Cited by 23Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHuman Resource and Talent ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Sustainable HRM as a driver for innovative work behaviour: Do respect, openness, and continuity matter? The case of Lithuania

Open access
Stankevičiūtė, Živilė, Staniškienė, Eglė, Ciganė, Urtė·2020·Sustainability

Abstract

There is a widespread consensus in prior literature that innovative work behaviour is a crucial factor in enabling organisations to adapt to rapid changes, to gain a competitive advantage, and create a sustainable organisation. Despite its importance, knowledge about potential drivers of this behaviour is fragmented and inconsistent. As such, organisations may be restricted in their ability to innovate because they do not know how to induce the employees in a way that will encourage them to explore, generate, champion, and finally implement the ideas. Recently, human resource management (HRM) has been explored among potential drivers, considering it as primary means by which organisations can influence and shape the behaviours of employees. Despite the notion that HRM predicts innovative work behaviour, there is a lack in the literature of insights into the ways the organisations can stimulate behaviour by offering sustainability-focused HRM. Sustainable HRM refers to a new approach to people management with the focus on external business environment (openness), respect for the employee (respect), and balanced interests of employer and employee (continuity). Relying on the notion that organisations are gradually introducing sustainable HRM and trying to close the gap in the literature, the paper is designed to link a new approach to people management with innovative work behaviour. The aim of the paper is an initial assessment of whether sustainable HRM is a driver for innovative work behaviour. Disentangling four dimensions of innovative work behaviour makes it possible to determine whether sustainable HRM can stimulate different behaviour types linked to idea exploration, idea generation, idea championing, and idea implementation. The results of a preparatory survey of 306 employees working in Lithuanian companies showed that respect-oriented HRM and continuity-oriented HRM were positively related to innovative work behaviour and the appropriate dimensions (except for idea exploration in case of continuity-oriented HRM); meanwhile, there was no support for the relationship between openness-oriented HRM and innovative work behaviour. Overall, sustainable HRM was found to be a driver for enhancing innovative work behaviour and its dimensions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12145511

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The essence of ethical HRM, increasingly viewed as a subcategory of sustainable HRM, is closely related to at least the social sustainability dimension of the sustainable HRM argument, but most studies under this umbrella are empirical rather than philosophical.

    “That said, the essence of ethical HRM, which is increasingly viewed as a subcategory of sustainable HRM (Stankeviciute et al., 2020), is closely related to at least the social sustainability dimension of the sustainable HRM argument, but, again, most of the studies under this umbrella are empirical, rather than philosophical.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stankevičiūtė, Ž., Staniškienė, E., & Ciganė, U.
Affiliations
Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
Corresponding author
Stankevičiūtė, Živilė
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-07-08
Volume
12
Issue
14
Pages
5511
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3041300989
Cited by
23
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTUePubl (Repository of Kaunas University of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Research Council of Lithuania (09.3.3.-LMT-K-712-15-0018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
sustainable human resource management, innovative behavior, idea exploration, idea generation, idea implementation, employee behavior, Lithuanian companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review