Cited by 182Healthcare Systems and ChallengesCultural Competency in Health CareEthics in Clinical Research

Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in research--call for action

Open access
Redwood, Sabi, Gill, Paramjit S·2013·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

People have been coming to the UK since the beginning of recorded time.1 The latest Census shows that England and Wales have become more ethnically diverse with the majority of individuals still identifying themselves as white British (80.6%).2 Over the past two decades, as a result of economic and political changes, migration patterns into the UK have shifted from postcolonial migration particularly referring to relatively discreet communities from the Indian sub-continent and West Indies settling in the UK, to a new type of migration with many different people arriving from many different places. This shift in pattern has resulted in a new kind of diversity which Vertovec3 has coined ‘super-diversity’ characterised by overlapping variables including country of origin (ethnicity, language, religious tradition, regional and/or local identities), migration experience (influenced by sex, age, education, specific social networks, economic factors), and legal status (encompassing a variety of entitlements and restrictions). Thus ethnic and cultural diversity is becoming more complex. While diversity has many benefits for the economy, science, and culture, it also presents health services and research with the challenges of meeting the needs of a population that is super-diverse in terms of their health profiles and behaviour…

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp13x668456

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reasons for perceived exclusion of minority ethnic groups are complex and previous medical research has reported that it is unclear whether the real issue is one of planned exclusion, inadvertent exclusion, an explicit decision regarding non-participation or a mixture of these [38], all of which would result in under-representation.

    “Reasons for perceived exclusion of minority ethnic groups are complex and previous medical research has reported that it is unclear whether the real issue is one of planned exclusion, inadvertent exclusion (e.g., through lack of study materials in minority languages), an explicit decision regarding non-participation or a mixture of these [38], all of which would result in under-representation.”

    From Parental attitudes to randomised controlled trials in primary dental care: A qualitative study (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Department of Health. Governance arrangements for research ethics committees: a harmonised edition. London: DoH, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Redwood, S., & Gill, P. S.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2013-07
Volume
63
Issue
612
Pages
342-343
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2075732190
Cited by
182
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
underrepresentation in research, ethnic minorities, superdiversity, ethnic diversity, migration patterns, health research participation, health disparities
MeSH terms
Ethnicity, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Policy Making, Public Health, Research, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review