Cited by 55Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

Exploring tinnitus heterogeneity

Open access
Eldre Wiida Beukes, Vinaya K C Manchaiah, Peter M. Allen, Gerhard Andersson, David Baguley·2021·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Introduction Tinnitus experiences differ widely. A greater understanding of the core processes underlying these variations is needed. Moreover, meaningful definitions for different subgroups are required to better manage this heterogeneous population. The objective of the present research was to contribute toward the understanding of tinnitus heterogeneity by identifying factors that can predict tinnitus severity and to ascertain if distinct subgroups of tinnitus presentation can be identified.Methods This cross-sectional study consisted of 326 adults subdivided into subgroups of those with mild tinnitus (n=32; 10%), significant tinnitus (n=99; 30%) and severe tinnitus (n=195; 60%) according to their scores from the Tinnitus Functional Index. Multiple regression was used to identify factors associated with tinnitus severity. These factors included personal traits, tinnitus-related traits, treatment modalities and clinical comorbidities.Results Insomnia, hearing distress, and anxiety were the best predictors of tinnitus severity (explaining 53% of the variability). These comorbidities were stronger predictors than any demographical factors (that explained 11% of the variability). Distinct subgroups based on tinnitus severity (mild, significant, and severe) and anxiety levels were evident. Those with severe tinnitus had significantly more severe comorbidities compared with the mild and significant groups.Conclusions This study highlights that people with tinnitus could initially be grouped according to tinnitus severity to direct further management. Those with higher tinnitus severity should receive more immediate and intensive care. Due to the strong associations between tinnitus severity and tinnitus-related comorbidities (e.g., insomnia, hearing disability, and anxiety), tinnitus assessment and interventions should focus on these comorbidities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.022

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beukes, E. W., Manchaiah, V. K. C., Allen, P. M., Andersson, G., & Baguley, D.
Affiliations
  • Lamar University (US)
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Eldre Wiida Beukes
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2021
Volume
260
Pages
79-99
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045337790
Cited by
55
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
15.01
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
tinnitus, tinnitus severity, Tinnitus Functional Index, insomnia, hearing handicap, anxiety, comorbidities, tinnitus management
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Tinnitus, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review