Cited by 17Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Social comparison modulates reward-driven attentional capture

Open access
Jiao, Jun, Du, Feng, He, Xiaosong, Zhang, Kan·2015·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

It is well established that attention can be captured by task irrelevant and non-salient objects associated with value through reward learning. However, it is unknown whether social comparison influences reward-driven attentional capture. The present study created four social contexts to examine whether different social comparisons modulate the reward-driven capture of attention. The results showed that reward-driven attentional capture varied with different social comparison conditions. Most prominently, reward-driven attentional capture is dramatically reduced in the disadvantageous social comparison context, in which an individual is informed that the other participant is earning more monetary reward for performing the same task. These findings suggest that social comparison can affect the reward-driven capture of attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-015-0812-9

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In moments when action is planned and executed, higher performance expectancies may serve as a buffer or protection against responses that would detract from optimal performance, such as nonbeneficial alternate responses, off-task activity, or self-referential thinking.

    “In the moments when action is planned and executed, higher performance expectancies may also serve as a buffer or protection against responses that would detract from optimal performance, such as nonbeneficial alternate responses, including off-task activity (Jiao et al., 2015;Zahodne, Nowinski, Gershon, & Manly, 2015) or self-referential thinking.”
  • Expectations can influence working memory, long-term memory, and attentional capture, biasing them toward expected stimuli.

    “Expectations can influence working memory, long-term memory, and attentional capture, biasing them toward expected stimuli (Bollinger, Rubens, Zanto, & Gazzaley, 2010;Jiao, Du, He & Zhang, 2015;Shomstein & Johnson, 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. (1994). Using confidence intervalsin within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 476-490.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiao, J., Du, F., He, X., & Zhang, K.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Du, Feng
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2015-02-25
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
1278-1284
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W1993771889
Cited by
17
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470982, 31200766, KJZDEW-L04)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y4CX033008, KJZD‐EW‐L04)
  • Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y4CX033008)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
social comparison, attentional capture, reward learning, monetary rewards, social environment
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Color Perception, Culture, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Hierarchy, Social, Humans, Deception, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Random Allocation, Reward, Social Identification, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review