Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel multiplex bead‐based platform highlights the diversity of extracellular vesicles

Open access
Koliha, Nina, Wiencek, Yvonne, Heider, Ute, Jüngst, Christian, Kladt, Nikolay, Krauthäuser, Susanne, Johnston, Ian C. D., Bosio, Andreas, Schauss, Astrid, Wild, Stefan·2016·Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract

The surface protein composition of extracellular vesicles (EVs) is related to the originating cell and may play a role in vesicle function. Knowledge of the protein content of individual EVs is still limited because of the technical challenges to analyse small vesicles. Here, we introduce a novel multiplex bead‐based platform to investigate up to 39 different surface markers in one sample. The combination of capture antibody beads with fluorescently labelled detection antibodies allows the analysis of EVs that carry surface markers recognized by both antibodies. This new method enables an easy screening of surface markers on populations of EVs. By combining different capture and detection antibodies, additional information on relative expression levels and potential vesicle subpopulations is gained. We also established a protocol to visualize individual EVs by stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. Thereby, markers on single EVs can be detected by fluorophore‐conjugated antibodies. We used the multiplex platform and STED microscopy to show for the first time that NK cell–derived EVs and platelet‐derived EVs are devoid of CD9 or CD81, respectively, and that EVs isolated from activated B cells comprise different EV subpopulations. We speculate that, according to our STED data, tetraspanins might not be homogenously distributed but may mostly appear as clusters on EV subpopulations. Finally, we demonstrate that EV mixtures can be separated by magnetic beads and analysed subsequently with the multiplex platform. Both the multiplex bead‐based platform and STED microscopy revealed subpopulations of EVs that have been indistinguishable by most analysis tools used so far. We expect that an in‐depth view on EV heterogeneity will contribute to our understanding of different EVs and functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/jev.v5.29975

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 307

Metadata

Authors
Koliha, N., Wiencek, Y., Heider, U., Jüngst, C., Kladt, N., Krauthäuser, S., Johnston, I. C. D., Bosio, A., Schauss, A., & Wild, S.
Venue
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
29975-29975
ISSN
2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2274860869
Cited by
307
References
9
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel multiplex bead‐based platform highlights the diversity of extracellular vesicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/jev.v5.29975
The paper
Koliha, N., Wiencek, Y., Heider, U., Jüngst, C., Kladt, N., Krauthäuser, S., Johnston, I. C. D., Bosio, A., Schauss, A., & Wild, S. (2016). A novel multiplex bead‐based platform highlights the diversity of extracellular vesicles. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v5.29975

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.