The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Back to the wilds: Tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives
Abstract
The genetic diversity of our crop plants has been substantially reduced during the process of domestication and breeding. This reduction in diversity necessarily constrains our ability to expand a crop's range of cultivation into environments that are more extreme than those in which it was domesticated, including into “sustainable” agricultural systems with reduced inputs of pesticides, water, and fertilizers. Conversely, the wild progenitors of crop plants typically possess high levels of genetic diversity, which underlie an expanded (relative to domesticates) range of adaptive traits that may be of agricultural relevance, including resistance to pests and pathogens, tolerance to abiotic extremes, and reduced dependence on inputs. Despite their clear potential for crop improvement, wild relatives have rarely been used systematically for crop improvement, and in no cases, have full sets of wild diversity been introgressed into a crop. Instead, most breeding efforts have focused on specific traits and dealt with wild species in a limited and typically ad hoc manner. Although expedient, this approach misses the opportunity to test a large suite of traits and deploy the full potential of crop wild relatives in breeding for the looming challenges of the 21st century. Here we review examples of hybridization in several species, both intentionally produced and naturally occurring, to illustrate the gains that are possible. We start with naturally occurring hybrids, and then examine a range of examples of hybridization in agricultural settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome
Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Maricic, T., Stenzel, U., Kircher, M., Patterson, N., Li, H., Zhai, W., Fritz, M. H.-Y., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188021 · Cited by 4,318
Barton, N. H., & Hewitt, G. M. (1985) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553 · Cited by 2,882
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
EXTINCTION BY HYBRIDIZATION AND INTROGRESSION
Rhymer, J. M., & Simberloff, D. (1996) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83 · Cited by 2,426
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
Seed Banks and Molecular Maps: Unlocking Genetic Potential from the Wild
Tanksley, S. D., & McCouch, S. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5329.1063 · Cited by 2,353
Breeding Technologies to Increase Crop Production in a Changing World
Tester, M., & Langridge, P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183700 · Cited by 2,322
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194
The Molecular Genetics of Crop Domestication
Doebley, J. F., Gaut, B. S., & Smith, B. D. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006 · Cited by 1,979
Cited by
Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement
Brozynska, M., Furtado, A., & Henry, R. J. (2016) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12454 · Cited by 426
Hybridization in Plants: Old Ideas, New Techniques
Goulet, B. E., Roda, F., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.01340 · Cited by 355
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Prohens, J., Gramazio, P., Plazas, M., Dempewolf, H., Kilian, B., Díez, M. J., Fita, A., Herraiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Burruezo, A., Soler, S., et al. (2017) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-017-1938-9 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Warschefsky, E., Penmetsa, R. V., Cook, D. R., & von Wettberg, E. J. B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1791-1800
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2027144299
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 16.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Back to the wilds: Tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.1400116
- The paper
- Warschefsky, E., Penmetsa, R. V., Cook, D. R., & von Wettberg, E. J. B. (2014). Back to the wilds: Tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.