Cited by 340Categorization, perception, and languageMemory Processes and InfluencesFace Recognition and Perception

The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference

Open access
Roberson, Debi, Davidoff, Jules·2000·Memory & Cognition

Abstract

A series of five experiments examined the categorical perception previously found for color and facial expressions. Using a two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory paradigm, it was found that verbal interference selectively removed the defining feature of categorical perception. Under verbal interference, there was no longer the greater accuracy normally observed for cross-category judgments relative to within-category judgments. The advantage for cross-category comparisons in memory appeared to derive from verbal coding both at encoding and at storage. It thus appears that while both visual and verbal codes may be employed in the recognition memory for colors and facial expressions, subjects only made use of verbal coding when demonstrating categorical perception.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03209345

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent behavioral studies show that categorical perception of discrete emotion is supported by language.

    “In locationist accounts, language is thought to be epiphenomenal to discrete emotion (Ekman & Cordano, in press), although recent behavioral studies show that categorical perception of discrete emotion is supported by language (Fugate et al. 2010; Roberson & Davidoff 2000; Roberson et al. 2007).”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Roberson & Davidoff 2000

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. ANDRICK, G. R., & TAGER-FLUSBERG, H. (1986). The acquisition of color terms. Journal ofChild Language, 13, 119-134.
  2. BARTLETT, 1. c, TILL, R. E., & LEVY, 1. C. (1980). Retrieval character- istics of complex pictures: Effects of verbal encoding. Journal ofVer- bal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19,430-449.
  3. BERLIN, B., & KAY, P. (1969). Basic terms: Their universality and evo- lution. Berkeley: University of Cali forni a Press.
  4. BORNSTEIN, M. H., KESSEN, W., & WEISKOPF, S. (1976). Color vision and hue categorization in young human infants. Journal of Experi- mental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2,115-129.
  5. BOURKE, P. A., DUNCAN, 1., & NIMMO-SMITH, I. (1996). A general fac- tor involved in dual-task performance decrement. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 49A, 525-545.
  6. BROWN. R. w., & LENNEBERG, E. H. (1954). A study in language and cognition. Journal ofAbnormal & Social Psychology, 49. 454-462.
  7. EKMAN, P. (1992). Facial expressions of emotion: An old controversy and new findings. Philosophical Transactions ofthe Royal Society of London: Series B, 335, 63-69.
  8. HARNAD, S. (1987). Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categori- cal perception: A critical overview. In S. Hamad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. LOFTus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. MULLIGAN, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item- specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psv- chology: Learning, Memorv, & Cognition, 25, 54-69.
  11. NELSON, D. L., & BROOKS, D. H. (1973). Functional independence of pictures and their verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 44-48.
  12. READ, J. D. (1979). Rehearsal and recognition of human faces. Ameri- can Journal ofPsychology, 92, 71-85.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberson, D., & Davidoff, J.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Davidoff, Jules
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
2000-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
977-986
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W2052765867
Cited by
340
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
categorical perception, color perception, facial expressions, verbal interference, recognition memory, verbal encoding, visual coding
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Color Perception, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Semantics, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review