Cited by 29Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

Variational Image Feature Extraction for the Event Horizon Telescope

Open access
Tiede, Paul, Broderick, Avery E., Palumbo, Daniel C. M.·2022·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Imaging algorithms form powerful analysis tools for very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) data analysis. However, these tools cannot measure certain image features (e.g., ring diameter) by their nonparametric nature. This is unfortunate since these image features are often related to astrophysically relevant quantities such as black hole mass. This paper details a new general image feature-extraction technique that applies to a wide variety of VLBI image reconstructions called variational image domain analysis . Unlike previous tools, variational image domain analysis can be applied to any image reconstruction regardless of its structure. To demonstrate its flexibility, we analyze thousands of reconstructions from previous Event Horizon Telescope synthetic data sets and recover image features such as diameter, orientation, and ellipticity. By measuring these features, our technique can help extract astrophysically relevant quantities such as the mass and orientation of the central black hole in M87.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3a6b

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bouman, K. L., Johnson, M. D., Zoran, D., et al. 2016, in Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), ed.
  2. M. Herbordt, M. Leeser, & L. Shannon (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE)
  3. Chael, A. A. 2019, PhD thesis, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
  4. McKinney, W. 2010, in Proc. 9th Python in Science Conf. 445, ed.
  5. Tiede, P., Broderick, A., Palumbo, D., & Chael, A. 2020, arXiv:2012.07889 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiede, P., Broderick, A. E., & Palumbo, D. C. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Tiede, Paul
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2022-01-31
Volume
925
Issue
2
Pages
122
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W4210637903
Cited by
29
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (AST-1716536, AST-1440254, AST-1935980)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF-5278)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
image feature extraction, Event Horizon Telescope, very long baseline interferometry, black hole imaging, M87, black hole mass, ring diameter, ring orientation, image reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review