Kinematics of the Magellanic Stream and Implications for Its Ionization*
Open accessAbstract
The Magellanic Stream and the Leading Arm form a massive, filamentary system of gas clouds surrounding the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds. Here we present a new component-level analysis of their ultraviolet (UV) kinematic properties using a sample of 31 sightlines through the Magellanic System observed with the Hubble Space Telescope/Cosmic Origins Spectrograph. Using Voigt-profile fits to UV metal-line absorption, we quantify the kinematic differences between the low-ion ( and ), intermediate-ion ( ), and high-ion ( and ) absorption lines and compare the kinematics between the Stream and Leading Arm. We find that the Stream shows generally simple, single-phase kinematics, with statistically indistinguishable b-value distributions for the low-, intermediate-, and high-ion components, all dominated by narrow ( km s−1) components that are well aligned in velocity. In contrast, we find tentative evidence that the Leading Arm shows complex, multi-phase kinematics, with broader high ions than low ions. These results suggest that the Stream is photoionized up to by a hard ionizing radiation field. This can be naturally explained by the Seyfert-flare model of Bland-Hawthorn, in which a burst of ionizing radiation from the Galactic Center photoionized the Stream as it passed below the south Galactic pole. The Seyfert flare is the only known source of radiation that is both powerful enough to explain the H α intensity of the Stream and hard enough to photoionize and to the observed levels. The flare’s timescale of a few Myr suggests it is the same event that created the giant X-ray/γ-ray Fermi Bubbles at the Galactic Center.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Excess ionization in the Large Magellanic Stream compared to local high-velocity clouds indicates an ionization source at the center of the Galaxy.
“The excess ionization in the MS indicates an ionization source at the center of the Galaxy (Bland-Hawthorn et al. 2013, 2019; Fox et al. 2020).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Fox et al. 2020
Cites
Highly Ionized High‐Velocity Gas in the Vicinity of the Galaxy
Sembach, K. R., Wakker, B. P., Savage, B. D., Richter, P., Meade, M., Shull, J. M., Jenkins, E. B., Sonneborn, G., & Moos, H. W. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/346231 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Self-citationMicrowave Interstellar Medium Emission Observed by the<i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe</i>
Finkbeiner, D. P. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423482 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
The Large‐Scale Bipolar Wind in the Galactic Center
Bland‐Hawthorn, J., & Cohen, M. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/344573 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE<i>FERMI</i>HAZE: A GAMMA-RAY COUNTERPART TO THE MICROWAVE HAZE
Dobler, G., Finkbeiner, D. P., Cholis, I., Slatyer, T., & Weiner, N. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/825 · Cited by 285 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…compelling evidence that now exists for recent (Myr-timescale) activity at the GC, including the giant γ-ray emitting Fermi Bubbles (Su et al. 2010; Dobler et al. 2010; Ackermann et al. 2014), their counterparts in X-rays (Bland-Hawthorn & Cohen 2003; Miller & Bregman 2016), microwaves…”
BackgroundGiant magnetized outflows from the centre of the Milky Way
Carretti, E., Crocker, R. M., Staveley-Smith, L., Haverkorn, M., Purcell, C., Gaensler, B. M., Bernardi, G., Kesteven, M. J., & Poppi, S. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11734 · Cited by 215 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2014), their counterparts in X-rays (Bland-Hawthorn & Cohen 2003; Miller & Bregman 2016), microwaves (Finkbeiner 2004), and polarized radio emission (Carretti et al. 2013), the presence of smaller-scale (≈400 pc) radio lobes within the Bubbles (Heywood et al. 2019), and the tentative detection of…”
BackgroundInflation of 430-parsec bipolar radio bubbles in the Galactic Centre by an energetic event
Heywood, I., Camilo, F., Cotton, W. D., Yusef-Zadeh, F., Abbott, T. D., Adam, R. M., Aldera, M. A., Bauermeister, E. F., Booth, R. S., Botha, A. G., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1532-5 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Fox, A. J., Bordoloi, R., Savage, B. D., Lockman, F. J., Jenkins, E. B., Wakker, B. P., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Hernandez, S., Kim, T.-S., Benjamin, R. A., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/799/1/l7 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE INTERACTION OF THE FERMI BUBBLES WITH THE MILKY WAY’S HOT GAS HALO
Miller, M. J., & Bregman, J. N. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/9 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
FOSSIL IMPRINT OF A POWERFUL FLARE AT THE GALACTIC CENTER ALONG THE MAGELLANIC STREAM
Bland-Hawthorn, J., Maloney, P. R., Sutherland, R. S., & Madsen, G. J. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/1/58 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“The excess ionization in the MS indicates an ionization source at the center of the Galaxy (Bland-Hawthorn et al. 2013, 2019; Fox et al. 2020).”
BackgroundDiverse metallicities of Fermi bubble clouds indicate dual origins in the disk and halo
Ashley, T., Fox, A. J., Cashman, F. H., Lockman, F. J., Bordoloi, R., Jenkins, E. B., Wakker, B. P., & Karim, T. (2022) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01720-0 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Fox, A. J., Frazer, E. M., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Wakker, B. P., Barger, K. A., & Richter, P.
- Affiliations
- Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Texas Christian University (US)
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Fox, Andrew J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2020-06-29
- Volume
- 897
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W3025091975
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- NASA HST (12604)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- Magellanic Stream, Leading Arm, Magellanic System, gas kinematics, photoionization, ionization state, metal absorption lines, Galactic Center, Fermi bubbles, H-alpha emission, Voigt profile fitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review