The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The flanker task is a test of selective attention and response inhibition that activates the anterior cingulate cortex and pre-supplementary motor cortex [37] and provides a more efficient and reliable measure of ERN amplitude than the Stroop or Go/NoGo tasks [15, 38].”
From Altered Error Monitoring and Decreased Flanker Task Accuracy in Pediatric Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and is most commonly measured with executive function and inhibition tasks such as the Eriksen flanker task (Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974).”
From Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is associated with increased engagement of frontal brain regions across multiple event-related potentials (2023) · cites this paper as Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974
In the citing paper
“a well-validated version of the classical Eriksen flanker task (35), implemented as part of the National Institute of Health toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (36, 37)”
From Multimodal imaging of the self-regulating developing brain (2012) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Also consistent with the spatially limited scope of attentional focus, previous research has found that flanker interference decreases with increasing distance from the central target, despite response competition demands remaining constant (39, 40).”
From Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection (2007) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development
Gibson, E. J. (1973) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1572721 · Cited by 2,505
Discriminability and stimulus generalization.
Guttman, N., & Kalish, H. I. (1956) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046219 · Cited by 661
Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays
Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212870 · Cited by 594
Self-citationThe extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays
Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03198630 · Cited by 593
Self-citationPrinciples of Perceptual Learning and Development
Gibson, E. J. (1971) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/00006324-197110000-00017 · Cited by 548
Visual Resolution and Contour Interaction*
Flom, M. C., Weymouth, F. W., & Kahneman, D. J. (1963) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.53.001026 · Cited by 477
Two operations in character recognition: Some evidence from reaction-time measurements
Sternberg, S. (1967) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212460 · Cited by 401
Visual processing capacity and attentional control.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Gardner, G. T. (1972) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0032453 · Cited by 310
Reaction times and error rates for “same”-“different” judgments of multidimensional stimull
Bamber, D. (1969) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03210087 · Cited by 276
Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model
Kinchla, R. A. (1974) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205843 · Cited by 275
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,088
Wagenmakers, E. (2008) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440802205067 · Cited by 245
Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21012 · Cited by 243
Development of action monitoring through adolescence into adulthood: ERP and source localization
Ladouceur, C. D., Dahl, R. E., & Carter, C. S. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00639.x · Cited by 243
A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control.
Draheim, C., Tsukahara, J. S., Martin, J. D., Mashburn, C. A., & Engle, R. W. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000783 · Cited by 243
Theta dynamics reveal domain-specific control over stimulus and response conflict
Nigbur, R., Cohen, M. X., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Stürmer, B. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00128 · Cited by 242
Does working memory training generalize?
Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2010) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb-50-3-4-245 · Cited by 242
Schneider, W. X. (1995) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506289508401737 · Cited by 242
Brain networks of visuospatial attention and their disruption in visual neglect
Bartolomeo, P., de Schotten, M. T., & Chica, A. B. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00110 · Cited by 242
The impacts of coordinative exercise on executive function in kindergarten children: an ERP study
Chang, Y. K., Tsai, Y.-J., Chen, T. T., & Hung, T.-M. (2012) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3360-9 · Cited by 242
Object-based attention: A tutorial review
Chen, Z. (2012) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0322-z · Cited by 242
Strickland, J. C., & Johnson, M. W. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000263 · Cited by 241
Brain regions underlying response inhibition and interference monitoring and suppression
Blasi, G., Goldberg, T. E., Weickert, T., Das, S., Kohn, P., Zoltick, B., Bertolino, A., Callicott, J. H., Weinberger, D. R., & Mattay, V. S. (2006) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04680.x · Cited by 240
On the role of selective attention in visual perception
Luck, S. J., & Ford, M. A. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.825 · Cited by 240
Retrieval of Incidental Stimulus-Response Associations as a Source of Negative Priming.
Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & Houwer, J. D. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.482 · Cited by 240
Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control
Nuñez, J. M., Casey, B. J., Egner, T., Hare, T. A., & Hirsch, J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.041 · Cited by 240
Voss, M. W., Chaddock, L., Kim, J. S., VanPatter, M., Pontifex, M. B., Raine, L. B., Cohen, N. J., Hillman, C. H., & Kramer, A. F. (2011) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.009 · Cited by 242
Mullane, J. C., Corkum, P. V., Klein, R. M., & McLaughlin, E. (2009) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297040802348028 · Cited by 239
"Same"-"different" judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons.
Farell, B. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.3.419 · Cited by 238
A unified theory for matching-task phenomena.
Proctor, R. W. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.88.4.291 · Cited by 238
Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention
Remington, R. W., & Pierce, L. (1984) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206344 · Cited by 238
Geurts, H. M., van den Bergh, S. F. W. M., & Ruzzano, L. (2014) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1369 · Cited by 237
Surprise and Error: Common Neuronal Architecture for the Processing of Errors and Novelty
Wessel, J. R., Danielmeier, C., Morton, J. B., & Ullsperger, M. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6352-11.2012 · Cited by 237
The Motivated Gatekeeper of Our Minds
Roets, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Kossowska, M., Pierro, A., & Hong, Y. (2015) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.001 · Cited by 237
Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered
Schmidt, J. R. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0 · Cited by 236
Lamb, M. R., Robertson, L. C., & Knight, R. T. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.16.3.471 · Cited by 236
Cognitive control and attentional functions
Mackie, M.-A., Van Dam, N. T., & Fan, J. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.05.004 · Cited by 235
Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: Support for the conflict monitoring theory
Clayson, P. E., & Larson, M. J. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.023 · Cited by 235
Sources of Interference from Irrelevant Information: A Developmental Study
Ridderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., Band, G. P. H., & Bashore, T. R. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1997.2367 · Cited by 234
Neural Activation During Response Competition
Hazeltine, E., Poldrack, R. A., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900563984 · Cited by 234
Childhood aerobic fitness predicts cognitive performance one year later
Chaddock, L., Hillman, C. H., Pontifex, M. B., Johnson, C. R., Raine, L. B., & Kramer, A. F. (2012) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2011.647706 · Cited by 234
McDermott, J. M., Pérez‐Edgar, K. E., Henderson, H. A., Chronis-Tuscano, A. M., Pine, D. S., & Fox, N. A. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.043 · Cited by 234
Task Switching and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Cepeda, N. J., Cepeda, M. L., & Kramer, A. F. (2000) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1005143419092 · Cited by 231
Willed action and attention to the selection of action
Lau, H. C., Rogers, R. D., Ramnani, N., & Passingham, R. E. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.034 · Cited by 231
Reading minds versus following rules: Dissociating theory of mind and executive control in the brain
Saxe, R. R., Schulz, L., & Jiang, Y. V. (2006) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910601000446 · Cited by 231
Habitual Behavior Is Goal-Driven
Kruglanski, A. W., & Szumowska, E. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620917676 · Cited by 231
Traverso, L., Viterbori, P., & Usai, M. C. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00525 · Cited by 230
Coordination of executive functions in monolingual and bilingual children
Bialystok, E. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.005 · Cited by 230
Reward Counteracts Conflict Adaptation
van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02470.x · Cited by 229
Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., & Paprotta, I. (1998) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/713756776 · Cited by 228
Thompson, W. K., Barch, D. M., Bjork, J. M., Gonzalez, R., Nagel, B. J., Nixon, S. J., & Luciana, M. (2019) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.004 · Cited by 227
A Mechanism for Error Detection in Speeded Response Time Tasks.
Holroyd, C. B., Yeung, N., COLES, M. G. H., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.163 · Cited by 227
A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching
Brown, J. W., Reynolds, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2006) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005 · Cited by 226
Thompson, G. J., Magnuson, M. E., Merritt, M. D., Schwarb, H. D., Pan, W., McKinley, R. A., Tripp, L. D., Schumacher, E. H., & Keilholz, S. D. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22140 · Cited by 225
Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model.
Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., & Mozer, M. C. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.4.1011 · Cited by 225
Unfocussed spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision
Strasburger, H. (2005) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/5.11.8 · Cited by 224
ERP CORE: An open resource for human event-related potential research
Kappenman, E. S., Farrens, J. L., Zhang, W., Stewart, A. X., & Luck, S. J. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117465 · Cited by 223
Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. C. (2006) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193270 · Cited by 223
Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks
Burle, B., Vidal, F., Tandonnet, C., & Hasbroucq, T. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.004 · Cited by 223
Executive functioning in boys with ADHD: primarily an inhibition deficit?
Scheres, A. (2003) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2003.08.005 · Cited by 222
The (not so) social Simon effect: A referential coding account.
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0031031 · Cited by 222
Pizzagalli, D. A., Peccoralo, L. A., Davidson, R. J., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20172 · Cited by 222
Executive control in language processing
Ye, Z., & Zhou, X. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.003 · Cited by 222
Chaddock, L., Erickson, K. I., Prakash, R. S., Voss, M. W., VanPatter, M., Pontifex, M. B., Hillman, C. H., & Kramer, A. F. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.017 · Cited by 220
List-context effects in evaluative priming.
Klauer, K. C., Roßnagel, C. S., & Musch, J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.1.246 · Cited by 219
An electromyographic examination of response competition
Eriksen, C. W., COLES, M. G. H., Morris, L., & O’hara, W. P. (1985) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03329816 · Cited by 219
Self-citationTraining Older Adults to Use Tablet Computers: Does It Enhance Cognitive Function?
Chan, M. Y., Haber, S., Drew, L. M., & Park, D. C. (2016) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnu057 · Cited by 218
“Cognitive construct Measure Dependent variable Composite reliability Processing speed Digit Comparison Total correct on trials with three items .86 Total correct on trials with six items Total correct on trials with nine items Mental control Cogstate Identification Log RT to a 2-forced choice decision .81 Flanker Cent…”
MethodRoberts, K. L., & Hall, D. A. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20074 · Cited by 218
Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control
Wöstmann, N. M., Aichert, D. S., Costa, A., Rubia, K., Möller, H.-J., & Ettinger, U. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.010 · Cited by 217
fMRI studies of temporal attention: allocating attention within, or towards, time
Coull, J. T. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.011 · Cited by 217
Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196277 · Cited by 216
Error awareness and the error-related negativity: evaluating the first decade of evidence
Wessel, J. R. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00088 · Cited by 215
Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: resisting the call of the Sirens.
Richard Ridderinkhof, K., Forstmann, B. U., Wylie, S. A., Burle, B., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2011) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.99 · Cited by 215
Choudhary, D., Bhattacharyya, S., & Bose, S. (2017) · Journal of Dietary Supplements · doi:10.1080/19390211.2017.1284970 · Cited by 215
The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: Results from a large normative developmental sample (PING).
Akshoomoff, N. A., Newman, E. R., Thompson, W. K., McCabe, C. J., Bloss, C. S., Chang, L., Amaral, D. G., Casey, B. J., Ernst, T. M., Frazier, J. A., et al. (2013) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000001 · Cited by 215
Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming
Heij, W. L. (1988) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03214220 · Cited by 215
The effects of uncertainty in error monitoring on associated ERPs
Pailing, P. E., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.005 · Cited by 215
Attentional networks in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.
Fernandez‐Duque, D., & Black, S. E. (2006) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.133 · Cited by 215
The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search.
Carrasco, M., & Yeshurun, Y. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.673 · Cited by 215
Deficits in Social Cognition and Response Flexibility in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder
McClure, E. B., Treland, J. E., Snow, J., Schmajuk, M., Dickstein, D. P., Towbin, K. E., Charney, D. S., Pine, D. S., & Leibenluft, E. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1644 · Cited by 214
Sarı, B. A., Koster, E. H. W., Pourtois, G., & Derakshan, N. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.09.008 · Cited by 214
On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect
Houwer, J. D. (2003) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03194393 · Cited by 214
Egger, F., Benzing, V., Conzelmann, A., & Schmidt, M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212482 · Cited by 217
Miller, J. O. (1987) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203035 · Cited by 214
An information theory account of cognitive control
Fan, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00680 · Cited by 214
Hung, Y., Gaillard, S. L., Yarmak, P., & Arsalidou, M. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24232 · Cited by 212
Multimodal imaging of the self-regulating developing brain
Fjell, A. M., Walhovd, K. B., Brown, T. T., Kuperman, J. M., Chung, Y., Hagler, D. J., Venkatraman, V., Roddey, J. C., Erhart, M., McCabe, C., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208243109 · Cited by 212
Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., & Davis‐Stober, C. P. (2004) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-39 · Cited by 212
Pontifex, M. B., Scudder, M. R., Brown, M. L., O’Leary, K. C., Wu, C.-T., Themanson, J. R., & Hillman, C. H. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00974.x · Cited by 212
Yow, W. Q., & Li, X. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00164 · Cited by 211
Ratcliff, R., & Frank, M. J. (2012) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00270 · Cited by 211
Conflict monitoring and error processing: New insights from simultaneous EEG–fMRI
Iannaccone, R., Hauser, T. U., Staempfli, P., Walitza, S., Brandeis, D., & Brem, S. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.028 · Cited by 210
Look Here but Ignore What You See: Effects of Distractors at Fixation.
Beck, D. M., & Lavie, N. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.592 · Cited by 210
Romer, D., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., Farah, M., & Hurt, H. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.019 · Cited by 209
Kousaie, S., & Phillips, N. A. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.052 · Cited by 209
van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610385951 · Cited by 209
Valdés-Sosa, M. J., Bobes, M. A., Rodrı́guez, V., & Pinilla, T. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998563743 · Cited by 209
Schmidt, J. R., & Houwer, J. D. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.002 · Cited by 208
Durston, S. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.004 · Cited by 207
Performance monitoring and error significance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder
Endrass, T., Schuermann, B., Kaufmann, C., Spielberg, R., Kniesche, R., & Kathmann, N. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.02.002 · Cited by 206
Leyland, A., Rowse, G., & Emerson, L.-M. (2019) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000425 · Cited by 206
Attentional interference at small spatial separations
Bahcall, D. O., & Kowler, E. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00090-x · Cited by 206
Self-Assessment of Individual Differences in Language Switching
Rodríguez‐Fornells, A., Krämer, U. M., Lorenzo‐Seva, U., Festman, J., & Münte, T. F. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00388 · Cited by 206
Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder
Remington, A. (2010) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 208
Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes.
Gehring, W. J., Gratton, G., COLES, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.198 · Cited by 205
Riesel, A., Weinberg, A., Endraß, T., Meyer, A., & Hajcak, G. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.007 · Cited by 204
Less attentional selectivity as a result of declining inhibition in older adults
Tipper, S. P. (1991) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03334765 · Cited by 204
The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention.
Maylor, E. A., & Lavie, N. (1998) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.563 · Cited by 203
Failure of spatial selectivity in vision
Gatti, S. V., & Egeth, H. E. (1978) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03336801 · Cited by 203
Neuroanatomical substrates of executive functions: beyond prefrontal structures
Bettcher, B. M., Mungas, D., Patel, N., Elofson, J., Dutt, S., Wynn, M., Watson, C. L., Stephens, M., Walsh, C. M., & Kramer, J. H. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.001 · Cited by 202
Röthlisberger, M., Neuenschwander, R., Cimeli, P., Michel, E., & Roebers, C. M. (2011) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.752 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Perception & Psychophysics
- Published
- 1974-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-149
- ISSN
- 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5962
- OpenAlex
- W2058317558
- Cited by
- 7,230
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 285 · 2025: 374 · 2024: 382 · 2023: 374 · 2022: 393 · 2021: 448 · 2020: 421 · 2019: 364 · 2018: 400 · 2017: 305 · 2016: 310 · 2015: 307 · 2014: 324 · 2013: 257 · 2012: 254
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- letter recognition, response compatibility, response inhibition, response sets, reaction time, tachistoscopic presentation, channel capacity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review