Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies of visual search suggest that learning about valued outcomes (rewards and punishments) influences the likelihood that distractors will capture spatial attention and slow search for a target, even when those value-related distractors have never themselves been the targets of search. In the present study, we demonstrated a related effect in the context of temporal, rather than spatial, selection. Participants were presented with a temporal stream of pictures in a fixed central location and had to identify the orientation of a rotated target picture. Response accuracy was reduced if the rotated target was preceded by a "valued" distractor picture that signaled that a correct response to the target would be rewarded (and an incorrect response punished), relative to a distractor picture that did not signal reward or punishment. This effect of signal value on response accuracy was short-lived, being most prominent with a short lag between distractor and target. Impairment caused by a valued distractor was observed if participants were explicitly instructed regarding its relation to reward/punishment (Exps. 1, 3, and 4), or if they could learn this relationship only via trial-by-trial experience (Exp. 2). These findings show that the influence of signal value on attentional capture extends to temporal selection, and also demonstrate that value-related distractors can interfere with the conscious perception of subsequent target information.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Capture occurs for physically nonsalient and task-irrelevant stimuli when their reward-association is either made explicit or implicitly learned.
“Indeed, capture also occurs for physically nonsalient and task-irrelevant stimuli when their reward-association is either made explicit or implicitly learned (Bucker & Theeuwes, 2017a; Failing et al., 2015; Failing & Theeuwes, 2017; Le Pelley et al., 2017).”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Le Pelley et al., 2017
Cites
Ironic processes of mental control.
Wegner, D. M. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.101.1.34 · Cited by 2,609 · see citing works
Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink?
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849 · Cited by 1,649 · see citing works
Perceptual selectivity for color and form
Theeuwes, J. (1992) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211656 · Cited by 1,649 · see citing works
Attention and associative learning in humans: An integrative review.
Le Pelley, M. E., Mitchell, C. J., Beesley, T., George, D. N., & Wills, A. J. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000064 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Le Pelley, M. E., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., & Beesley, T. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000037 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Self-citationAttention, Reward, and Information Seeking
Gottlieb, J., Hayhoe, M., Hikosaka, O., & Rangel, A. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3270-14.2014 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
An emotion-induced attentional blink elicited by aversively conditioned stimuli.
Smith, S. D., Most, S. B., Newsome, L. A., & Zald, D. H. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.523 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing
Bucker, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2014) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0278-7 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y · Cited by 345 · see citing works
“Indeed, capture also occurs for physically nonsalient and task-irrelevant stimuli when their reward-association is either made explicit or implicitly learned (Bucker & Theeuwes, 2017a; Failing et al., 2015; Failing & Theeuwes, 2017; Le Pelley et al., 2017).”
Background
- Authors
- Le Pelley, M. E., Seabrooke, T., Kennedy, B. L., Pearson, D., & Most, S. B.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- Published
- 2017-06-05
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1628-1642
- ISSN
- 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-393X
- OpenAlex
- W2622936046
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Attention Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (FT120100707)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- attentional capture, temporal selection, reward and punishment, visual search, conscious perception, trial-by-trial learning
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Reaction Time, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review