Cited by 21Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNoise Effects and Management

Assessing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy intervention for tinnitus using behavioural measures and structural MRI: a pilot study

Husain, Fatima T., Zimmerman, Benjamin, Tai, Yihsin, Finnegan, Megan K., Kay, Emily, Khan, Faaiza, Menard, Christopher, Gobin, Robyn L.·2019·International Journal of Audiology

Abstract

Objective: We used a minimally-modified version of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) to treat symptoms of distress associated with tinnitus.Design: Audiological screening (establishing a baseline) was conducted prior to treatment and at three time-points: pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up, 8 weeks after completion of training. MRI tests were also conducted at these three time-points.Study sample: Twenty-one participants were enrolled in the study, of whom 15 completed training and audiological testing and eight completed the MRI portion of the study.Results: Scores on tinnitus-related questionnaires showed a significant decline either from pre- to post-intervention or from pre-intervention to follow-up, despite no significant change during baseline. Voxel-based morphometric analysis of the structural MRI scans revealed clusters in bilateral superior frontal gyrus that exhibited significant increases in grey matter volume over the period of intervention and follow-up. Further, grey matter changes in occipital and cingulate regions correlated with declines in tinnitus handicap.Conclusions: This pilot study supports MBCT as an adequate approach for treating distressing tinnitus and suggests that neuroanatomical changes may reflect reductions in tinnitus-related severity. Although our small sample size precludes drawing strong conclusions, there is potential for assessing neuroanatomical changes due to mindfulness-based interventions in tinnitus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14992027.2019.1629655

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Husain, F. T., Zimmerman, B., Tai, Y., Finnegan, M. K., Kay, E., Khan, F., Menard, C., & Gobin, R. L.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Husain, Fatima T.
Venue
International Journal of Audiology
Published
2019-06-21
Volume
58
Issue
12
Pages
889-901
ISSN
  • 1499-2027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8186
OpenAlex
W2950643058
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Audiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Seed Grant for the Center on Wounded Veterans in Higher Education
  • Beckman Institute of Advanced Science and Technology
  • College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
tinnitus, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, tinnitus distress, tinnitus handicap, gray matter volume, superior frontal gyrus, cingulate cortex, occipital cortex, neuroanatomical changes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Hearing, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Tinnitus, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Mindfulness, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review