Cited by 34Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsSocial Policies and Family

Low fertility and fertility policies in the Asia-Pacific region

Open access
Boydell, Victoria, Mori, Rintaro, Shahrook, Sadequa, Gietel-Basten, Stuart·2023·Global Health & Medicine

Abstract

Declining fertility is an increasing global trend. In many low fertility contexts, people are having fewer children then they want, and these unfulfilled fertility desires have been associated with wider socio-economic changes in education and labour force participation and conflicting and often contradictory expectations of women at home and at work. The right to determine if, when and how one has children is enshrined in international law yet many policies responses to low fertility fail to meet these standards. This paper summarizes why people in the Asia-Pacific region are having fewer children than they desire, and the range of policy responses, particularly those that make life easier for working parents. This raises two important points. First, we need to contend to the gender dynamics that underpin this in the region, despite gradual changes in women's roles, they are still seen as "caregivers" and undertake a disproportionate amount of unpaid care work, often having to lean-out of their employment, and/or face gender discrimination in the workplace. Second, the "emergency" of low fertility arises from complex social and economic conditions that cannot be solved by population policies solely focused on making babies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35772/ghm.2023.01058

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of parental leave on fertility may be dampened by broader institutions and social norms such as long working hours and limited workplace support.

    “there are also suggestions that this effect may be dampened by broader institutions and social norms such as long working hours and limited workplace support (Boydell et al. 2023; Rindfuss and Choe 2016).”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Boydell et al. 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Wilkins E. Low fertility: A review of the determinants. Working Paper No. 2. 2019. https://www.unfpa.org/ publications/low-fertility-review-determinants (accessed September 28, 2023).
  2. Longman P. Think again: Global aging. Foreign Policy.2010; 182:52-58.
  3. United Nations. Report of the international conference on population and development. https://www.un.org/ development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa. pd/files/a_conf.171_13_rev.1.pdf (accessed September 28, 2023).
  4. Irene B. Taeuber. The population of Japan. Science. 1959; 129:1131.
  5. Brinton MC. Sharing burdens a remedy for falling birthrates. East Asia Forum Quarterly. 2019; 11:3-5. https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n5214/pdf/ book.pdf (accessed September 28, 2023)
  6. Ji YC, Wang HG, Liu Y, Xu RN, Zheng ZZ. Young women's fertility intentions and the emerging bilateral family system under China's two-child family planning policy. China Review. 2020; 20:113-142.
  7. Fukuda S, Matsukura R. Intergenerational transfer of care work: How technology would meet with future care demand in Japan and the UK? The 2022 WFRN (Work-Family Researchers Network) Conference, 2022. https://researchmap.jp/fukuda-setsuya/ presentations/38891957?lang=en (accessed September 28, 2023).
  8. England P, Privaalko I, Levine A. Has the Gender Revolution Stalled? Econ Soc Rev (Irel). 2020; 51:463- 488.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boydell, V., Mori, R., Shahrook, S., & Gietel-Basten, S.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Hamilton Health Sciences (CA)
  • Stuart Gietel-Basten, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Venue
Global Health & Medicine
Published
2023-10-31
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
271-277
ISSN
  • 2434-9186 (ISSN-L)
  • 2434-9194
OpenAlex
W4387789622
Cited by
33
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
Keywords
low fertility, fertility decline, fertility policy, Asia-Pacific region, gender dynamics, unpaid care work, women's labour force participation, right to family planning, gender discrimination in employment, working parents, population policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review