Cited by 339Smoking Behavior and CessationMental Health Treatment and AccessSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Smoking characteristics of adults with selected lifetime mental illnesses: results from the 2007 national health interview survey

Open access
McClave, Annette K., McKnight-Eily, Lela R., Davis, Shane P., Dube, Shanta R.·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We estimated smoking prevalence, frequency, intensity, and cessation attempts among US adults with selected diagnosed lifetime mental illnesses. METHODS: We used data from the 2007 National Health Interview Survey on 23 393 noninstitutionalized US adults to obtain age-adjusted estimates of smoking prevalence, frequency, intensity, and cessation attempts for adults screened as having serious psychological distress and persons self-reporting bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, attention deficit disorder or hyperactivity, dementia, or phobias or fears. RESULTS: The age-adjusted smoking prevalence of adults with mental illness or serious psychological distress ranged from 34.3% (phobias or fears) to 59.1% (schizophrenia) compared with 18.3% of adults with no such illness. Smoking prevalence increased with the number of comorbid mental illnesses. Cessation attempts among persons with diagnosed mental illness or serious psychological distress were comparable to attempts among adults without mental illnesses or distress; however, lower quit ratios were observed among adults with these diagnoses, indicating lower success in quitting. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of current smoking was higher among persons with mental illnesses than among adults without mental illnesses. Our findings stress the need for prevention and cessation efforts targeting adults with mental illnesses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2009.188136

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClave, A. K., McKnight-Eily, L. R., Davis, S. P., & Dube, S. R.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-12
Volume
100
Issue
12
Pages
2464-2472
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2024203641
Cited by
339
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
smoking prevalence, mental illness, serious psychological distress, smoking cessation, quit attempts, smoking intensity, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dementia, phobia, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, Stress, Psychological, United States, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review