The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Scope, and Impact of Spinal Pain
Abstract
Persistent pain interfering with daily activities is common. Chronic pain has been defined in many ways. Chronic pain syndrome is a separate entity from chronic pain. Chronic pain is defined as, “pain that persists 6 months after an injury and beyond the usual course of an acute disease or a reasonable time for a comparable injury to heal, that is associated with chronic pathologic processes that cause continuous or intermittent pain for months or years, that may continue in the presence or absence of demonstrable pathologies; may not be amenable to routine pain control methods; and healing may never occur.” In contrast, chronic pain syndrome has been defined as a complex condition with physical, psychological, emotional, and social components. The prevalence of chronic pain in the adult population ranges from 2% to 40%, with a median point prevalence of 15%. Among chronic pain disorders, pain arising from various structures of the spine constitutes the majority of the problems. The lifetime prevalence of spinal pain has been reported as 54% to 80%. Studies of the prevalence of low back pain and neck pain and its impact in general have shown 23% of patients reporting Grade II to IV low back pain (high pain intensity with disability) versus 15% with neck pain. Further, age related prevalence of persistent pain appears to be much more common in the elderly associated with functional limitations and difficulty in performing daily life activities. Chronic persistent low back and neck pain is seen in 25% to 60% of patients, one-year or longer after the initial episode. Spinal pain is associated with significant economic, societal, and health impact. Estimates and patterns of productivity losses and direct health care expenditures among individuals with back and neck pain in the United States continue to escalate. Recent studies have shown significant increases in the prevalence of various pain problems including low back pain. Frequent use of opioids in managing chronic non-cancer pain has been a major issue for health care in the United States placing a significant strain on the economy with the majority of patients receiving opioids for chronic pain necessitating an increased production of opioids, and escalating costs of opioid use, even with normal intake. The additional costs of misuse, abuse, and addiction are enormous. Comorbidities including psychological and physical conditions and numerous other risk factors are common in spinal pain and add significant complexities to the interventionalist’s clinical task. This section of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP)/EvidenceBased Medicine (EBM) guidelines evaluates the epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain and its relevance to health care interventions. Key words: Chronic pain, chronic spinal pain, chronic low back pain, chronic neck pain, chronic thoracic pain, prevalence, health care utilization, loss of productivity, interventional techniques, surgery, comorbid factors, socioeconomic effects, health care impact
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain
Airaksinen, O., Brox, J. I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., Mannion, A. F., Reis, S., Staal, J. B., Ursin, H., et al. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1 · Cited by 2,594
Dagenais, S., Caro, J., & Haldeman, S. (2008) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005 · Cited by 2,046
Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems
Martin, B. I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.6.656 · Cited by 1,531
The Rising Prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain
Freburger, J. K., Holmes, G. M., Agans, R. P., Jackman, A. M., Darter, J. D., Wallace, A. S., Castel, L. D., Kalsbeek, W. D., & Carey, T. S. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543 · Cited by 1,507
Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study
Picavet, H. S. J., & Schouten, J. S. A. G. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x · Cited by 1,197
Demyttenaere, K., Bruffaerts, R., Lee, S., Posada-Villa, J., Kovess, V., Angermeyer, M. C., Levinson, D., de Girolamo, G., Nakane, H., Mneimneh, Z., et al. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.022 · Cited by 608
The severity of chronic pediatric pain: an epidemiological study
Huguet, A., & Miró, J. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.015 · Cited by 600
Graded chronic pain status—An epidemiologic evaluation
Von Korff, M., Dworkin, S. F., & Le Resche, L. (1990) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(90)91125-3 · Cited by 488
Epidural Steroids in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review
Abdi, S. (2007) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2007/10/185 · Cited by 479
Compton, W. M., Conway, K. P., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.12.2141 · Cited by 445
Cited by
The Economic Costs of Pain in the United States
Gaskin, D. J., & Richard, P. (2012) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.03.009 · Cited by 2,359
Opioid Epidemic in the United States
Manchikanti, L. (2012) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2012/15/es9 · Cited by 1,180
Self-citationStructural and functional brain abnormalities in chronic low back pain: a systematic review
Kregel, J., Meeus, M., Malfliet, A., Dolphens, M., Danneels, L., Nijs, J., & Cagnie, B. (2015) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.002 · Cited by 315
(2010) · PubMed Central · Cited by 267
Nijs, J., Meeus, M., Cagnie, B., Roussel, N. A., Dolphens, M., Van Oosterwijck, J., & Danneels, L. (2014) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20130258 · Cited by 190
Chronic Neck Pain and Exercise Interventions: Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type Principle
O'Riordan, C., Clifford, A., Van De Ven, P., & Nelson, J. (2014) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.015 · Cited by 153
Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Italian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory
Chiarotto, A., Viti, C., Sulli, A., Cutolo, M., Testa, M., & Piscitelli, D. (2018) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2018.06.005 · Cited by 90
Jakobsen, M. D., Sundstrup, E., Brandt, M., & Andersen, L. L. (2018) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2018.01.006 · Cited by 47
Liebers, F., Brendler, C., & Latza, U. (2013) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-012-1619-8 · Cited by 38
Kapadi, R., Elander, J., & Bateman, A. H. (2024) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2024.2320373 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Manchikanti, L.
- Venue
- Pain Physician
- Published
- 2009-07-14
- Volume
- 4;12
- Issue
- 4;7
- Pages
- E35-E70
- ISSN
- 1533-3159 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-1149
- OpenAlex
- W85787240
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 37.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.