Cited by 82Sustainable Development and Environmental PolicyHuman Rights and DevelopmentQuality of Life Measurement

Synergies and Trade-Offs in Reaching the Sustainable Development Goals

Open access
Hegre, Håvard, Petrova, Kristina, von Uexkull, Nina·2020·Sustainability

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted in 2015 integrate diverse issues such as addressing hunger, gender equality and clean energy and set a common agenda for all United Nations member states until 2030. The 17 SDGs interact and by working towards achieving one goal countries may further—or jeopardise—progress on others. However, the direction and strength of these interactions are still poorly understood and it remains an analytical challenge to capture the relationships between the multi-dimensional goals, comprising 169 targets and over 200 indicators. Here, we use principal component analysis (PCA), an in this context novel approach, to summarise each goal and interactions in the global SDG agenda. Applying PCA allows us to map trends, synergies and trade-offs at the level of goals for all SDGs while using all available information on indicators. While our approach does not allow us to investigate causal relationships, it provides important evidence of the degree of compatibility of goal attainment over time. Based on global data 2000–2016, our results indicate that synergies between and within the SDGs prevail, both in terms of levels and over time change. An exception is SDG 10 ‘Reducing inequalities’ which has not progressed in tandem with other goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12208729

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vulnerability levels have generally declined in recent decades.

    “Despite the highly uneven distribution of resilience across the world, vulnerability levels have generally declined in recent decades, aided by notable progress toward common development goals (73,74)”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [74]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hegre, H., Petrova, K., & von Uexkull, N.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Box 514, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden
Corresponding author
Hegre, Håvard
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-21
Volume
12
Issue
20
Pages
8729
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093674003
Cited by
82
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Reseach Council of Norway (268135)
  • European Research Council (694640)
  • MISTRA Geopolitics (-)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals, SDG interactions, synergistic effect, trade-offs, principal component analysis, SDG indicators, goal compatibility, inequality reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review