The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can we have a distinctive theory of memory?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
Bower, G. H. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129 · Cited by 4,154
Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033773 · Cited by 820
Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.
Rundus, D. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031185 · Cited by 797
Vivid memories of emotional events: the accuracy of remembered minutiae
Heuer, F., & Reisberg, D. (1990) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03198482 · Cited by 454
Levels of processing: A critique
Eysenck, M. W. (1978) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1978.tb01643.x · Cited by 100
Cited by
Carpenter, S. K., & Delosh, E. L. (2006) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193405 · Cited by 386
Barrett, J., & Nyhof, M. (2001) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/156853701300063589 · Cited by 357
Llewellyn, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003135 · Cited by 95
Using self-generated cues to facilitate recall: a narrative review
Wheeler, R. L., & Gabbert, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01830 · Cited by 47
Memory for Expectation-Violating Concepts: The Effects of Agents and Cultural Familiarity
Porubanova, M., Shaw, D. J., McKay, R., & Xygalatas, D. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090684 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, S. R.
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 523-542
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- OpenAlex
- W2069575426
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.