Cited by 85Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceFace Recognition and Perception

Neural correlates of emotional intelligence in adolescent children

Open access
KILLGORE, W. D. S., YURGELUN-TODD, D. A.·2007·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The somatic marker hypothesis posits a key role for the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and insula in the ability to utilize emotions to guide decision making and behavior. However, the relationship between activity in these brain regions and emotional intelligence (EQ) during adolescence, a time of particular importance for emotional and social development, has not been studied. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we correlated scores from the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory, Youth Version (EQ-i:YV) with brain activity during perception of fearful faces in 16 healthy children and adolescents. Consistent with the neural efficiency hypothesis, higher EQ correlated negatively with activity in the somatic marker circuitry and other paralimbic regions. Positive correlations were observed between EQ and activity in the cerebellum and visual association cortex. The findings suggest that the construct of self-reported EQ in adolescents is inversely related to the efficiency of neural processing within the somatic marker circuitry during emotional provocation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/cabn.7.2.140

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In active conditions during an emotionally provocative task involving the perception of fearful faces, trait EI was negatively related to brain activity in adolescents.

    “In active conditions, i.e., during an emotionally provocative task involving the perception of fearful faces, Killgore and Yurgelun-Todd (2007) found that trait EI was negatively related to brain activity in adolescents.”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Killgore and Yurgelun-Todd (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KILLGORE, W. D. S., & YURGELUN-TODD, D. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • KILLGORE, W. D. S.
  • YURGELUN-TODD, D. A.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
140-151
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2061133012
Cited by
85
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1 R03 HD41542-01, R03HD041542)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
emotional intelligence, adolescents, somatic marker hypothesis, neural efficiency hypothesis, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, insula, cerebellum, visual association cortex, emotional processing, Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Intelligence, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Personality Inventory, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review