Cited by 49Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage and cultural evolutionAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Auditory perception and the evolution of speech

Kuhl, P. K.·1988·Human Evolution

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02436589

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhl, P. K.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Kuhl, P. K.
Venue
Human Evolution
Published
1988-02
Volume
3
Issue
1-2
Pages
19-43
ISSN
  • 0393-9375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1824-310X
OpenAlex
W1991431694
Cited by
49
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Evolution (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
speech evolution, auditory perception, speech perception, phonetic categories, speech production, infant language development, non-human primates, animal vocal communication, language evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review