The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.4.569 · Cited by 4,529
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115 · Cited by 3,276
Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., & Larson, J. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.92 · Cited by 932
World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions
Schmidt, W. C. (1997) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204826 · Cited by 620
Cognitive Inflexibility Among Ruminators and Nonruminators
Davis, R. N., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1023/a:1005591412406 · Cited by 581
Self-citation
Cited by
Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis
Johnson, D. P., & Whisman, M. A. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019 · Cited by 712
Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers
Rhodes, S. D., Bowie, D. A., & Hergenrather, K. C. (2003) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.57.1.68 · Cited by 485
Sabin, J. A., Marini, M., & Nosek, B. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048448 · Cited by 439
Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Comparison
Ritter, P., Lorig, K., Laurent, D., & Matthews, K. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e29 · Cited by 427
“Davis (1999) [6] also compared Web and paper-and-pencil versions of a personality measure (rumination), and concluded that “findings from Web-based questionnaire research are comparable with results obtained using standard procedures.””
ResultKongsved, S. M., Basnov, M., Holm-Christensen, K., & Hjollund, N. H. (2007) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, R. N.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 572-577
- ISSN
- 0743-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5970
- OpenAlex
- W1976410419
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03200737
- The paper
- Davis, R. N. (1999). Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
