Cited by 44Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli

Open access
Le Pelley, Mike E., Seabrooke, Tina, Kennedy, Briana L., Pearson, Daniel, Most, Steven B.·2017·Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

Abstract

Recent studies of visual search suggest that learning about valued outcomes (rewards and punishments) influences the likelihood that distractors will capture spatial attention and slow search for a target, even when those value-related distractors have never themselves been the targets of search. In the present study, we demonstrated a related effect in the context of temporal, rather than spatial, selection. Participants were presented with a temporal stream of pictures in a fixed central location and had to identify the orientation of a rotated target picture. Response accuracy was reduced if the rotated target was preceded by a "valued" distractor picture that signaled that a correct response to the target would be rewarded (and an incorrect response punished), relative to a distractor picture that did not signal reward or punishment. This effect of signal value on response accuracy was short-lived, being most prominent with a short lag between distractor and target. Impairment caused by a valued distractor was observed if participants were explicitly instructed regarding its relation to reward/punishment (Exps. 1, 3, and 4), or if they could learn this relationship only via trial-by-trial experience (Exp. 2). These findings show that the influence of signal value on attentional capture extends to temporal selection, and also demonstrate that value-related distractors can interfere with the conscious perception of subsequent target information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13414-017-1346-1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Capture occurs for physically nonsalient and task-irrelevant stimuli when their reward-association is either made explicit or implicitly learned.

    “Indeed, capture also occurs for physically nonsalient and task-irrelevant stimuli when their reward-association is either made explicit or implicitly learned (Bucker & Theeuwes, 2017a; Failing et al., 2015; Failing & Theeuwes, 2017; Le Pelley et al., 2017).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Le Pelley et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le Pelley, M. E., Seabrooke, T., Kennedy, B. L., Pearson, D., & Most, S. B.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Published
2017-06-05
Volume
79
Issue
6
Pages
1628-1642
ISSN
  • 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-393X
OpenAlex
W2622936046
Cited by
44
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (FT120100707)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
attentional capture, temporal selection, reward and punishment, visual search, conscious perception, trial-by-trial learning
MeSH terms
Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Reaction Time, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review