Cited by 231Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Task Switching and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Cepeda, Nicholas J., Cepeda, Manuel L., Kramer, Arthur F.·2000·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

The main goal of the present set of studies was to examine the efficiency of executive control processes and, more specifically, the control processes involved in task set inhibition and preparation to perform a new task in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and non-ADHD children. This was accomplished by having ADHD children, both on and off medication, and non-ADHD children perform the task-switching paradigm, which involves the performance of two simple tasks. In nonswitch trials, an individual task is performed repeatedly for a number of trials. In switch trials, subjects must rapidly and accurately switch from one task to the other, either in a predictable or unpredictable sequence. Switch costs are calculated by subtracting performance on the nonswitch trials from performance on the switch trials. These costs are assumed to reflect the executive control processes required for the coordination of multiple tasks. ADHD children showed substantially larger switch costs than non-ADHD children. However, when on medication, the ADHD children's switch performance was equivalent to control children. In addition, medication was observed to improve the ADHD children's ability to inhibit inappropriate responses. These data are discussed in terms of models of ADHD and cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005143419092

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with ADHD appear mainly challenged by switch paradigms, not by the ID/ED task.

    “However, the discrepancies in cognitive flexibility findings might not be so straight forward because ADHD children seem to be primarily challenged on switch paradigms [70,71] but not on the ID/ED task [29,32,34,35].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [70]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cepeda, N. J., Cepeda, M. L., & Kramer, A. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of South Alabama (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2000-06
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
213-226
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W1557440383
Cited by
231
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag012203-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG12203)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, task switching, executive function, switch costs, ADHD medication, children, response inhibition, task preparation
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Mental Processes, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review