Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Quijote Simulations

Open access
Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco, Hahn, ChangHoon, Massara, Elena, Banerjee, Arka, Delgado, Ana Maria, Ramanah, Doogesh Kodi, Charnock, Tom, Giusarma, Elena, Li, Yin, Allys, Erwan, Brochard, Antoine, Uhlemann, Cora, Chiang, Chi-Ting, He, Siyu, Pisani, Alice, Obuljen, Andrej, Feng, Yu, Castorina, Emanuele, Contardo, Gabriella, Kreisch, Christina D., Nicola, Andrina, Alsing, Justin, Scoccimarro, Roman, Verde, Licia, Viel, Matteo, Ho, Shirley, Mallat, Stephane, Wandelt, Benjamin, Spergel, David N.·2020·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

The Q uijote simulations are a set of 44,100 full N-body simulations spanning more than 7000 cosmological models in the hyperplane. At a single redshift, the simulations contain more than 8.5 trillion particles over a combined volume of 44,100 each simulation follows the evolution of 256 3, 512 3, or 1024 3 particles in a box of 1 h −1 Gpc length. Billions of dark matter halos and cosmic voids have been identified in the simulations, whose runs required more than 35 million core hours. The Q uijote simulations have been designed for two main purposes: (1) to quantify the information content on cosmological observables and (2) to provide enough data to train machine-learning algorithms. In this paper, we describe the simulations and show a few of their applications. We also release the petabyte of data generated, comprising hundreds of thousands of simulation snapshots at multiple redshifts; halo and void catalogs; and millions of summary statistics, such as power spectra, bispectra, correlation functions, marked power spectra, and estimated probability density functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9d82

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Villaescusa-Navarro, F., Hahn, C., Massara, E., Banerjee, A., Delgado, A. M., Ramanah, D. K., Charnock, T., Giusarma, E., Li, Y., Allys, E., Brochard, A., Uhlemann, C., Chiang, C.-T., He, S., Pisani, A., Obuljen, A., Feng, Y., Castorina, E., Contardo, G., Kreisch, C. D., Nicola, A., Alsing, J., Scoccimarro, R., Verde, L., Viel, M., Ho, S., Mallat, S., Wandelt, B., & Spergel, D. N.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2020-08-20
Volume
250
Issue
1
Pages
2
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2972913944
Cited by
336
References
51
FWCI
17.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Quijote Simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4365/ab9d82
The paper
Villaescusa-Navarro, F., Hahn, C., Massara, E., Banerjee, A., Delgado, A. M., Ramanah, D. K., Charnock, T., Giusarma, E., Li, Y., Allys, E., Brochard, A., Uhlemann, C., Chiang, C.-T., He, S., Pisani, A., Obuljen, A., Feng, Y., Castorina, E., Contardo, G., . . . Spergel, D. N. (2020). The Quijote Simulations. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab9d82

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.