Cited by 159Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

Cognitive-behavioral treatments for tinnitus: a review of the literature

Cima, Rilana F.F., Andersson, Gerhard, Schmidt, Caroline J., Henry, James A.·2014·Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus can be defined as the perception of an auditory sensation, perceivable without the presence of an external sound. PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to systematically review the peer-reviewed literature on treatment approaches for tinnitus based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and to provide a historical overview of developments within these approaches. RESEARCH DESIGN: Experimental studies, (randomized) trials, follow-up assessments, and reviews assessing educational, counseling, psychological, and CBT treatment approaches were identified as a result of an electronic database metasearch. RESULTS: A total of 31 (of the initial 75 studies) were included in the review. Results confirm that CBT treatment for tinnitus management is the most evidence-based treatment option so far. Though studied protocols are diverse and are usually a combination of different treatment elements, and tinnitus diagnostics and outcome assessments vary over investigations, a common ground of therapeutic elements was established, and evidence was found to be robust enough to guide clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategy might best be CBT-based, moving toward a more multidisciplinary approach. There is room for the involvement of different disciplines, using a stepped-care approach. This may provide brief and effective treatment for a larger group of tinnitus patients, and additional treatment steps can be provided for those suffering on a more severe level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3766/jaaa.25.1.4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT has been proven to significantly reduce tinnitus-related distress, anxiety, and depression, and improve quality of life for tinnitus patients.

    “it has been proven to significantly reduce tinnitus-related distress, anxiety, and depression, and improve the quality of life for tinnitus patients (Cima et al., 2014).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cima, R. F. F., Andersson, G., Schmidt, C. J., & Henry, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
Published
2014-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
29-61
ISSN
1050-0545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123714624
Cited by
155
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
tinnitus, cognitive behavioral therapy, tinnitus treatment, evidence-based treatment, stepped care, multidisciplinary care, counseling, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Patient Care Team, Perceptual Masking, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Tinnitus, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review