The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016 · Cited by 1,949
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5 · Cited by 1,821
Age-Related Changes in the Episodic Simulation of Future Events
Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02043.x · Cited by 660
Considering the role of semantic memory in episodic future thinking: evidence from semantic dementia
Irish, M., Addis, D. R., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws119 · Cited by 405
Episodic simulation of future events is impaired in mild Alzheimer's disease
Addis, D. R., Sacchetti, D. C., Ally, B. A., Budson, A. E., & Schacter, D. L. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.018 · Cited by 287
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales
Scott, G. G., Keitel, A., Becirspahic, M., Yao, B., & Sereno, S. C. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3 · Cited by 237
Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas
Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., McCormick, S. F., & Keuleers, E. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9 · Cited by 207
Hippocampal contributions to the episodic simulation of specific and general future events
Addis, D. R., Cheng, T., P. Roberts, R., & Schacter, D. L. (2011) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20870 · Cited by 182
Memories with a blind mind: Remembering the past and imagining the future with aphantasia
Dawes, A. J., Keogh, R., Robuck, S., & Pearson, J. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105192 · Cited by 130
Holland, A. C., Addis, D. R., & Kensinger, E. A. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.015 · Cited by 118
Brown, A. D., Addis, D. R., Romano, T. A., Marmar, C. R., Bryant, R. A., Hirst, W., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.807842 · Cited by 117
Madore, K. P., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.999097 · Cited by 103
Madore, K. P., Szpunar, K. K., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1612278113 · Cited by 104
An fMRI investigation of the relationship between future imagination and cognitive flexibility
Roberts, R. P., Wiebels, K., Sumner, R. L., van Mulukom, V., Grady, C. L., Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.019 · Cited by 58
“A list of 27 highly familiar (M = 5.48, SD = 1.01), imageable (M = 6.44, SD = 0.27) and concrete (M = 6.94, SD = 0.06) nouns was compiled from the Clark and Paivio (2004) extended norms.”
InfluentialTerrett, G., Rose, N. S., Henry, J. D., Bailey, P. E., Altgassen, M., Phillips, L. H., Kliegel, M., & Rendell, P. G. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1054294 · Cited by 57
Re-imagining the future: repetition decreases hippocampal involvement in future simulation
van Mulukom, V., Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C., & Addis, D. R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069596 · Cited by 53
Emotion word processing: does mood make a difference?
Sereno, S. C., Scott, G. G., Yao, B., Thaden, E. J., & O'Donnell, P. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01191 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 371-383
- ISSN
- 0743-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5970
- OpenAlex
- W2084090836
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
