The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749308401045 · Cited by 2,187
The many faces of configural processing
Maurer, D., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01903-4 · Cited by 2,110
The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces
Kanwisher, N., & Yovel, G. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1934 · Cited by 1,718
Self-citationWhy faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. E. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.107 · Cited by 1,584
A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition
Valentine, T. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749108400966 · Cited by 1,386
Configurational Information in Face Perception
Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p160747 · Cited by 1,351
Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107 · Cited by 1,301
Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555 · Cited by 662
Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing
Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p3339 · Cited by 654
Features and their configuration in face recognition
Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03211301 · Cited by 583
Cited by
A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.
Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037004 · Cited by 340
Individual recognition and the ‘face inversion effect’ in medaka fish (Oryzias latipes)
Wang, M.-Y., & Takeuchi, H. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.24728 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- McKone, E., & Yovel, G.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 778-797
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2017586895
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/pbr.16.5.778
- The paper
- McKone, E., & Yovel, G. (2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.16.5.778
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
