Cited by 90Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesPlant Parasitism and Resistance

The maize mutant barren stalk1 is defective in axillary meristem development

Ritter, Matthew K., Padilla, Christopher M., Schmidt, Robert J.·2002·American Journal of Botany

Abstract

barren stalk1 is a recessive mutant of maize that has no tassel branches, spikelets, tillers, or ears. Here we present a detailed characterization of the ba1 mutant phenotype, including scanning electron microscopy of developing inflorescences, in situ hybridization analysis using a meristem marker, molecular mapping, and genetic analysis demonstrating an epistatic relationship between ba1 and teosinte branched1 (tb1). These data show that the primary defect in the ba1 mutant is a failure in axillary meristem development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3732/ajb.89.2.203

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ROX in Arabidopsis, LAX1 in rice, and BA1 in maize influence axillary meristem development.

    “Another factor is a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein called REGULATOR OF AXILLARY MERISTEM FORMATION (ROX) in Arabidopsis (Yang et al., 2012), LAX PANICLE1 (LAX1) in rice (Komatsu et al., 2001, 2003) and BARREN STALK1 (BA1) in maize (Ritter et al., 2002; Gallavotti et al., 2004).”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Ritter et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bell A. D., 1991, Plant form
  2. Briggs S., 1992, A recessive barren‐inflorescence mutation, Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 66, 51
  3. Hofmeyer J. D. J., 1930, The inheritance and linkage relationships of barren stalk1 and barrenstalk2, two mature plant characters of maize
  4. Neuffer M. G., 1994, Designation of bif‐2, Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 68, 28
  5. Pan Y. B., 1992, ba3: a new barrenstalk mutant in Zea mays, Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 46, 291

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritter, M. K., Padilla, C. M., & Schmidt, R. J.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Robert J.
Venue
American Journal of Botany
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
203-210
ISSN
  • 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2197
OpenAlex
W2130989933
Cited by
90
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Botany (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Keywords
maize, inflorescence development, TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, epistasis, tillering, molecular mapping, recessive mutants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review