Cited by 23Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Comorbidity and its Impact in Adult Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Primary Care Perspective

Babcock, Thomas, Ornstein, Craig S.·2009·Postgraduate Medicine

Abstract

The objective of this manuscript was to review the literature relevant to the primary care practitioner concerning comorbidity and its impact on diagnosis and treatment efficacy in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A MEDLINE literature review was performed using the keywords: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; psychiatric comorbidity; bipolar disorder; major depressive disorder; oppositional defiant disorder; conduct disorder; and substance use disorder. The authors assessed and summarized literature identified as relevant to primary care practitioners. Results demonstrated high rates of psychiatric comorbidity in patients with ADHD. These comorbid disorders, coupled with the differing characteristics of ADHD symptoms in adults versus children, may complicate accurate diagnosis and treatment of ADHD. Controlled clinical trials indicate that the presence of comorbidity does not substantially alter the safety and efficacy of ADHD pharmacotherapy and that treatment of ADHD can sometimes improve symptoms of the comorbid disorder. Although rates of psychiatric comorbidity are high in adults with ADHD, available data suggest that the benefits of pharmacotherapy for ADHD are not compromised by the presence of psychiatric comorbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3810/pgm.2009.05.2005

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babcock, T., & Ornstein, C. S.
Affiliations
Takeda (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Babcock, Thomas
Venue
Postgraduate Medicine
Published
2009-05
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
73-82
ISSN
  • 0032-5481 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-9260
OpenAlex
W2148883596
Cited by
23
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Postgraduate Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
adult ADHD, psychiatric comorbidity, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, substance use disorders, ADHD medication, treatment efficacy, ADHD diagnosis, primary care
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Primary Health Care, Psychotic Disorders, Global Health, Comorbidity, Conduct Disorder, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review