Cited by 132Emotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The envious brain: The neural basis of social comparison

Open access
Dvash, Jonathan, Gilam, Gadi, Ben‐Ze'ev, Aharon, Hendler, Talma, Shamay‐Tsoory, Simone G.·2010·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Humans have a drive to evaluate themselves by examining their abilities and outcomes in comparison to others. The present study examined the emotional and neural correlates of upward social comparison (comparison with those who have more) and downward social comparison (comparison with those who have less). Two experiments were conducted with volunteers in an interactive game of chance, in which a putative player won or lost more money than the participant. The results showed that even when participants lost money, they expressed joy and schadenfreude (gloating) if the other player had lost more money. On the other hand when they actually won money, but the other player had won more they expressed envy. This pattern was also demonstrated in a differential BOLD response in the ventral striatum. Comparing the activations between an actual gain and a relative gain indicated that even when a person loses money, merely adding information about another person's greater loss may increase ventral striatum activations to a point where these activations are similar to those of an actual gain. We suggest that the ventral striatum plays a role in mediating the emotional consequences of social comparison. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20972

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ventral striatum activity is greater when we gain a larger reward than someone else or even lose less than someone else.

    “Ventral striatum activity is greater when we gain a larger reward than someone else or even lose less than someone else 82–84.”
  • Reward signals in the striatum are sensitive to comparisons of our own reward outcomes and status with those of other people.

    “Research has suggested that reward signals in the striatum are sensitive to comparisons of our own reward outcomes and status with those of other people.”
  • We make decisions to try to gain better outcomes than someone else.

    “Even when our own outcomes do not depend on other people, we prefer when our own outcomes are better than someone else's and we make decisions to try to gain better outcomes than someone else 82, 83.”
  • Even when our own outcomes do not depend on other people, we prefer when our own outcomes are better than someone else's.

    “Even when our own outcomes do not depend on other people, we prefer when our own outcomes are better than someone else's and we make decisions to try to gain better outcomes than someone else 82, 83.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988): Coplanar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dvash, J., Gilam, G., Ben‐Ze'ev, A., Hendler, T., & Shamay‐Tsoory, S. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-04
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
1741-1750
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W1979614846
Cited by
132
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
social comparison, envy, schadenfreude, upward social comparison, downward social comparison, ventral striatum, neural correlates of emotion, relative gains, games of chance, BOLD signal
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Jealousy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Social Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review