The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
KEPLER INPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION
Open accessAbstract
We describe the photometric calibration and stellar classification methods used by the Stellar Classification Project to produce the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC). The KIC is a catalog containing photometric and physical data for sources in the Kepler mission field of view; it is used by the mission to select optimal targets. Four of the visible-light ( g , r , i , z ) magnitudes used in the KIC are tied to Sloan Digital Sky Survey magnitudes; the fifth ( D 51) is an AB magnitude calibrated to be consistent with Castelli & Kurucz (CK) model atmosphere fluxes. We derived atmospheric extinction corrections from hourly observations of secondary standard fields within the Kepler field of view. For these filters and extinction estimates, repeatability of absolute photometry for stars brighter than magnitude 15 is typically 2%. We estimated stellar parameters { T eff , log ( g ), log ( Z ), E B − V } using Bayesian posterior probability maximization to match observed colors to CK stellar atmosphere models. We applied Bayesian priors describing the distribution of solar-neighborhood stars in the color–magnitude diagram, in log ( Z ), and in height above the galactic plane. Several comparisons with samples of stars classified by other means indicate that for 4500 K ⩽ T eff ⩽ 6500 K, our classifications are reliable within about ±200 K and 0.4 dex in log ( g ) for dwarfs, with somewhat larger log ( g ) uncertainties for giants. It is difficult to assess the reliability of our log ( Z ) estimates, but there is reason to suspect that it is poor, particularly at extreme T eff . Comparisons between the CK models and observed colors are generally satisfactory with some exceptions, notably for stars cooler than 4500 K. Of great importance for the Kepler mission, for T eff ⩽ 5400 K, comparison with asteroseismic results shows that the distinction between main-sequence stars and giants is reliable with about 98% confidence. Larger errors in log ( g ) occur for warmer stars, for which our filter set provides inadequate gravity diagnostics. The KIC is available through the MAST data archive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D., Schneider, S., Carpenter, J. M., Beichman, C., Capps, R., Chester, T., Elias, J., et al. (2006) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/498708 · Cited by 12,019
Kepler planet-detection mission: Introduction and first results
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T., Caldwell, D., Caldwell, J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185402 · Cited by 4,035
Self-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033 · cited 14×
“These included a set of 4 Sun-like stars chosen from the list of SDSS standard stars (Smith et al. 2002), a set of 63 to 77 stars (depending on the filter involved) in the cluster M67, each of them known to be single from spectroscopic observations by W. Latham and S. Meibom, and having good photometry and spectroscop…”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
PLANET OCCURRENCE WITHIN 0.25 AU OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS FROM KEPLER
Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M., Rowe, J. F., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Dunham, E. W., Gautier, T. N., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/15 · Cited by 1,151
Self-citationPLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER . III. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 16 MONTHS OF DATA
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24 · Cited by 1,042
Self-citationTHE OCCURRENCE RATE OF SMALL PLANETS AROUND SMALL STARS
Dressing, C. D., & Charbonneau, D. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/1/95 · Cited by 749
Superflares on solar-type stars
Maehara, H., Shibayama, T., Notsu, S., Notsu, Y., Nagao, T., Kusaba, S., Honda, S., Nogami, D., & Shibata, K. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11063 · Cited by 642
SUPERFLARES ON SOLAR-TYPE STARS OBSERVED WITH KEPLER . I. STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF SUPERFLARES
Shibayama, T., Maehara, H., Notsu, S., Notsu, Y., Nagao, T., Honda, S., Ishii, T. T., Nogami, D., & Shibata, K. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/5 · Cited by 500
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-09-08
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 112
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2061759127
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 48.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KEPLER INPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112
- The paper
- Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A. (2011). KEPLER INPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.