The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Fungi: 1, 2, 3 … 5.1 million species?
Abstract
• Premise of the study: Fungi are major decomposers in certain ecosystems and essential associates of many organisms. They provide enzymes and drugs and serve as experimental organisms. In 1991, a landmark paper estimated that there are 1.5 million fungi on the Earth. Because only 70000 fungi had been described at that time, the estimate has been the impetus to search for previously unknown fungi. Fungal habitats include soil, water, and organisms that may harbor large numbers of understudied fungi, estimated to outnumber plants by at least 6 to 1. More recent estimates based on high‐throughput sequencing methods suggest that as many as 5.1 million fungal species exist. • Methods: Technological advances make it possible to apply molecular methods to develop a stable classification and to discover and identify fungal taxa. • Key results: Molecular methods have dramatically increased our knowledge of Fungi in less than 20 years, revealing a monophyletic kingdom and increased diversity among early‐diverging lineages. Mycologists are making significant advances in species discovery, but many fungi remain to be discovered. • Conclusions: Fungi are essential to the survival of many groups of organisms with which they form associations. They also attract attention as predators of invertebrate animals, pathogens of potatoes and rice and humans and bats, killers of frogs and crayfish, producers of secondary metabolites to lower cholesterol, and subjects of prize‐winning research. Molecular tools in use and under development can be used to discover the world's unknown fungi in less than 1000 years predicted at current new species acquisition rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequencing technologies – the next generation
Metzker, M. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2626 · Cited by 7,066
Bhadury, P., Mohammad, B. T., & Wright, P. C. (2006) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10295-005-0070-3 · Cited by 250
Cited by
MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes
Grigoriev, I. V., Nikitin, R., Haridas, S., Kuo, A., Ohm, R., Otillar, R., Riley, R., Salamov, A., Zhao, X., Korzeniewski, F., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · Cited by 1,498
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land
Treseder, K. K., & Lennon, J. T. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00001-15 · Cited by 625
Candida auris: Epidemiology, biology, antifungal resistance, and virulence
Du, H., Bing, J., Hu, T., Ennis, C. L., Nobile, C. J., & Huang, G. (2020) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008921 · Cited by 609
What we know and don’t know about Earth's missing biodiversity
Scheffers, B. R., Joppa, L. N., Pimm, S. L., & Laurance, W. F. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.008 · Cited by 437
Pande, K., Chen, C., & Noble, S. M. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2710 · Cited by 306
Dell’ Anno, F., Rastelli, E., Sansone, C., Brunet, C., Ianora, A., & Dell’ Anno, A. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9081695 · Cited by 194
Garcia-Bustos, V., Cabañero-Navalon, M. D., Ruiz-Gaitán, A., Salavert, M., Tormo-Mas, M. Á., & Pemán, J. (2023) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2023.03.016 · Cited by 68
Are mitochondria the Achilles’ heel of the Kingdom Fungi?
Chatre, L., & Ricchetti, M. (2014) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.05.001 · Cited by 66
Ahluwalia, S. K., & Matsui, E. C. (2018) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.10.009 · Cited by 62
Antioxidant marine products in cancer chemoprevention
Park, E.-J., & Pezzuto, J. M. (2013) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5235 · Cited by 49
A closer look at the mycobiome in Alzheimer’s disease: Fungal species, pathogenesis and transmission
Phuna, Z. X., & Madhavan, P. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15599 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Blackwell, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 426-438
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2122427889
- Cited by
- 1,324
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 69.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.