The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reproducible extracellular vesicle size and concentration determination with tunable resistive pulse sensing
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: The size of extracellular vesicles (EVs) can be determined with a tunable resistive pulse sensor (TRPS). Because the sensing pore diameter varies from pore to pore, the minimum detectable diameter also varies. The aim of this study is to determine and improve the reproducibility of TRPS measurements. Methods: Experiments were performed with the qNano system (Izon) using beads and a standard urine vesicle sample. With a combination of voltage and stretch that yields a high blockade height, we investigate whether the minimum detected diameter is more reproducible when we configure the instrument targeting (a) fixed stretch and voltage, or (b) fixed blockade height. Results: Daily measurements with a fixed stretch and voltage (n=102) on a standard urine sample show a minimum detected vesicle diameter of 128±19 nm [mean±standard deviation; coefficient of variation (CV) 14.8%]. The vesicle concentration was 2.4·10 9±3.8·10 9 vesicles/mL (range 1.4·10 8–1.8·10 10). When we compared setting a fixed stretch and voltage to setting a fixed blockade height on 3 different pores, we found a minimum detected vesicle diameter of 118 nm (CV 15.5%, stretch), and 123 nm (CV 4.5%, blockade height). The detected vesicle concentration was 3.2–8.2·10 8 vesicles/mL with fixed stretch and 6.4–7.8·10 8 vesicles/mL with fixed blockade height. Summary/conclusion: Pore‐to‐pore variability is the cause of the variation in minimum detected size when setting a fixed stretch and voltage. The reproducibility of the minimum detectable diameter is much improved by setting a fixed blockade height.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Welsh, J. A., Goberdhan, D. C. I., O'Driscoll, L., Buzas, E. I., Blenkiron, C., Bussolati, B., Cai, H., Di Vizio, D., Driedonks, T. A. P., Erdbrügger, U., et al. (2024) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12404 · Cited by 4,663
Self-citationApplying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials – an ISEV position paper
Lener, T., Gimona, M., Aigner, L., Börger, V., Buzas, E., Camussi, G., Chaput, N., Chatterjee, D., Court, F. A., del Portillo, H. A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v4.30087 · Cited by 1,491
Exosomes as a new frontier of cancer liquid biopsy
Yu, D., Li, Y., Wang, M., Gu, J., Xu, W., Cai, H., Fang, X., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-022-01509-9 · Cited by 855
Erdbrügger, U., Blijdorp, C. J., Bijnsdorp, I. V., Borràs, F. E., Burger, D., Bussolati, B., Byrd, J. B., Clayton, A., Dear, J. W., Falcón‐Pérez, J. M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12093 · Cited by 404
Extracellular vesicles: A bright star of nanomedicine
Wu, P., Zhang, B., Ocansey, D. K. W., Xu, W., & Qian, H. (2021) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120467 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Coumans, F. A. W., van der Pol, E., Böing, A. N., Hajji, N., Sturk, G., van Leeuwen, T. G., & Nieuwland, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25922-25922
- ISSN
- 2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122519854
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducible extracellular vesicle size and concentration determination with tunable resistive pulse sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/jev.v3.25922
- The paper
- Coumans, F. A. W., van der Pol, E., Böing, A. N., Hajji, N., Sturk, G., van Leeuwen, T. G., & Nieuwland, R. (2014). Reproducible extracellular vesicle size and concentration determination with tunable resistive pulse sensing. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.25922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.