policy and Administration Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sustainable Public Procurement: The Impact of Ability, Motivation, and Opportunity on the Implementation of Different Types of Sustainable Public Procurement

Open access
Grandia, Jolien, Voncken, Dylan·2019·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su11195215
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Public organisations develop sustainable public procurement (SPP) policies to compel suppliers to contribute to societal goals. Studies show that the ability, motivation, and opportunity that procurers have to procure in a sustainable manner affect the uptake of SPP. Most studies into SPP examine these factors only in the context of one type of SPP (e.g., green procurement). The goal of this paper is therefore to examine the relationship between ability, motivation, and opportunity and six types of SPP: (1) green public procurement, (2) social return on investment, (3) circular economy, (4) bio-based public procurement, (5) innovation-oriented public procurement and (6) international social criteria. An online survey was administered amongst procurers working in Dutch public organisations. The research shows that ability, motivation, and opportunity affect Green Public Procurement (GPP). Opportunity did affect green public procurement, innovation-oriented public procurement and circular economy, but not the other types of SPP. We were unable to identify an antecedent of more social types of SPP in this research. This research shows that findings based on GPP cannot be directly generalized to other types of SPP, and that there is a need for research into the antecedents of social types of SPP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su11195215

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Moore, M.H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Harvard University Press.
  2. Flynn, A., Davis, P., McKevitt, D., and McEvoy, E. (2013). Sustainable Public Procurement in Practice: Case Study Evidence from Ireland, PrAcademic Press.
  3. Decarolis, F., and Frey, M. (2014). Sustainable Procurement in Practice: Explaining the Degree of Sustainable Procurement from an Organizational Perspective. Public Procurement’s Place in the World: The Charge Towards Sustainability and Innovation, Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Boxall, P., and Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and Human Resource Management, Palgrave Macmillan. [3rd ed.].
  5. Chin, 1998, Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, MIS Q., 22, vii
  6. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford Press. [4th ed.].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Grandia, J., & Voncken, D.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Ministry of Finance (NL)
Corresponding author
Grandia, Jolien
ORCID
Grandia, Jolien
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-09-24
Volume
11
Issue
19
Pages
5215
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/su11195215
OpenAlex
W2976890453
Cited by
107
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
sustainable public procurement, green public procurement, social return on investment, circular economy, public sector organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review