Cited by 238Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersNeuroscience and Music Perception

Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants

Open access
Eimas, Peter D.·1974·Perception & Psychophysics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03198580

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants discriminate only between stimuli from different phonetic categories.

    “Infants discriminated only between stimuli from different phonetic categories (12–14).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [13]

  • The initial perceptual biases shown by infants in tests of categorical perception, as well as asymmetries in perception seen in infancy, produce a contouring of the perceptual space that is universal.

    “The important point regarding development is that the initial perceptual biases shown by infants in tests of categorical perception (12–16), as well as asymmetries in perception seen in infancy (80, 81), produce a contouring of the perceptual space that is universal.”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. ABRAMSON, A. S., & LISKER, L. Discriminability along with voic- ing continuum: Cross-language tests. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Prague. 1967. Prague: Academia, 1970. Pp. 569-573.
  2. CUTTING, 1. E., & EIMAS, P. D. Phonetic feature analyzers in the processing of speech by infants. In J. Kavanagh and J. E. Cutting (Eds.), The role of speech in language. Cambridge, Mass: M.LT. Press, in press.
  3. FUJISAKI, H .. & KAWASHIMA, T. On the modes and mechanisms of speech perception. Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute, Vol. 28, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 1969. Pp. 67-73.
  4. LISKER, L., & ABRAMSON, A. S. The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. in Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress ofPhonetic Sciences. Prague, 1967. Prague: Academia, 1970. Pp. 563-567.
  5. MIYAWAKI, K., LIBERMAN, A. M., FUJIMURA, 0., STRANGE, W., & JENKINS, J. J. Cross-language study of the perception of the F3 cue for [r] versus [I] in speech and nonspeech patterns. Paper presented at the XXth International Congress of Psychology, Tokyo, 1972. (Also in Status Report on Speech Research, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, 1973, SR-33. Pp. 67-76.)
  6. MOLFESE, D. L. Cerebral asymmetry in infants, children and adults: Auditory evoked responses to speech and noise stimuli. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Pennsylvania State Univer- sity, 1972.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eimas, P. D.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Eimas, Peter D.
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
1974-05
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
513-521
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W2036502752
Cited by
238
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
place of articulation, infant speech perception, categorical perception, acoustic cues, synthetic speech, language processing, auditory processing, infant language development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review