Cited by 154Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The Longitudinal Outcome of Fibromyalgia: A Study of 1555 Patients

Open access
WALITT, BRIAN, FITZCHARLES, MARY-ANN, HASSETT, AFTON L., KATZ, ROBERT S., HÄUSER, WINFRIED, WOLFE, FREDERICK·2011·The Journal of Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective.: To describe the diagnosis status and outcome of patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia (FM) by US rheumatologists. Methods.: We assessed 1555 patients with FM with detailed outcome questionnaires during 11,006 semiannual observations for up to 11 years. At entry, all patients satisfied American College of Rheumatology preliminary 2010 FM criteria modified for survey research. We determined diagnosis status, rates of improvement, responder subgroups, and standardized mean differences (effect sizes) between start and study completion scores of global well-being, pain, sleep problems, and health related quality of life. (QOL) Results.: The 5-year improvement rates were pain 0.4 (95% CI 0.2, 0.5), fatigue 0.4 (95% CI 0.2, 0.05), and global 0.0 (95% CI −0.1, 0.1). The standardized mean differences were patient global 0.03 (95% CI −0.02, 0.08), pain 0.22 (95% CI 0.16, 0.28), sleep problems 0.20 (95% CI 0.14, 0.25), physical component summary of the Short-form 36 (SF-36) 0.11 (95% CI −0.14, −0.07), and SF-36 mental component summary 0.03 (95% CI −0.07, 0.02). Patients switched between criteria-positive and criteria-negative states, with 716 patients (44.0%) failing to meet criteria at least once during 4228.5 patient-years (7448 observations). About 10% of patients had substantial improvement and about 15% had moderate improvement of pain. Overall, FM severity worsened in 35.9% and pain in 38.6%. Conclusion.: Although we found no average clinically meaningful improvement in symptom severity overall, 25% had at least moderate improvement of pain over time. The result that emerged from this longitudinal study was one of generally continuing high levels of self-reported symptoms and distress for most patients, but a slight trend toward improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3899/jrheum.110026

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Wolfe F. New criteria for fibromyalgia: a twenty year journey. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:583-4.
  2. Hauser W, Eich W, Herrmann M, Nutzinger DO, Schiltenwolf M, Henningsen P. Fibromyalgia syndrome: classification, diagnosis, and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009;106:383-91.
  3. Wolfe F, Hassett A, Walitt B, Michaud K. Mortality in fibromyalgia: an 8,186 patient study over 35 years. Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:94-101.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WALITT, B., FITZCHARLES, M.-A., HASSETT, A. L., KATZ, R. S., HÄUSER, W., & WOLFE, F.
Affiliations
  • The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Venue
The Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2011-07-15
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
2238-2246
ISSN
  • 0315-162X (ISSN-L)
  • 1499-2752
OpenAlex
W2150833219
Cited by
154
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
fibromyalgia, longitudinal outcomes, symptom improvement, pain, fatigue, sleep disorders, health-related quality of life, disease severity, diagnostic status, SF-36
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Fatigue, Female, Fibromyalgia, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review