The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of isolation methods of exosomes and exosomal RNA from cell culture medium and serum
Open accessAbstract
Exosomes are cell-derived vesicles and are abundant in biological fluids; they contain RNA molecules which may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers in 'precision medicine'. To promote the clinical application of exosomal RNA (exoRNA), many isolation methods must be compared and validated. Exosomes in cell culture medium (CCM) and serum may be isolated using ultracentrifugation (UC), ExoQuick or Total Exosome Isolation Reagent (TEI), and exoRNA may be extracted using TRIzol-LS, SeraMir, Total Exosome RNA Isolation (TER), HiPure Liquid RNA/miRNA kit (HLR), miRNeasy or exoRNeasy. ExoRNA was assessed using NanoDrop, Bioanalyzer 2100, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and high-throughput sequencing. UC showed the lowest recovery of particles, but the highest protein purity for exosome isolation. For isolation of exoRNA, we found that combinations of the TEI and TER methods resulted in high extraction efficiency and purity of small RNA obtained using CCM. High yield and a narrow size distribution pattern of small RNA were shown in exoRNA isolated by exoRNeasy from serum. In RNA profile analysis, the small RNA constituent ratio, miRNA content and amount varied as a result of methodological differences. This study showed that different methods may introduce variations in the concentration, purity and size of exosomes and exoRNA. Herein we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method and their application to different materials, therefore providing a reference according to research design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Isolation and Characterization of Exosomes from Cell Culture Supernatants and Biological Fluids
Théry, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G., & Clayton, A. (2006) · Current Protocols in Cell Biology · doi:10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30 · Cited by 5,766
Glypican-1 identifies cancer exosomes and detects early pancreatic cancer
Melo, S. A., Luecke, L. B., Kahlert, C., Fernandez, A. F., Gammon, S. T., Kaye, J., LeBleu, V. S., Mittendorf, E. A., Weitz, J., Rahbari, N., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14581 · Cited by 2,880
Webber, J., & Clayton, A. (2013) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v2i0.19861 · Cited by 817
Cited by
Exosome Processing and Characterization Approaches for Research and Technology Development
Lai, J. J., Chau, Z. L., Chen, S., Hill, J. J., Korpany, K. V., Liang, N., Lin, L., Lin, Y., Liu, J. K., Liu, Y., et al. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202103222 · Cited by 623
Chen, J., & Chopp, M. (2018) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.117.018292 · Cited by 152
Geekiyanage, H., Rayatpisheh, S., Wohlschlegel, J. A., Brown, R., & Ambros, V. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2008323117 · Cited by 148
Picciolini, S., Gualerzi, A., Vanna, R., Sguassero, A., Gramatica, F., Bedoni, M., Masserini, M., & Morasso, C. (2018) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00941 · Cited by 122
Chen, C., Zong, S., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, B., & Cui, Y. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201901014 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, Y.-T., Huang, Y.-Y., Zheng, L., Qin, S.-H., Xu, X.-P., An, T.-X., Xu, Y., Wu, Y.-S., Hu, X.-M., Ping, B.-H., & Wang, Q.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Medicine
- Publisher
- Spandidos Publications
- Published
- 2017-07-24
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 834-844
- ISSN
- 1107-3756 (ISSN-L)
- 1791-244X
- OpenAlex
- W2736407666
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of isolation methods of exosomes and exosomal RNA from cell culture medium and serum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3892/ijmm.2017.3080
- The paper
- Tang, Y.-T., Huang, Y.-Y., Zheng, L., Qin, S.-H., Xu, X.-P., An, T.-X., Xu, Y., Wu, Y.-S., Hu, X.-M., Ping, B.-H., & Wang, Q. (2017). Comparison of isolation methods of exosomes and exosomal RNA from cell culture medium and serum. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2017.3080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.