Circular public procurement practices in Danish municipalities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are a few studies on the potential of CPP for furniture.
“There are a few studies on the potential of CPP for furniture (Alhola et al., 2019;Öhgren et al., 2019;Kristensen et al., 2021)”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Kristensen et al., 2021
Studies of CPP often focus on the drivers of, and barriers to, the implementation of this policy tool.
“Studies of CPP often focus on the drivers of, and barriers to, the implementation of this policy tool (Alhola et al., 2019;Kristensen et al., 2021;Lingegård et al., 2021a).”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Kristensen et al., 2021
Increased collaboration is vital for CPP.
“Furthermore, increased collaboration is vital (Kristensen et al., 2021) and strategies for effectively engaging with suppliers are becoming more important, moving away from compliance-related approaches (Meehan and Bryde, 2011).”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Kristensen et al., 2021
CPP requires more than procurement using green criteria (GPP) and sustainable criteria (SPP).
“However, CPP requires more than procurement using green criteria (GPP) and sustainable criteria (SPP).”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Kristensen et al., 2021
Kristensen et al. (2021) identify three other requirements for CPP: earlier market engagement and other technical specifications and criteria; increased collaboration internally and externally due to life cycle perspective; and a shift toward producing more services through PSS, which requires collaboration with new stakeholders and a change in normal practices.
“Kristensen et al. (2021) identify three other requirements: (1) Earlier market engagement and other technical specifications and criteria, (2) Increased collaboration internally and externally due to life cycle perspective, (3) A shift toward producing more services through PSS, which requires collaboration with new stakeholders and a change in normal practices.”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Kristensen et al., 2021
The undecided determining factors point to increased internal collaboration due to the life cycle perspective on the CPP.
“which points to increased internal collaboration due to the life cycle perspective on the CPP (see, e.g., Kristensen et al., 2021).”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Kristensen et al., 2021
Cites
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550 · see citing works
Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study
Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111119551 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Exploiting the potential of public procurement: opportunities for circular economy
Alhola, K., Ryding, S. O., Salmenperä, H., & Busch, N. J. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12770 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Grandia, J., & Voncken, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11195215 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Öhgren, M., Milios, L., Dalhammar, C., & Lindahl, M. (2019) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.134 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on barriers and enablers toward circular procurement management
Qazi, A. A., & Appolloni, A. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.013 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture
Lingegård, S., & von Oelreich, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2023.1136725 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Previous research calls for indepth studies on procurement practices using observations and interviews to better understand procuring organizations’ readiness for CPP (Kristensen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Kristensen, H. S., Mosgaard, M. A., & Remmen, A.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Kristensen, Heidi Simone
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 281
- Pages
- 124962
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3096700899
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17
- FWCI
- 14.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Innovationsfonden
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
- Keywords
- circular public procurement, green public procurement, circular economy, municipal procurement, Danish municipalities, eco-labels, procurement practices, supply chain collaboration, organizational learning, environmental policy implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review