Cited by 20Memory Processes and InfluencesEducational methodologies and cognitive developmentVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Innovations With Schema Theory: Modern Implications For Learning, Memory, And Academic Achievement

Open access
-, Rusen Meylani·2024·International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

Abstract

Schema theory, a cognitive framework, has significantly influenced our understanding of learning, memory, and academic achievement. Originating from a foundation that underscores cognitive structures and processes, schema theory elaborates on how individuals organize, interpret, and store information. This research paper delves into schema theory's core components and processes: schema construction, activation, assimilation, and accommodation. Furthermore, the paper examines the pivotal role of schemas in guiding attention, facilitating comprehension, and influencing memory processes. With academic achievement in focus, the findings suggest that schema activation aids comprehension, knowledge integration, critical thinking, and problem-solving, affecting academic performance. Schema theory also offers insights into memory, revealing encoding strategies that align with existing schemas, biases that might occur during retrieval, and the influence of schemas on memory consolidation. Despite its profound contributions, schema theory still needs critiques, with challenges such as oversimplification and contextual influences highlighted. However, its practical implications are vast, encompassing areas from education and curriculum development to advertising and cross-cultural communication. The research concludes by underscoring the contributions of schema theory to learning and memory while also charting potential directions for future research, emphasizing areas like individual differences, neurocognitive mechanisms, and the integration of technology and other theoretical frameworks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.13785

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Buzan, T. (2003). Mind maps for kids: Study skills. Pearson Education.
  2. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Sage Publications.
  3. Leopold, C., & Sumby, W. H. (1963). Interrogation of a short-term store. Nature, 199(4895), 904- 905.
  4. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, 2. MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
-, R. M.
Venue
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2024-02-22
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2582-2160 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392774601
Cited by
19
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational methodologies and cognitive development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
schema theory, schema activation, assimilation and accommodation, schema construction, memory encoding, memory retrieval, memory consolidation, academic performance, reading comprehension, attention, critical thinking, problem solving, knowledge integration, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review