The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The search for an input-coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Finally, it is interesting to note the fact that standard TL priming effects are not found in Semitic languages, at least for the true Semitic words of these languages (Velan and Frost, 2009, 2011; Perea et al., 2010).”
From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Perea et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The overlap model: A model of letter position coding.
Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0012667 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2005). Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 207–260. · DOI
- Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Aralex: A lexical database for Modern Standard Arabic. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 481–487. · DOI
- Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1327–1339. · DOI
- Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
- Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposedletter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691–703. · DOI
- Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: Delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1930–1947. · DOI
- Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. · DOI
- Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew versus reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCardle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235–254). New York: Psychology Press.
- Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1293–1326. · DOI
- Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2004). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: “Some words to talk about words” (pp. 1–24). Hauppage, NY: Nova.
- Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 322–326. · DOI
- Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory & Language, 60, 530–542. · DOI
- Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 418–422. · DOI
- Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829–841. · DOI
- Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97–120). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
- Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). La posición de las letras externas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras. Psicothema, 19, 559–564.
- Perea, M., & Pérez, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 67–88. · DOI
- Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 785–794. · DOI
- Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367. · DOI · Paper page
- Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913–918. · DOI
- Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009). Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory & Language, 61, 285–302. · DOI · Paper page
- Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 · Cited by 459
A tale of one letter: morphological processing in early Arabic spelling.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2013) · Writing Systems Research · doi:10.1080/17586801.2013.857586 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Perea, M., Mallouh, R. A., & Carreiras, M.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 375-380
- ISSN
- 1069-9384
- 1531-5320
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
